Quote:
It's so obvious, isn't it, that science is actually showing that vaccines are NOT safe and effective, while the pharmaceutical industry is doing their best to pull off "Tobacco Science" and convince everyone to buy their products.
Not at all to me. And I am here, and I do listen to all the things which are posted here from anti-vax sources. And I'm completely unconvinced. I'll have to go back to the conspiracy theory point. If a person is are anti-vax the only way I can understand it is that either they think that all doctors/nursers/scientists working in health are stupid and being duped by the pharamacuetical companies, or they think they're all in it together and it's a massive conspiracy to harm children.
The best discussion of this I've found is by Science at Home blog: http://science-at-home.org/conspiracy/
And it's for a tiny profit (on pharmaceutical company scales) too. For example:
This article: http://www.jhsph.edu/news/magazine/archive/Mag_Fall02/vaccines.html
from John's Hopkins (about vaccine shortages) claims:
Quote:
Vaccines are dramatically less profitable than other drugs. In March, Science reported that GlaxoSmithKline, the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer, enjoyed worldwide vaccine sales of $4.3 billion. Contrast that figure with the profits of one drug, the cholesterol-lowering Lipitor, which grosses $6 billion a year. According to IMS Health, a pharmaceutical intelligence service, vaccines comprise only 1 to 2 percent of global pharmaceutical sales.
I just can't see how it's worth it to them. Yes I agree they have some dubious practices, but I'd be getting more angry about the huge price of cancer drugs and why they spend so much money researching viagra and so little on malaria - not the vaccination program which has saved literally millions.
Edited to remove anything which looks a "little personal". :)
Edited by prosciencemum - 10/9/12 at 5:54am
Follow Mothering