Originally Posted by prosciencemum
The things which are in the vaccine which you think cause problems have been used in millions of vaccinations and safety tested over and over again. There is no generally accepted scientific evidence that they are dangerous. They appear to be safe. This is why researchers doing safety tests use them as a placebo.
Simply not true. There has been scientific evidence for over a decade that some routinely used vaccine ingredients can be dangerous, that some people are predisposed to severe reaction, and there is increasing evidence (and that evidence is increasingly generally accepted) that those ingredients have been causing permanent damage in more and more people.
There is also increasing evidence that the vaccine manufacturers have been covering this up, just like they have been covering up severe adverse effects from many of their medications, like Vioxx, Lipitor, anti-depressants, etc.
You can keep pretending the evidence doesn't exist if it makes you feel better, but for heaven's sake, stop trying to get the rest of us to swallow such garbage.
Then again, maybe instead of being annoyed, I should just welcome the opportunity to post the proof yet again. That way, more people can read it for themselves and see his how ridiculous and pathetic the defense of the pharmaceutical industry really is.
"Vaccines are safe! They've been given to millions! " (Never mind all those you sands of people whose vaccine-induced brain damage, death, or permanent autoimmune disorders have been admitted and compensated by the government...)
"Vaccines have been safety-tested!" (Yeah, just like cigarettes were safety-tested by the tobacco companies, who swore they were not only safe, but GOOD for us! Never mind that the studies were rigged, because they were funded by, directed by, and interpreted by the vaccine manufacturers. Never mind that there was conflict of interest among the government officials and the advisory committees.)
"They are used because they appear to be safe!" (No, they are used because it's a great way to hide the damage that those ingredients can cause. A comparable study would be to safety-test 2 brands of cigarettes, varying the kind of paper used, but NOT the nicotine, and then declaring that cigarettes don't cause cancer, because the initial tests of nicotine by the tobacco companies concluded that nicotine is safe. And good for you. Like broccoli.)