Quote:
Originally Posted by
mammal_mama 
Well, I'm the mother of two girls, age 12 and age 7, and both continued imaginary play well beyond the age of three. My 7-year-old still immerses herself frequently in imaginary worlds. I really don't think it's all that cut and dry when one phase of life ends and another begins. I also think there can be lots of overlap, lots of beginning new phases while still being engaged with what some see as activities for younger kids.
Both of my girls have some things in common developmentally, but in some ways they are very different, and they've crossed milestones at very different ages.
My 5-year-old does as well. She has huge imaginary worlds she's made up. I said up-thread that I was the same way. I suppose that where some posters (me included) have some difficulty is in the OP's insistence that this isn't a fact-based discussion about a doll being a relative. I've set places at our table for DD's imaginary friends and "fed" her imaginary dogs. But we all knew that it wasn't real. If another child or an adult had said that her imaginary dog wasn't real, I would have said, "well, yes, but we enjoy pretending that he is." If DD got upset (even now, she's 5) by the admission that the dog's not real, I would explain it further because the dog ISN'T real. The dog is pretend. The issue that I read here - and this is why I think there's concern - is that either the OP or her daughter is insistent on this fantasy not being interrupted. Honestly even if it wasn't a problem at last year's school, it still may be this year at that school. You say that your daughter doesn't bring it up, but obviously she does (or did?) because the teachers know enough about this sister to realize that it's a doll.
I wonder, too, about the idea of consulting professionals. If I called my pediatrician and said, "you know, my DD has an imaginary dog, and her teachers are concerned," I'm sure that she would say it's age appropriate. If I said, "my DD has a dog. Now it's not real, but she thinks it's real. She speaks about it as if it's real and got very upset when her teacher said that it was a pretend dog," I think our doctor's reaction would be different. So I think that the initial post presented one situation - a play-world with doll as "sister" - that IS perfectly normal and creative, but later posts seem to suggest something else going on - at least to me. I would be concerned if my daughter were to take her fantasy world to the place of not being able to accept anyone pointing out the fantasy.
That, to me, is still separate from the issue of how the teachers handled the issue, which I think was poor. I'm just not entirely sure that what they're saying is off-base. I cannot think of a single child who at 6 or 7 truly believed she was related to a toy to the point that it caused stress.
Follow Mothering