Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trisha Kalous 
We originally wanted only 1-1.5 years apart with our children. It might have worked, had I not had two m/c's when DD was 10 and 11 mos old. As it turns out, this is the first time since that I've gotten pregnant and I'm soo glad that it turned out this way! DD is still nursing (nearly every day, sometimes a couple times a day) and I'm glad that she's had this time with me all to herself. She is also very excited about a baby and often talks to my belly and gives it kisses. It is very sweet
She is looking forward to helping me in labor and being there when baby is born and I have no doubt that she'll be a very good helper once baby is born. She is already good at getting her own breakfast and starting the TV so I can get some extra sleep in
Self-sufficiency will be such a blessing in those delirious, newly postpartum days!
I agree, DD is very self sufficient as well and even though we dont have cable tv she keeps herself entertained all day. She also still sleeps 12 hrs a night, so we always sleep in... Now for the bad news :P I had one long contraction yesterday (hubby is deployed, so I was alone) and DD immediately was full of energy and wouldn't stop talking. When I was in labor, the room needed to be dead quiet so I could relax and sleep, so DD's constant moving and talking actually made the contraction much worse. I know lots of women who say how great it is to have their children present, but after my experience yesterday, I can honestly say, having DD there during labor would not work in my favor, in terms of pain management. After the contraction I took it as a sign that I shouldn't put myself in a situation where I'll have to focus on DD and birthing this baby. With that said, I'm glad I learned this before, rather than in May.
Follow Mothering