erigeron, I am not sure what the "nope" was for. I said autism was defined by symptoms I said there was no biological test for autism. Both of these statement you agreed with.
You then went on about how they rule out other conditions before reaching a diagnosis, which I did not discuss at all (therefore there is no need for a "nope").
Either you did not read too carefully, there is a miscommunication, or you just like saying "nope" to those you generally disagree with.
Edited by kathymuggle - 12/30/12 at 5:42pm