A study run by generation rescue will not be lauded if the science is bad, period. Just like the phone survey that showed unvaccinated children were more likely to have autism wasn't lauded. Because the science was bad.
I am concerned with funding. But i don't consider it a reason to throw the whole thing out automatically. The methodological concerns that are already coming up, though . . .
Wonderful. Are you assuming the science is bad?
Well, I guess then, to you, Jackson University might as well play baseball.
Funding. Okay, suggest a way of funding that YOU would approve of, and then make it happen.