I feel a little callous for admitting this
, but is anyone else annoyed by stories of children who came down with a VAD - which caused their parents to have a complete turn-around on their beliefs - and induced them to go to the media and tell everyone they need to vax and they were duped by non-vaxxers?
The vast majority of sel/delayed and non-vaxxers I know IRL and online devote a great amount of time to researching both vaccine and diseases.
I don't think my child coming down with diptheria or tetanus or whatever would cause me to think I had been duped by non-vaxxers. For goodness sake - I know the stats on the prevalence of those diseases, if my child come down with a VAD, I will know it is just bad luck.







. I tried to put myself in a pro-vaxxers shoes, and ask myself if I, a pro-vaxxer, would be annoyed if someone switched sides, went to the media and claimed they were duped by the pro-vax side if their child experienced a vaccine reaction. The answer is a qualified yes. Most pro-vaxxers (not just people who vax) are reasonably educated on vaxxing; they know darn well there are risks to vaxxing, and if g-d forbid a serious side effect happened to them, well, they went in knowing it was a possibility. I would not expect a highly informed pro-vaxxer to switch sides completely because their child experienced a rare and acknowledged serious reaction. I can see them decide to revisit vaxxing, perhaps not vax due to the fact that they personally can not stomach the risks or are worried that it might not be a good choice for their family due to history- but switch sides completely and go to the media because their child was the 1/1million who had an anaphylaxis reaction (for example)? Nope.

Follow Mothering