I'm wondering what's up with my 13.5wk uterus being as high (and full!) as an average 19wk - just a finger width below my navel. My older sister had naturally conceived twins 1.5 years ago, and the coincidence of timing (same edd months) and our close age (2y8m and so I'm only 8 months younger than she was at the time) have made me wonder early on. Now, I'm just wondering if it's due to being #5, multiples, or nothing at all.
- HeatherB
- Trader Feedback: +42
- God-fearing; Baby-wearing
-
- online
- 9,405 Posts. Joined 1/2003
- Location: Sugar Land, there is no equal
- Select All Posts By This User
I've read that a woman's fundal height should be pretty much average until 20 weeks, even with twins. Was this your experience?
I'm wondering what's up with my 13.5wk uterus being as high (and full!) as an average 19wk - just a finger width below my navel. My older sister had naturally conceived twins 1.5 years ago, and the coincidence of timing (same edd months) and our close age (2y8m and so I'm only 8 months younger than she was at the time) have made me wonder early on. Now, I'm just wondering if it's due to being #5, multiples, or nothing at all.
I'm wondering what's up with my 13.5wk uterus being as high (and full!) as an average 19wk - just a finger width below my navel. My older sister had naturally conceived twins 1.5 years ago, and the coincidence of timing (same edd months) and our close age (2y8m and so I'm only 8 months younger than she was at the time) have made me wonder early on. Now, I'm just wondering if it's due to being #5, multiples, or nothing at all.










Follow Mothering