or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › Vaccinations Debate › Australia bans flu vaccine - child in coma
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Australia bans flu vaccine - child in coma - Page 4

post #61 of 73
Pek, you're being ridiculous. We're not making this stuff up.
post #62 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeckyBird View Post

Dr. Sears' review of aluminum in vaccines:
http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/vaccines/vaccine-faqs

Dr sears doesn't do a great job, IMO, with aluminum. He way oversimplifies it and overstates the dangers.
post #63 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

Pek, you're being ridiculous. We're not making this stuff up.


Neither am I. Just because you and/or the vaccine manufacturers want for the vaccine to go into the lymph system does not mean it *does* go into the lymph system.

And resorting to insults instead of information shows your poor position.
post #64 of 73
I'm not insulting you, I'm describing your behavior. Accurately. This is like a blind person saying the sky is red and then refusing to believe anyone who says its blue.
post #65 of 73
Guidelines specify talking about the issues and not each other. Please edit to remove personal attack., Rrrrachel.
post #66 of 73
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

I'm not insulting you, I'm describing your behavior. Accurately. This is like a blind person saying the sky is red and then refusing to believe anyone who says its blue.

Pot calling kettle........

 

It works both ways you know.

post #67 of 73
I'm not aware of when I've denied the basic nature of how the immune system works, but ok.
post #68 of 73
Also, pek, you realize te link you posted didn't say injecting insulin into the interstitial space moved it directly into the blood stream, rather they measure an increase in the LYMPH SYSTEM.
post #69 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by pek64 View Post

And I provided a link that shows insulin, injected the same way as vaccines, goes into the bloodstream. Therefore, vaccines do as well.

You do realize that insulin is a completely different substance than a vaccine and the body is able to recognize this and react accordingly right?
post #70 of 73

We've received a few flags from this thread. As many of your know the guidelines for Vax Discussion and Debate vary from the general forum guidelines. Those flagging and those participating in personal debate can refresh for the UA. I am not asking for edits - just a review. Thanks!  

 

 

Quote:
Members should know that the forum might be a little more brusque than others, and that if they want to post in there they should be prepared for it - as the mods won't be removing everything they feel is a slight or an insult.

 

 

Quote:
Some generic examples of what is and is not permitted:
 
"WTF! Are you serious with this?! Ridiculous!!" Things like this are often reported in Vaccinations, but in a heated discussion/debate this is just an interjection, not really an attack. So it would not be moderated.

 

 

Quote:
Intelligent, informative, and civil debate should be the shining light of this forum.
post #71 of 73

As for the OP at least that article was reporting on the 2010 report and its implications for today. Still the article's title is pretty misleading and sensational, IMO.  I recently saw a 2010 article on this subject floating around on a health FB site as if it was current news (the date of the article was not included and one had to search for the origin of the story...grrr!) . That same site posted another dubious photo/link combination that I felt was misleading. They are one strike away from a mean old "unfriending" from me. orngtongue.gif Of course I think lots of groups do this but I subscribe mostly to alternative sites so I see it more from that perspective. The perception that "we" alternative types are easily dunked and etc. is not helped by stuff like this. Mirzam, I'm not meaning to dig on your link - I think the article itself is fine but wonder why they chose the title they did. I would have preferred something like, "The 2010 ban on the flu vaccine continues in Australia."  (if that is infact true?) 

post #72 of 73
Alright. I've been busy the past couple of days, but I have some time, now.

ICM, I think you have let our past disagreement color your judgment. There is a difference between an interjection and name calling.

Rrrrachel, here is a better explaination of how the lymph and circulatory systems work in conjunction with each other.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CE4QFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ehow.com%2Fhow-does_5004821_lymphatic-system-interact-cardiovascular-system.html&ei=ZJAhUdjfNIjuqQHg84D4Cg&usg=AFQjCNHsvNuTLsxUUCNzM3Co2hmdIYRJew&sig2=xzbUdLta1khhA6W_Qzcrmw
post #73 of 73
Like I said like 40 posts ago, it ends up in the blood stream after passing through the lymph system. It is not injected directly into the bloodstream.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations Debate
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › Vaccinations Debate › Australia bans flu vaccine - child in coma