...or am I the only freak?
I mean, I know I'm behind almost everyone here (due 2/28 or 3/1), and ask me again in a couple weeks, but...
I feel like 39 weeks is the absolute earliest Buko could comfortably come in terms of my finishing up the bare minimum of important work-related and organizational and baby things, "feeling ready," DH getting his footing in the job he JUST started, etc.
40 weeks would be preferable, as it would give me time to tie up most loose ends (and Dr. Mom is coming at 39w6d).
41 weeks would actually give me time to relax and do minimal work (I run my own-- thankfully, flexible-- business, so I'll be working at least a couple hours a day until I go into labor) while I did some optional fun "projects" and hung out with Mom and whatnot.
42 weeks has both pros and cons, and I'd MUCH rather not go over 42. But really? 41 weeks-- or at LEAST 40-- would be my preference.
Just me? Am I a total nutjob? Will I change my mind? How about you?




(Both sides of my family are full of ornery people, so they aren't offended.) So I don't have those voices in my brain too much... yet, anyway. Plus, my MWs have no "deadline" for risking out of HB, and they are really VERY anti-intervention (even "natural") when possible. They actually recommend against EPO, RRL tea, etc. I mean-- these are very "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" types, which is awesome, because I feel the same way.


Follow Mothering