or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › Vaccinations Debate › New study shows no connection between full vaccine schedule and autism.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New study shows no connection between full vaccine schedule and autism.

post #1 of 148
Thread Starter 
I'm sure folks will come along and explain how that's not what it means at all (wink1.gif), but for your reading pleasure:

http://triblive.com/mobile/3746544-96/vaccines-autism-antigens

I'm trying to find a copy of the actual study.
post #2 of 148
I won't comment on the study itself until I see the whole thing. But was anybody, on MDC or elsewhere, making the argument that the U.S. vax schedule in the aggregate causes autism?

That's not a snarky or rhetorical question. I just haven't heard the argument. (And to be fair, I don't follow all of the threads here).
post #3 of 148
Thread Starter 
The actual study isn't out until tomorrow. I have a hard time keeping the arguments straight, but there definitely is a claim that vaccines cause autism, although I'm honestly not sure if people think getting one is just as bad as getting them all or what. It will be interesting to see what exactly the study compares.
post #4 of 148
Here's a bit more information: http://www.postcrescent.com/viewart/20130328/APC0101/303280470/Full-vaccine-schedule-safe-kids

A quote from Geraldine Dawson at Autism Speaks (not involved in study):

"This study shows definitively that there is no connection between the number of vaccines that children receive in childhood, or the number of vaccines that children receive in one day, and autism.”
post #5 of 148

Funny, Dawson's comment is a scientifically different conclusion from the study's conclusion. 

 

Further perspective can be gained here: http://autism.about.com/b/2009/09/10/is-autism-speaks-mis-spending-its-money-your-opinion-requested.htm

 

Many of the comments are interesting as well. 

 

Seems like there is a question of whether Autism Speaks is a front group for the pharmaceutical industry, who is directly benefitting from Autism Speaks, while families of severely autistic children, who are desperate for immediate help, are not benefitting an any way shape or form. 

 

But even the mildly affected autistic community dislikes Autism Speaks: http://www.examiner.com/article/why-autistic-people-don-t-like-autism-speaks

 

I suspec that that dislike extends to Chief Scientific Officer Dawson, who pulls in a salary of $650K and oversees funding of studies that attempt--and fail--to find the non-vaccine cause of autism. 

 

For those whose autism IS linked with vaccines, this is like attempting to prove that cigarettes are not linked with lung cancer.  

post #6 of 148
Thread Starter 
Taxi have you found a copy of the actual study?
post #7 of 148
Thread Starter 
post #8 of 148

 Is this the study? I found it on your link above.

"Increasing exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in vaccines is not associated with risk of autism," by Frank DeStefano, MD, MPH, Cristofer S. Price, ScM, and Eric S. Weintraub, MPH, appears in The Journal of Pediatrics (www.jpeds.com), DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.02.001, published by Elsevier.

 

 

Why don't I trust Elsevier, you ask? It is part of the Reed-Elsevier group.

 

"The Lancet, the journal the paper was published in, is owned by global publishing giant Reed-Elsevier. Reed-Elsevier own 2,460 scientific journals, as well as the magazine New Scientist."

 

"Reed-Elsevier's CEO, Sir Crispin Davis, is a non-executive director of GlaxoSmithKline. And his brother, Sir Nigel Davis, was a judge who withdrew legal aid from families who claimed their children were damaged by GlaxoSmithKline's MMR vaccine."

"Worse still, in 2009 the pharmaceutical giant Merck was sued for paying Elsevier to create a fake journal to promote their products."

 

(And, for those of you interested,  Reed-Elsevier was also the company Peter Power of Visor Consultants was running mock terror drills for on the morning of 7/7.)

post #9 of 148
Thread Starter 
So any commentary on the actual study?
post #10 of 148
I was reading the insert that came with a particular vaccine (I can't remember which vaccine; I need to find it). Among the side effects it had autism listed right there in black and white. This is information directly from the company that manufactures the vaccine. I believe it was for pneumonia but I can't remember the brand.

It also had SIDS as a side effect.

I will look for the actual insert I am speaking of. But I just remember thinking WTH? So much time spent saying vaccines do not cause autism and then it's listed as a side effect.

I'm no scientist. I'm just a mother who thinks that doesn't make any sense.
post #11 of 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

So any commentary on the actual study?

The study published by a company with questionable motives/agenda?

No.

post #12 of 148
Thread Starter 
Dalia the process for adding side effects to a package insert may not be what you would expect. When they do preclinical trials anything that shows up in the treatment group above a certain number, even if its just by random chance, gets put on the package insert. Even if its not substantially different than the control group or overall population. Theres no requirwment for evidence of any kind of causal relationship. It's kind of a cya thing. Then those inserts don't really change, even as more and more science is done after the vaccine is licensed and put into use.
post #13 of 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

So any commentary on the actual study?

Well, some of us actually have children at home today, so it's not like we have unlimited time to search for and analyze studies, let alone post 20 times a day.

 

But so far, what jumps out at me (including some copy/paste):

 

 

"Of the remaining 752 controls included in the analysis, 186 had an SCQ score <16 but had indications of speech delay or language delay, learning disability, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or attention deficit disorder, or tics, or had an individual education plans."

 

186 of the 752 controls had possible symptoms of autism.  Those were the CONTROLS?  Nearly 25% of the CONTROL group may have had possible symptoms of autism????

 

Also, they studied the possible relationship of autism to total antigenic exposure.  Most of the scientists who ARE seriously questioning whether vaccines are causally related with autism are not worried about antigenic exposure as they are worried about the effect of things like aluminum and thimerosal. "Admittedly, this approach assumes that all proteins and polysaccharides in a vaccine evoke equivalent immune responses, whereas some proteins actually may be more likely than others to stimulate an immune response.14 "

 

"How evidence of early neurodevelopmental delays would have affected our results is not clear; it might have resulted in lower vaccination levels if parents were concerned about vaccinating their children, or possibly higher vaccination levels through more frequent contact with the healthcare system. "  BUT THEY DID NOT COMPARE VACCINATED VS UNVACCINATED CHILDREN.

 

"We thank Dr Paul Offit for his assistance in determining the antibody- stimulating protein and polysaccharide content of specific vaccines. 

 

Aha--now we know why:

1) the focus of the article is on the relationship between vaccine antigen exposure and autism (rather than the cumulative effect of heavy metals from vaccines)

2) why there is no comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (surely if they were combing through the records of three different managed health cares, they could have found some unvaccinated individuals, even back then).

 

Most importantly, it explains the MASSIVE discrepancy between the conclusion of the study and Geraldine Dawson's ridiculous conclusion:

 

STUDY CONCLUSION: "It can be argued that ASD with regression, in which children usually lose developmental skills during the second year of life, could be related to exposures in infancy, including vaccines; however, we found no association between exposure to antigens from vaccines during infancy and the development of ASD with regression."

 

Geraldine Dawson's conclusion:  "This study shows definitively that there is no connection between the number of vaccines that children receive in childhood, or the number of vaccines that children receive in one day, and autism.”"

post #14 of 148

At a very cursory glance, I would say the title should really be:

 

"antigen level from vaccines not linked to autism in vaccinated individuals"

 

That is not quite the same no connection between full schedule and autism. 

post #15 of 148
Thread Starter 
Yeah when I wrote the original thread title, Kathy, the full study hadn't come out yet I was going based on the article. The study is definitely limited in scope to the concept of "too many too soon".
post #16 of 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrrrachel View Post

I'm sure folks will come along and explain how that's not what it means at all (wink1.gif), but for your reading pleasure:

http://triblive.com/mobile/3746544-96/vaccines-autism-antigens

I'm trying to find a copy of the actual study.

Well, now that we've explained that the conclusion of the study is not at all what your thread title says it is, what would you like to do about it?


Edited by Taximom5 - 3/29/13 at 3:18pm
post #17 of 148
The study concerned antigens, not vaccines, true? Or did I miss something in my skim?

I have got to go, anyway. There's just no time for debate today.
post #18 of 148
Thread Starter 
It concerned vaccines and looked specifically at the effect of antigens.
post #19 of 148
Quote:
The study concerned antigens, not vaccines, true? Or did I miss something in my skim?

 

In my skimming it appears to me that they took about 1000 kids who had been vaccinated and looked at the number of antigens received by all of them via vax and then determined the group of kids with autism got the same number of antigens as the group of kids without autism, which ya know makes sense if they are all on the same or similar vax schedules.

post #20 of 148
Thread Starter 
Where does it say they were all vaccinated or Ben that they were all vaccinated on the same schedule?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations Debate
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Baby › Baby Health › Vaccinations › Vaccinations Debate › New study shows no connection between full vaccine schedule and autism.