No, sorry, teacozy, you can't switch the focus like that and expect that nobody will catch you.
I have no idea what you are describing as "my scenario," because I didn't have one. I addressed the issue by stating that there is clearly a lot of key information missing.
You tried to twist the issue into a question of which one of two possible scenarios is more likely, which is both ridiculous and irrelevant, since key information is missing. It doesn't matter which scenario you, or I , or anybody, thinks is more logical. The only thing that matters is what really happened (which likely doesn't involve either of the two scenarios you describe), and we can't find that out.
I'm not switching the focus. You have *not* answered the question directly. If you believe you have, please show me where you stated that you believe that either A or B is more plausible. That's all I'm saying. So, to clear this all up, why don't you just answer the question? I mean do I have to link the thalidomide thread from last week to show you that this is *exactly* the kind of thing that was demanded of me? I HAD to answer either Yes or No. I also tried to explain I wasn't really familiar with the topic and didn't have all the information necessary to simply answer yes or no. The links I saw were not evidence, they were news articles that provided *no* sources for any of the claims they made. Nope. Still borderline harassed over and over by multiple people to ANSWER YES OR NO. So, why haven't you answered the question? Just state A or B. It's not hard! Go on! I'm waiting! Again, do we all understand how obnoxious this kind of questioning is?