Neither one !
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mand
What I am wondering is: if you choose not to vaccinate, does that mean that your child WILL get measles, whooping cough, tetanus etc?
|
I have passive immunity to Rubella. Never vaxed- never had it. Yet, I test immune.
Your child does not have to be directly exposed to develop immunity- perhaps if she was nursed she did develop passive immunity that stuck with her, maybe not. Even if exposed she could avoid not get immunity/catching it.
Even kids who are vaxed are not always immune- hence why most PG women are tested for Rubella during pregnancy. Most were vaxed yet many show no immunity.
There are no absolutes when it comes to passive immunity. And still some gray areas with active immunity ( having had the disease itself).
We work on having a healthy immune system, but also avoid direct exposure if I know ( I would never attend a pox party for example)
You might be interested in reading some works of Florence Nightengale. Her documentation of how disease would just spring up as if from no where led her and other past epidemiologists to come up with theories that the right conditions must be present for disease to flourish. Yes, some of that is outdated, but still facinating stuff- very homeopathic in nature.
PS as for 3rd world countries- well, they do not have access to good food and clean water and emergency care. We do. Although with most childhood diseases , emergency care is not even an issue. I did not take my child to the doc with the pox for example. I don't subscribe to the western model so I don't fall back on it either.