Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Spirituality › Religious Studies › Can Christianity only be defined in masculine terms?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Can Christianity only be defined in masculine terms? - Page 4  

post #61 of 67
I've enjoyed it too! I've always felt that the feminine "side" of Christianity has been understated and minimized throughout history. I'm beginning to see how well recognition of and reverence for the feminine fits with my beliefs and loving it!
post #62 of 67
Thread Starter 
Thanks everyone. I learned alot from all of you. It is nice to have some intellectually stimulating "conversation" here. I definetly was moved into some spiritual growth by you people!!!!
Love, Michelle

Now, off to post my next question!
post #63 of 67
Michelle, I hope you don't mind me posting one more time. I don't really consider myself Christian anymore, in the sense that I've always known it to be. But I do absolutely believe in God(dess). I'm still working out the rest of it, like you are. BUt I really feel that the Bible is exclusive to any known form of Christianity. I truly believe that the key to understanding your (general "you" there) faith is to try to get to the nature of God. God came before any of the religions. He (She) WAS before all of it. And still IS. I AM. You know? So, that frees me up a lot to think about things, and follow my own path. And I feel freer without the confines of any particular faith around me. (Eg, God won't strike me down if I do this, or it's not blasphemous to think this... etc.) Still, if I had to classify myself, I'd be pretty Christian in my beliefs.
post #64 of 67
Thread Starter 
Found this article, interesting http://www.beingjewish.com/kresel/gender.html
post #65 of 67
I'm sorry if I am repeating something dealt with in this thread I haven't read the entirety of, but one thing I appreciate greatly about the Quakers is that they have right from the first had an equality between men and women. God is not male or female, but a divine light.
post #66 of 67

Equal Doesn't Mean Same

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourgrtkidos
G-d is both male and female.I agree, and is the reason for this post. I want to find a Church that honours both the male and the female. I do not want to go in the complete opposite direction and go to a Church that only recognizes the femaleness of G-d. I am not against male, and that is a misconception I am running into when I say the word FEMINIST.
I know I am in the minority here, but as a Catholic, I believe the church DOES honour both male and female. Just because people do not have the SAME roles does not mean they do not have EQUAL roles. God created us with this in mind. Personally, I find offense with the "feminist" culture that thinks I "sold-out" by embracing my feminity and desire to stay at home and nurture my family.

The most common analogy throughout the old and new testaments of the bible that God uses to describe his relationship with his people is that of the bride and groom. The pope wrote a wonderful description of this image and how it applies to human sexuality in his Theology of the Body. He explained how even our bodies are made in the image of God, and how sexual intercourse in marriage is physically representative of how God gives his love to the church and the church accepts that love, conceives it, and bears that love to the world! (i. e. children). It is beautiful and takes the idea of the church as the bride of Christ/God to a deeper more personal level. Both the masculine and feminine are needed to make this image complete!

No, women are not priests, but men are not mothers, and I think motherhood is an enormous gift, and while not the SAME, is certainly EQUAL to any role that men have.
post #67 of 67
Thread Starter 
well said.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Religious Studies
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Spirituality › Religious Studies › Can Christianity only be defined in masculine terms?