Ok, in SS the past few weeks we were talking about fasting. To be specific we were talking about how in Luke 5:33-39 (also Matt and Mark) John's disciples and the Pharisees come to Jesus and ask... We are fasting but yet your disciples don't. Why?
In verse 34 it says (NIV) "Jesus answered them, "Can you make the guests of the bridegroom fast while he is with them? But the time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them; in those days they will fast"
Now, I know he is "hinting" at the crucifixion. My question comes at the idea of fasting. Should we fast today? Because the bridgroom has been taken awsay and he has not yet returned. In SS they were saying that we don't have to fast because it was never commanded.
But I'm wondering what it means when he says the bridegroom is with them. They were saying that once Christ ascended that he was "with them" and then the fasting could cease. But was he talking about the second comming. Becuase I don't see those 2 things being the same.
I know that one thing that Jesus did was to bring about a new law. In this same passage it talks about new wine in old wine skins. But I'm wondering just because Jesus didn't say "Fast when I'm gone" or "Don't worry about fasting anymore" doesn't really mean it was removed from the new law.
Does that make sense??
I was reading a book and it talked about how conservatives and liberals are alike in one area. They tend to pick and choose out of the bible the things that they like. For instance conservatives are big on baptism and such but they skip the idea of covered heads saying it doens't matter. Where as liberals may say that we need to be all inclusive in our beliefs but ignore the place where it says "I am the way the truth and the life..." (please note the use of conservative and liberal is loose).
Anyway, round about way of saying... Do you think that fasting should be a part of everyday Christian life?
Can someone help me out or am I jsut confusing?? or confused??
In verse 34 it says (NIV) "Jesus answered them, "Can you make the guests of the bridegroom fast while he is with them? But the time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them; in those days they will fast"
Now, I know he is "hinting" at the crucifixion. My question comes at the idea of fasting. Should we fast today? Because the bridgroom has been taken awsay and he has not yet returned. In SS they were saying that we don't have to fast because it was never commanded.
But I'm wondering what it means when he says the bridegroom is with them. They were saying that once Christ ascended that he was "with them" and then the fasting could cease. But was he talking about the second comming. Becuase I don't see those 2 things being the same.I know that one thing that Jesus did was to bring about a new law. In this same passage it talks about new wine in old wine skins. But I'm wondering just because Jesus didn't say "Fast when I'm gone" or "Don't worry about fasting anymore" doesn't really mean it was removed from the new law.
Does that make sense??
I was reading a book and it talked about how conservatives and liberals are alike in one area. They tend to pick and choose out of the bible the things that they like. For instance conservatives are big on baptism and such but they skip the idea of covered heads saying it doens't matter. Where as liberals may say that we need to be all inclusive in our beliefs but ignore the place where it says "I am the way the truth and the life..." (please note the use of conservative and liberal is loose).
Anyway, round about way of saying... Do you think that fasting should be a part of everyday Christian life?
Can someone help me out or am I jsut confusing?? or confused??






I ast when my prayer life needs a boost. Hey, you aren't busy eating might as well pray :LOL also those hunger pains are great reminders to prayer. Also it is a way to offer up sacrifices.
, vehicles... I guess anything that you have that serves purpose.. I think...
