Disclaimer: I'm totally not knocking you, Lula's Mom. My comments are directed at the "logic" of Love and Logic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lula's Mom
If you read the book you'd probably get more of an idea about why this works. I don't think it's manipulative at all, actually. Manipulation would be trying to coerce them into doing something that you (general you) want them to do, but they don't want to do it. But with this, you're not.
|
Perhaps not the first time it happens, because they have no idea that there is any consequence to you picking up the toys (which, by the way, I think is totally unfair).
The second time, though, you are totally manipulating them into making the choice you want them to make. If the alternative is having their toys taken away and they don't want that to happen, then they're forced to make the other choice. I don't know how I feel about that (because, truly, it's also unfair for a parent to have to trip over a toy over and over again... though there are surely other options that could be discussed between parent and child), but let's still call it what it is - manipulation.
(And I also don't like the sad, sympathetic voice. You do something to a child that you know they're not going to like and then affect sadness and sympathy? It really doesn't seem genuine - and kids pick up on that stuff).
I'm totally with you on the playground thing, though, Lula's Mom. It makes me cringe when I hear parents (all the time) say things like, "You're going to break your neck!" or "Don't do that! You're going to fall!" to their children. Besides the fact that it's likely not to happen and your child is going to learn that you don't know what you're talking about, they might just stop doing anything that challenges them.
Quote:
| The point of the book is that 1) there's no better way to learn about consequences then by experiencing them |
This I do agree with and when negative consequences to a choice are unavoidable, it's definitely my role as a parent to cushion the blow by forewarning him. But it seems that this sort of thinking can lead to a somewhat "black and white" vision of parenting - either it happens the way the parent wants, or it happens a different way and the child experiences something negative. There are often other ways - real choices - where everyone can win.
For example, in Annettemarie's picking up the toys scenario (though I also wouldn't try this with my ds when it was bedtime

):
Me: Michael, while you are waiting for Daddy to be ready to read you a story, please pick up the stuff on the floor of your bedroom.
Michael: (screaming) I HATE picking stuff up. (Spit)
Me: Me, too! I really hate picking stuff up! You know what else I hate? When my stuff gets broken because I leave it out and people step on it. I know! Let's do it together... maybe we can have a race.
(By this time, ds is often pretty gung-ho and comes up with other ideas of ways we can have fun doing it).
On the occasion that he's tired and he's really not up for it, I might give in, but say:
I can see that you're really tired. Let's make a deal. I'll pick them up this time and next time we do it together. Deal?
(We've been making deals for a long time, so he's used to this).
Just some ideas, anyway.
