Nursing Mother wrote:
Quote:
| I wouldn't respect anyone having casual sex as it is dangerous and wrong imo. |
I think what you meant to say is that you wouldn't condone the BEHAVIOR regardless of who did it (even your own child), but what you actually said in this sentence is that you
wouldn't respect anyone having casual sex which seems to mean you don't respect a PERSON who has casual sex. This is a crucial distinction. (The only way I can figure out what you meant is by the other things you said, about still respecting the person in other ways.) If you do have to cope with finding out that one your children has made sexual choices different from the ones you wanted him/her to make, I hope you will remember to make it crystal clear that your respect for every other aspect of him/her is unchanged and that your disappointment with the sexual behavior does not make you think he/she is a bad person.
Quote:
| Can one talk about those issues, abortion, BDSM, porn, etc with ones teen yet still not condone those behaviors or acts. I am very close with my teens and we talk about those things |
Seems like you've answered your own question! Of course it is possible to talk about an issue, to acknowledge that it is a choice some people make, without saying that it is a good idea. My parents did an excellent job of that on the issue of BDSM: They said, basically, "Some people like to hurt each other as part of their sexual activity. We believe it's wrong to hurt anyone on purpose. We believe sex should be caring and gentle and should not involve pain. We feel sad and worried that there are people who like to get hurt. We don't understand why they like what they do, but we don't know everything about them, and it isn't our business to say what consenting adults should do when they're alone. It's something some people like, but if you don't want to try it there's no reason why you ever should, and don't let anyone talk you into it."
LizD wrote:
Quote:
| Well, I am glad Raven67 is here! I knew there must be some poly folks on here! |

I am poly! I alluded to it earlier in this thread and have talked about it in more detail in other threads. Actually, I think one of the reasons I am poly is the way I was raised: being taught to love all the many wonderful people around us rather than restricting affections to a particular social group, a religious or racial community, or one "best friend", in combination with being taught to enjoy my own sexuality, in combination with being encouraged to be an independent woman rather than depending on Prince Charming.
Raven67 mentioned
a charming essay from a 14-year-old about "outercourse" as an option for teens not yet ready for intercourse. I think that's one of the most neglected topics in talking about teen sexuality! As on many other issues, a lot of people have a very "all or nothing" view of sex, and that can lead teens who are feeling horny and attracted to each other to think that the ONLY thing to do is have intercourse. This exposes them to many more risks than touching or even oral sex. I almost feel it should be REQUIRED that people of any age, but especially teens, have at least one session of just touching before they have intercourse together. It's worked out great for me!

Arduinna wrote:
Quote:
| I'd still really love to discuss the topic. Specifically how to help teens identify when they are ready for sex. Other than "when you get married" |
I posted some ideas earlier. Did you miss them, or not find them helpful?
I agree with Raven67 that making books available is a good idea. I would suggest actively showing (even reading to) your daughter those books that contain really crucial information, for instance something like
Our Bodies, Ourselves. Be more passive with books about alternative-type stuff--just put them on a shelf, discreet but in plain sight, and if you see her reading one don't pounce eagerly (that's likely to embarrass her) but the next time you're talking ask her what she thought of the book and if she has questions.
Comments like, "Look, hon, in this movie, they are assuming that girls would not be interested in sex unless they were corrupted by a powerful male, we know that is not true." I think are better when the last clause is replaced with "What do you think?" or "Why would they write it that way?" Then it comes across as an invitation to discussion, rather than beating the kid over the head with your opinions.
