I'm just curious if any of you have kids with birth dates close to the "cut-off" for starting school & how it worked out for your kids to be the oldest (or youngest) in their class. My poor girls are both right by the cut off. Here they need to be 5 by Sept. 15th to start kindergarten.
My older dd's bd is August 29th. I was strongly encouraged by the school & the district to hold her back a year b/c "the younger children invariably fail," & a bunch of other negative comments like that. Despite their advice, her preschool teachers felt that we should start her & we did last year. She was the youngest child in her kindergarten class by far, but she did awesome. She is very strong willed & did fine socially & tested advanced on everything that they tested them on. I am very glad that we didn't hold her back b/c I think that she would have been bored. She's in first grade now & doing just fine.
The problem that I'm running into is that my younger dd's bd is Sept. 27th, so she cannot start at almost 5, like her sister did. However, she is significantly beyond where her sister was academically at 3-4 y/o & I am truly worried that she is going to be bored if she is the oldest kid in her class.
I could put her in private kindergarten at the school where she attends pre-k, but we can't afford to keep her there permanently & the public school has told me that they will make her repeat a grade if we try to sneak her in this way & they transfer her to public. I am also worried that, if we do not do kindergarten at 5 & keep her in two years of pre-k, she is going to feel like she is being kept back, while all of her other friends from pre-k go on to kindergarten.
Any advice?
My older dd's bd is August 29th. I was strongly encouraged by the school & the district to hold her back a year b/c "the younger children invariably fail," & a bunch of other negative comments like that. Despite their advice, her preschool teachers felt that we should start her & we did last year. She was the youngest child in her kindergarten class by far, but she did awesome. She is very strong willed & did fine socially & tested advanced on everything that they tested them on. I am very glad that we didn't hold her back b/c I think that she would have been bored. She's in first grade now & doing just fine.
The problem that I'm running into is that my younger dd's bd is Sept. 27th, so she cannot start at almost 5, like her sister did. However, she is significantly beyond where her sister was academically at 3-4 y/o & I am truly worried that she is going to be bored if she is the oldest kid in her class.
I could put her in private kindergarten at the school where she attends pre-k, but we can't afford to keep her there permanently & the public school has told me that they will make her repeat a grade if we try to sneak her in this way & they transfer her to public. I am also worried that, if we do not do kindergarten at 5 & keep her in two years of pre-k, she is going to feel like she is being kept back, while all of her other friends from pre-k go on to kindergarten.
Any advice?





:
Aren't there laws that a school needs to provide accomidations? I mean, if you had a genius child on your hands would there be *no* transfers out of age level grade? I'm just confused by the stance of "never" since they obviously have to at times, I would think 
-
), I am sure that they have to have some accommodations. We haven't gotten that far yet. I suspect that they are toeing the line b/c they want to have the same rules for everyone & they don't want us difficult parents to try to get around their rules. Maybe they would skip the kids ahead at a later date, if warranted, but I am not even thinking that far yet. I am just worrying about her being bored in kindergarten for 2 yrs (one private & one public) or feeling left behind in pre-k for 2 yrs.
Don't some states offer testing for children really close to the cut-off?
Follow Mothering