Danaalex, I am so sorry to hear you say your mother insists that you didn't "bond" when you were an infant. Ugh. That has got to be really, really hard to hear.
Part of why I'm sensitive this is that my mom makes the same claim about my sister -- but both of us are her biological children. My sister was born very ill and had to be hospitalized for a few weeks. My parents lived about an hour and a half from the hospital, so my mom had virtually no contact with my sister all that time.
My mother claims that she and my sister have never been "close" because my sister "bonded" with the nurses instead of her. And, as her story goes, that's why my sister cried for a year, and why my mother could not console her. I am skeptical in the extreme. Maybe the crying was my sister "pining" for the nurses in the hospital (doubt it!!), maybe she had troubles with the formula, maybe she had a problem with my mom virtually ignoring her, who knows? But it grieves me to think that my mother's decision that it was "too late" for her to bond was a self-fullfilling prophesy, you know?
I've learned recently that it was something of a mini trend in the sixties for people to think about infant-parent bonding in this very narrow way, and it may have stemmed from some contemporary research into how certain birds "imprint" on the first creature they see. That creature, bird or not, becomes the mother. End of subject. But humans aren't birds! Attachment is much more complex in humans, and has much more to do with an infant getting his/her needs met consistently. It can happen well after birth, as most of the adoptive parents in this forum know!
Okay, rant over.
Part of why I'm sensitive this is that my mom makes the same claim about my sister -- but both of us are her biological children. My sister was born very ill and had to be hospitalized for a few weeks. My parents lived about an hour and a half from the hospital, so my mom had virtually no contact with my sister all that time.
My mother claims that she and my sister have never been "close" because my sister "bonded" with the nurses instead of her. And, as her story goes, that's why my sister cried for a year, and why my mother could not console her. I am skeptical in the extreme. Maybe the crying was my sister "pining" for the nurses in the hospital (doubt it!!), maybe she had troubles with the formula, maybe she had a problem with my mom virtually ignoring her, who knows? But it grieves me to think that my mother's decision that it was "too late" for her to bond was a self-fullfilling prophesy, you know?
I've learned recently that it was something of a mini trend in the sixties for people to think about infant-parent bonding in this very narrow way, and it may have stemmed from some contemporary research into how certain birds "imprint" on the first creature they see. That creature, bird or not, becomes the mother. End of subject. But humans aren't birds! Attachment is much more complex in humans, and has much more to do with an infant getting his/her needs met consistently. It can happen well after birth, as most of the adoptive parents in this forum know!
Okay, rant over.








the "not bonding" idea that she has doesn't really get to me. my mom is an over reactor LOL. she thinks that if you don't agree with her you are against her. SHE has a lot of issues, that are all hers, all her own. most of the rest of the family doesn't agree with her. except her mom, my grandmother ALWAYS sides with my mom and has the same judgemental, over reactive emotions, and issues. they are both a little crazy.

Follow Mothering