I just received this in my email box; please lend Kirsten your support. The implications of this decision could be far reaching. I don't know if our Birth Center could continue to attend VBACs if this is decided against Kirsten. I don't know if this would limit lay midwives as well, as they are not covered under the nurse practice act, naturally. However, my concern would be that attending an out of hospital VBAC will be labled as practicing medicine without a license, which would then have implications for the direct entry midwives of Kansas
I would also like to add that we are seeing a huge shift in the state of Kansas in regards to VBAC policy. To my knowledge, on the hospital in Lawrence, the hospitals in Wichita, and the hospitals in KC are attending VBACs; for the rest of the state, once a section, always a section. This is terrible, and it looks like it is going to get worse before it gets better. Please, lend us in Kansas your support. We need it!
Thank you, ladies. I know I can always count on you!
Lori Strecker
www.topekabirthcenter.com
If you have any questions, you can contact me at lorijds@yahoo.com
========================
Kirsten Miller wrote:
The first person I told about this, via email,*was Eva Gavin.* At that time I asked her to keep it to herself until I was ready, if ever, to "go public".* I am glad that ICAN knew of the situation as I appreciate their support.* I am glad that my need for privacy was honored in that my name was not used.
*
At this point, 3 weeks later, I am ready for it to go public, as I think there is much to be gained and/or lost for the women of Kansas who have ever had a cesarean section.* My attorney is a Christian man who is of the mind that the board of nursing may choose to set a precedent in their decision in this case.* And I'm thinking, even if they don't know it, IT WILL set a precedent, whichever way they decide.* I don't mind if this information is distributed to the midwifery community because I think it is important for women to take action.
*
The Board of Nursing is responsible for investigating any complaints they receive about a nurse licensed in the state of Kansas.* They received a complaint that I attended an out of hospital trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC).* I did.* The letter I received stated that the BON had received information that I "may have violated the Kansas Nurse Practice Act" by attending the attempted out of hospital VBAC.*This is not illegal as CNMs may practice in the home setting, as long as they are practicing in collaboration with a physician who has, with the CNM,*mutually adopted practice guidelines.* These requirements were met.
However, our local hospitals don't offer VBAC.* At issue is" Should a CNM be allowed to do so out of hospital?* I think this is a turf war.* Or perhaps the complaint was filed to scare me.
*
The BON has the responsibility to collect all pertinent information to the case and make a decision about what, if any, discipline will be administered to the nurse. (me)
*
I would like to ask for support from the ICAN and midwifery community.* If anyone is so inclined, they may contact the primary investigator to respectfully give their opinion about how the case should be decided.* I believe that the decision to have an out of hospital VBAC should be made between a woman and her health care provider.* If the BON decides that CNMs may no longer attend out of hospital VBACs, it severely limits patients choices.* It takes away their right to have a midwife who has hospital privileges and who can continue to provide care for them if a transfer becomes necessary.* I don't think out of hospital VBAC is a good idea for every woman, but I do think the decision should be made on an individual basis, depending on many factors.* I would hate to see it become impossible for a woman in Topeka*to choose vaginal birth in a safe environment.* The only reason I offer it to carefully selected women is because the only hospital choice Topeka women currently have is repeat cesarean, a major surgery with inherent risks.
*
I would appreciate your prayers for me personally as well as the outcome of the investigation.
*
The investigator's name is Karen Peschka, RN.* She can be contacted at:
karen.peschka@ksbn.state.ks.us
785-296-2696
*
My only 2 requests are this:
*
1.* If any of the contents of this email are forwarded or discussed, please forward my*entire email message so that it doesn't turn into rumor.
*
2.* If anyone contacts Ms. Peschka, please be respectful.* I don't want an outpouring of support to get nasty and sour their opinion of midwifery.
*
Thanks,
*
Kirsten Miller, RN, MSN
Certified Nurse Midwife
keeping birth normal
www.topekamidwife.com
785-845-4328
I would also like to add that we are seeing a huge shift in the state of Kansas in regards to VBAC policy. To my knowledge, on the hospital in Lawrence, the hospitals in Wichita, and the hospitals in KC are attending VBACs; for the rest of the state, once a section, always a section. This is terrible, and it looks like it is going to get worse before it gets better. Please, lend us in Kansas your support. We need it!
Thank you, ladies. I know I can always count on you!
Lori Strecker
www.topekabirthcenter.com
If you have any questions, you can contact me at lorijds@yahoo.com
========================
Kirsten Miller wrote:
The first person I told about this, via email,*was Eva Gavin.* At that time I asked her to keep it to herself until I was ready, if ever, to "go public".* I am glad that ICAN knew of the situation as I appreciate their support.* I am glad that my need for privacy was honored in that my name was not used.
*
At this point, 3 weeks later, I am ready for it to go public, as I think there is much to be gained and/or lost for the women of Kansas who have ever had a cesarean section.* My attorney is a Christian man who is of the mind that the board of nursing may choose to set a precedent in their decision in this case.* And I'm thinking, even if they don't know it, IT WILL set a precedent, whichever way they decide.* I don't mind if this information is distributed to the midwifery community because I think it is important for women to take action.
*
The Board of Nursing is responsible for investigating any complaints they receive about a nurse licensed in the state of Kansas.* They received a complaint that I attended an out of hospital trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC).* I did.* The letter I received stated that the BON had received information that I "may have violated the Kansas Nurse Practice Act" by attending the attempted out of hospital VBAC.*This is not illegal as CNMs may practice in the home setting, as long as they are practicing in collaboration with a physician who has, with the CNM,*mutually adopted practice guidelines.* These requirements were met.
However, our local hospitals don't offer VBAC.* At issue is" Should a CNM be allowed to do so out of hospital?* I think this is a turf war.* Or perhaps the complaint was filed to scare me.
*
The BON has the responsibility to collect all pertinent information to the case and make a decision about what, if any, discipline will be administered to the nurse. (me)
*
I would like to ask for support from the ICAN and midwifery community.* If anyone is so inclined, they may contact the primary investigator to respectfully give their opinion about how the case should be decided.* I believe that the decision to have an out of hospital VBAC should be made between a woman and her health care provider.* If the BON decides that CNMs may no longer attend out of hospital VBACs, it severely limits patients choices.* It takes away their right to have a midwife who has hospital privileges and who can continue to provide care for them if a transfer becomes necessary.* I don't think out of hospital VBAC is a good idea for every woman, but I do think the decision should be made on an individual basis, depending on many factors.* I would hate to see it become impossible for a woman in Topeka*to choose vaginal birth in a safe environment.* The only reason I offer it to carefully selected women is because the only hospital choice Topeka women currently have is repeat cesarean, a major surgery with inherent risks.
*
I would appreciate your prayers for me personally as well as the outcome of the investigation.
*
The investigator's name is Karen Peschka, RN.* She can be contacted at:
karen.peschka@ksbn.state.ks.us
785-296-2696
*
My only 2 requests are this:
*
1.* If any of the contents of this email are forwarded or discussed, please forward my*entire email message so that it doesn't turn into rumor.
*
2.* If anyone contacts Ms. Peschka, please be respectful.* I don't want an outpouring of support to get nasty and sour their opinion of midwifery.
*
Thanks,
*
Kirsten Miller, RN, MSN
Certified Nurse Midwife
keeping birth normal
www.topekamidwife.com
785-845-4328






