post #481 of 601
10/8/06 at 8:18am
Thank you for this thread.
|
I just read most of this thread and I wish I had read it two years ago when I was pregnant with Ani. I would have noticed I had most of the warning signs of pre-e. I had a pain in my upper right abdomen that I thought was the baby's feet poking me in the ribs. It never occured to me that it might be my liver. I was induced at 40 weeks and had a small, 5lbs 14oz healthy baby.
I'm now pregnant with #2 and hoping and praying for a homebirth this time. Is there anything I can do to avoid pre-e this time? I plan to start doing some kind of exercise soon, but would that make my bp go up? Should I be monitering my pb? urine? I'm really hoping that there is somethind I can do to be proactive about this. Gossomer, I am so deeply sorry for your loss. I can't fathom the pain. Thank you for this thread. |
|
I've been reading this thread since last Thursday (have made it thru pg.7) when my bp went from a normal 100/70 to 130/90 and I had 2+ protein in my urine. Today I went for a follow up with my mw, my bp is still high and my protein is now 3+. My mw is turning my care over to an ob she works closely with because of the concern of pre-e, and she has ruled out my possibility of a homebirth...
A few questions for those of you with experience. The two above symptoms plus no change in my hemoglobin are my only major symptoms. I have swelling, but it has not moved to my face or hands. Today, my swelling has been primarily in my left leg only, is this normal? Is there anything else that could cause these symptoms? I am 35.5 weeks and others in my due date club have mentioned that true pre-e usually shows signs earlier? Also, from what I have read so far, it seems many mommas were induced at 37 wks. Why is this? Is it because their bp spiked too high? If my bp maintains at its new higher level, will my ob still want to induce and/or schedule a c-section? I am afraid of being induced with pitocin if my body is not ready, then laboring for too long and ending up with a c-section. I don't see why if the ob feels I need to be induced, why should I not decline and just go immediately to c-section if there is any danger for me or the baby? Why go thru a struggling labor and open the door for more drugs if my body is not ready? Any advice you all can offer would be appreciated! |
|
I've been reading this thread since last Thursday (have made it thru pg.7) when my bp went from a normal 100/70 to 130/90 and I had 2+ protein in my urine. Today I went for a follow up with my mw, my bp is still high and my protein is now 3+. My mw is turning my care over to an ob she works closely with because of the concern of pre-e, and she has ruled out my possibility of a homebirth...
A few questions for those of you with experience. The two above symptoms plus no change in my hemoglobin are my only major symptoms. I have swelling, but it has not moved to my face or hands. Today, my swelling has been primarily in my left leg only, is this normal? Is there anything else that could cause these symptoms? I am 35.5 weeks and others in my due date club have mentioned that true pre-e usually shows signs earlier? Also, from what I have read so far, it seems many mommas were induced at 37 wks. Why is this? Is it because their bp spiked too high? If my bp maintains at its new higher level, will my ob still want to induce and/or schedule a c-section? I am afraid of being induced with pitocin if my body is not ready, then laboring for too long and ending up with a c-section. I don't see why if the ob feels I need to be induced, why should I not decline and just go immediately to c-section if there is any danger for me or the baby? Why go thru a struggling labor and open the door for more drugs if my body is not ready? Any advice you all can offer would be appreciated! |
Thankfully, the steroids had time to take and he just had to get bigger and keep his temp up, came home after only 17 days in the NICU.
| Authors' conclusions Calcium supplementation appears to almost halve the risk of pre-eclampsia, and to reduce the rare occurrence of the composite outcome 'death or serious morbidity'. There were no other clear benefits, or harms. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plain language summary Calcium supplements help prevent pre-eclampsia, lowers the risk of the woman dying or having serious problems Pre-eclampsia is a major cause of death in pregnant women and newborn babies worldwide. Preterm birth (birth before 37 weeks) is often caused by high blood pressure and is the leading cause of newborn deaths, particularly in low-income countries. The review of trials found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is a safe and relatively cheap means of reducing the risk of pre-eclampsia in women at increased risk, and women from communities with low dietary calcium. Women were also less likely to die or have serious problems due to pre-eclampsia. No adverse effects have been found but further research is needed into the ideal dosage for supplementation. |
| Authors' conclusions These results should be interpreted with caution, as most of the data come from poor quality studies. Nevertheless, antioxidant supplementation seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. There also appears to be a reduction in the risk of having a small-for-gestational-age baby associated with antioxidants, although there is an increase in the risk of preterm birth. Several large trials are ongoing, and the results of these are needed before antioxidants can be recommended for clinical practice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plain language summary Antioxidants in pregnancy, like vitamin C and vitamin E, for preventing pre-eclampsia Pre-eclampsia can occur during pregnancy when women have high blood pressure and protein in their urine. In some cases, it can lead to serious complications for women and babies, including mortality. A possible contributing factor to the development of pre-eclampsia may be the presence of excessive amounts of chemicals called 'free radicals'. Antioxidants, such as vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium and lycopene, can neutralize free radicals and may help prevent pre-eclampsia. The review of trials found studies of not the best quality, which indicated antioxidants might reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. However, although antioxidants appeared to reduce the risk of having a small baby, there was an increase in the risk of the baby being born too soon. Further studies are needed to confirm whether or not antioxidants do more good than harm. Several trials are currently in progress on this topic. |
|
I'm on a little bit of info overload after reading 25 pages of this thread in one night, so I want someone to double check my plans here.
So. I want to get a baseline 24 hour urine and liver panel. Ask about potentially testing for clotting disorders. Dig out my home BP monitor and make sure the cuff is big enough. And in the "couldn't hurt, might help" category, think about eating more protein and supplementing with extra folic acid, Vit C, and...? I know I'm forgetting something here. And exercise. Perfect timing, the weather's getting good to walk! I've obviously got time to decide, but any thoughts on VBA2C vs scheduled c-section as far as how it relates to the pre-e? I am really undecided on this one. In a perfect world, I'd want the VBA2C, but alas, this is not a perfect world. Much love and peace and health to those expecting! If I can be of any help, or anyone wants to know more about my experiences, please don't hesitate to ask. |



Follow Mothering