Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Parenting › Bed and Nighttime Parenting › must-read article for everyone who visits this forum
New Posts  All Forums:
 

must-read article for everyone who visits this forum

post #1 of 36
Thread Starter 
Everyone, please read this article!!! I know it's an old one, I haven't seen any sleep articles lately in Mothering mag, but I'll keep looking and see if I can find one....

http://www.mothering.com/articles/ne...ep/fleiss.html

Quote:
Many of the so-called "sleep problems" that parents report in their children are actually the result of rigid and unreasonable expectations that are based on unnatural and unrealistic myths about how children are supposed to be. The incorrect advice on sleep that is found in so many childcare books is based on such expectations.

Babies, however, cannot be tricked into yielding to unreasonable expectations. The baby's refusal to cooperate with feeding schedules and rigid "training" indicates that these expectations are unnatural and don't meet the baby's biological needs.
post #2 of 36
Great article!

I also found reading the book Our Babies, Ourselves helped give me more realistic expectations about sleeping. Other cultures seem to handle it so much more level-headedly than Americans do.
post #3 of 36
Thread Starter 
Here are some more I found, but not at Mothering:
http://www.naturalchild.org/articles/sleeping.html


http://www.naturalchild.org/tine_the..._vs_habit.html
Quote:
The wants of a well-adjusted human being are his needs. It is when his needs are not fulfilled that his wants become excessive in the attempt to fulfill suppressed needs.

...

Hymes, in his book Child under Six, describes a habit as an action which can easily be broken. "If you run into any major difficulty at all," he writes, "Beware! You are probably not dealing with an old outworn habit. The chances are that you are tampering with a human need."

...

For some strange reason we tend to think that to satisfy a child's need is to make it into an unbreakable habit, where in truth the exact opposite is true.
post #4 of 36
I didn't read the article, just the quotes, but I agree anyway. I know that I'm still the same as I ever was; never wanted to sleep, always felt I was missing out on something. Was the last in the house to go to sleep, last at the slumber party to close my eyes. Still am! It's just who I was, and who I am.

I'm very very glad my mom never imposed her will on me by "training" me. Who knows who I'd be if it weren't for all those late nights?

Just looked it up, and I've been staying up late enough to watch Saturday Night Live since the day before I turned 6. Yep, since its premiere.

(for those of you who might be aghast, an innocent kid doesn't even get that the jokes are dirty sometimes unless adults are acting like they're dirty. i had a whole different understanding of many SNL sketches than their reality...once I started watching re-runs as an adult I could still remember what I thought they were about, and I was shocked that the sketches were so naughty!)
post #5 of 36
Thread Starter 
bump
post #6 of 36
Oooh thank you I forwarded that to so many people! Good article.. much needed.
post #7 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by stafl
Everyone, please read this article!!! I know it's an old one, I haven't seen any sleep articles lately in Mothering mag, but I'll keep looking and see if I can find one....

http://www.mothering.com/articles/ne...ep/fleiss.html
This article makes ALL KINDS of claims! Something is not true just because the author says so - where is the data?

Please understand, I am TOTALLY AGAINST using CIO in any form - my 1yo wakes up several times a night and I am right there with him. But, this article is only going to appeal to those who already use the methods described - it has not data that is going to win over someone from the other side, or even someone on the fence :

Quote:
Even with the best of intentions, ignoring children leads them to feel abandoned. The result will be insecure, unhappy children. You cannot "spoil" children by responding to their cries. "Spoiled" children are those who don't know what to expect from their parents. They are often alternately punished or praised for the same activity at different times.
Quote:
While babies may learn to cry themselves to sleep, this practice also seems to have the undesirable effect of teaching babies that they cannot trust their parents to respond to their needs. It also inculcates low self-esteem. Children who cannot trust their parents are emotionally unbalanced. They are abandoned children. To some degree, they will be psychologically impaired and may manifest this by being clingy, needy, whiny, and demanding.
Hey, it's not as if I disagree that leaving my child to CIO could lead to them feeling more insecure and affecting them long-term, but there all kinds of claims here that are not backed up in any way.

The studies on this topic may be limited, but at least quote the ones that exist to support claims.
post #8 of 36
Right on! I have read it before, and I love it! Thanks for pinning it.
post #9 of 36
I have to agree with Kay.
I know a woman who did CIO because that's what she was taught was best. Her kids have grown up to be well adjusted, secure, independent and nurturing adults. Her son is LITERALLY a "rocket scientist" and is politically active and her daughter is a graphic designer and figure skater who works with special needs children in her spare time. They come home to be with their parents on a regular basis and have fond memories of their childhood.

I feel bad for this mother when I think of her sitting outside her baby's door, crying, waiting for the baby to stop screaming and go to sleep. Its terrible that she thought she had to do this. I'm sure it was awful for mom, dad and baby and its a wacked practice... but the damage tends to get exagerated. It doesn't destroy a child. There are worse things. For example, if parents were to divorce over cosleeping, that would affect a childhood more than CIO, in my opinion.

Anyway, what Kay said. We should just let people know its not necessary and what the alternatives are. Lets see some studies! Beyond statistics too (good stats tend to find little proof against any sleep arrangement). I'd love to know if, say, GW Bush cried it out.. or if Ghandi did (doubt it).. or Trump.. or Madonna.. or MLK.. That would be interesting.

Speculations that are so easy to argue just hurt the case against CIO.

Julie
post #10 of 36
I posted a link to this forum in another group I belong too, when a bunch of the moms were doing CIO. The mom I intended it for never responded, but another mom was so excited about the linky. She was happy to know that she *didn't* have to CIO and *could* pick up her baby when she cried.
post #11 of 36

sleep? please define.

Hi! My daughter Fenix is almost 6 months old, she's breastfeeding and wakes up a few times each night to feed. So often I catch myself wondering if I'm doing something wrong, why isn't she sleeping through the night? So much data out there is based on formula feeding, and so many other parents, doctors and society in general put out expectations for sleeping straight through.

I'm new to this forum, but it's refreshing to see the other side supported here.

I have yet to read the article in question, but I also agree with Kay that without good support, a strongly opinionated article doesn't do much to convince me what's best as a parent. Sometimes I react emotionally, but upon consideration, I need proof.

(By the way Kay, my dd is named Fenix - the middle English spelling)
post #12 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by musemama
(By the way Kay, my dd is named Fenix - the middle English spelling)

How COOL!!! I love it! You're the only other mama of a Phoenix/Fenix that I've met. We named ours for the mythological bird that rises from its own ashes, what made you choose the name?
post #13 of 36

Re: CIO vs responding to baby

I can totally see where it would be very helpful to have statistics to back us up on the theory that it's better to respond to our babies than to let them CIO. But where are the statistics that say it's better to CIO? Granted, it does seem that more health care practitioners recommend CIO, but where is the evidence that it works?? I agree with sovereignqueen- some mamas seem to just need to hear it's okay to respond to their baby when he cries. Especially if their pedi/friends/relatives are telling them not to. And remember-statistic can be deceiving too. I don't rely so much on statistics as I do on my Mama instincts- those I know I can trust. They are only biased in favor of my babies!

Off to post an intro now- I'm new 'round these parts
post #14 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by southerngul
I can totally see where it would be very helpful to have statistics to back us up on the theory that it's better to respond to our babies than to let them CIO. But where are the statistics that say it's better to CIO? Granted, it does seem that more health care practitioners recommend CIO, but where is the evidence that it works?? I agree with sovereignqueen- some mamas seem to just need to hear it's okay to respond to their baby when he cries. Especially if their pedi/friends/relatives are telling them not to. And remember-statistic can be deceiving too. I don't rely so much on statistics as I do on my Mama instincts- those I know I can trust. They are only biased in favor of my babies!

Off to post an intro now- I'm new 'round these parts
I work with medical statistics for my job. And I can tell you there are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

I've looked into the sleep "research" and it is all so biased that it is impossible to judge anything. Like- one study compared separate room from birth to cosleeping families. They asked parents about their kid's habits. Of course, the CIO'ers reported their kids fell asleep fast, stay asleep, are not scared, etc.

The thing is- how would they know? They are in another room. These studies that back up CIO don't actually put cameras in the baby's room, they rely on parent' reports. And these parents need to justify their prectices by claiming their kids sleep. I've been to the houses of CIO parents. I hear their kids crying. I know that when these parents tell me their kids sleep fine, they are full of it.

There are also pro-cosleeping studie which are also often methodologically flawed in other ways.

The problem with sleep studies is there are no long term studies (those are very expensive and difficult to do.) they are often based on parental reports and the result are cooked, cooked, cooked.

I'd love to see some good, non biased sleep research on kids, but I'm not holding my breath. People want to raise their kids in a way that fulfills their own ideas about life. They don't really want to know the truth.
post #15 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by awnja
I have to agree with Kay.
I know a woman who did CIO because that's what she was taught was best. Her kids have grown up to be well adjusted, secure, independent and nurturing adults. Her son is LITERALLY a "rocket scientist" and is politically active and her daughter is a graphic designer and figure skater who works with special needs children in her spare time. They come home to be with their parents on a regular basis and have fond memories of their childhood.

I feel bad for this mother when I think of her sitting outside her baby's door, crying, waiting for the baby to stop screaming and go to sleep. Its terrible that she thought she had to do this. I'm sure it was awful for mom, dad and baby and its a wacked practice... but the damage tends to get exagerated. It doesn't destroy a child. There are worse things. For example, if parents were to divorce over cosleeping, that would affect a childhood more than CIO, in my opinion.

Anyway, what Kay said. We should just let people know its not necessary and what the alternatives are. Lets see some studies! Beyond statistics too (good stats tend to find little proof against any sleep arrangement). I'd love to know if, say, GW Bush cried it out.. or if Ghandi did (doubt it).. or Trump.. or Madonna.. or MLK.. That would be interesting.

Speculations that are so easy to argue just hurt the case against CIO.

Julie
I think there are good parents who CIO, spank, etc. I don't agree with the practices, but some people are good parents and do them.

That said, I think CIO is the beginning of detached parenting for many and leads to worse parenting because of that.

I wanted to mention something in response to your post.

I know a lot of people who talk about the threat of divorce in relationship to night time parenting. I even have one friend who worried that her marriage may be over one night she slept in a separate bed to co-sleep with her dd.

Now- a man who acted as my surrogate grandfather is from the Sudan. His wife and three kids lived in the Sudan while he worked in the US the majority of his adult life. He returned there maybe every other year for a few weeks. Now in late life his family has joined him and they are happy to be together full time.

How can I explain to this man, who sacrificed everything for his family, that many American couples simply can't stay married if they can't sleep together every night, alone, without interruption.

This man thinks it's funny that Americans need a bed to sleep! He thinks I'm spoiled because I have to have running hot water.

What kind of crazy culture do we have where are relationships are so weak? How can we be so reluctant to sacrifice for our children? How would I explain this to a person on the other side of the world who works 12 hours a day and comed home to a matt on the floor and a 1 bdroom house with 5 kids in it that I'm just "too tired" to hold my 2 year old if she is sad?

I think CIO is bad for parents! It gives them a reason to be closed off from their families and selfish. Why do we want a life like that?
post #16 of 36

nak

Quote:
Originally Posted by mommyofshmoo
People want to raise their kids in a way that fulfills their own ideas about life. They don't really want to know the truth.
This is so true. ime most parents that have cio don't want to hear about the alternatives. the same goes for breastfeeding.
post #17 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by awnja
... but the damage tends to get exagerated. It doesn't destroy a child. There are worse things. For example, if parents were to divorce over cosleeping, that would affect a childhood more than CIO, in my opinion.
Julie
you know what, i agree with the points about needing stats to back up the claims,and i believe there are people out there who did fine despite having had their communication and needs ignored as infants and children. BUT i think that, as has been said, cannot paint all with the same brush. i am sure there ARE kids out there who have been harmed by CIO, perhaps they were not as adaptive, or their parents weren't nurturing them in other ways, too. hard to say.

post #18 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by mommyofshmoo
I think there are good parents who CIO, spank, etc. I don't agree with the practices, but some people are good parents and do them.

That said, I think CIO is the beginning of detached parenting for many and leads to worse parenting because of that.

I wanted to mention something in response to your post.

I know a lot of people who talk about the threat of divorce in relationship to night time parenting. I even have one friend who worried that her marriage may be over one night she slept in a separate bed to co-sleep with her dd.

Now- a man who acted as my surrogate grandfather is from the Sudan. His wife and three kids lived in the Sudan while he worked in the US the majority of his adult life. He returned there maybe every other year for a few weeks. Now in late life his family has joined him and they are happy to be together full time.

How can I explain to this man, who sacrificed everything for his family, that many American couples simply can't stay married if they can't sleep together every night, alone, without interruption.

This man thinks it's funny that Americans need a bed to sleep! He thinks I'm spoiled because I have to have running hot water.

What kind of crazy culture do we have where are relationships are so weak? How can we be so reluctant to sacrifice for our children? How would I explain this to a person on the other side of the world who works 12 hours a day and comed home to a matt on the floor and a 1 bdroom house with 5 kids in it that I'm just "too tired" to hold my 2 year old if she is sad?

I think CIO is bad for parents! It gives them a reason to be closed off from their families and selfish. Why do we want a life like that?
WOW!!!!!!! That is a really great point! Really, its the "detached" parents who are the spoiled brats, huh?

I agree that there are many good families using CIO simply because they feel they must. And because they are tired. The "authorities" don't "approve" of co-sleeping, but for goodness sake, if it were shown to be an option for tired new mummies, how much more rested would they be!!!!

BTDT BOTH ways, and thus my crusade is to give mothers CHOICE.
post #19 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunMama
This is so true. ime most parents that have cio don't want to hear about the alternatives. the same goes for breastfeeding.
ITA with this!
post #20 of 36
I just wanted to say that recently I started to do the "Super Nanny" sleep technique...It requires you to place your child in bed and sit facing away from them not reacting to anything they do or say one word and when they got outta bed you gently placed them back to bed. Well I will be the first to admit we tried this for 2 full weeks. It was TERRIBLE! My daughter would just sob and cry until she calmed down and fell asleep...then when it would be bed time she sobbed and cried!! It got to the point where she fought naps for 2hrs and then when it was time for me to get up she would wake up immed. and cry for me to sit next to her bed. I finally told dh that something was up. Keep in mind that our daughter has co-slept from day ONE. We just couldn't get any rest with all her kicking and such in bed so we thought we would try this..Well now we have changed our minds. This was a TERRIBLE thing to put her through and ourselves. We were pulling her away from us and it was scary for us all. We now place her in her bed to sleep but CUDDLE with her until she is asleep and slip outta her bed. When she wakes up at night we go CUDDLE up with her and SING to her and let her know we are here for her. NOT IGNORING her and we feel MUCH better about it!! I have let my daughter cry for an hour in her room and I will be honest...I did it because I thought it needed to be done. My daughter turns 2 next week and I'm devastated that I believed that the super nanny sleep technique would work for us and I'm appalled that I even agreed to try it!! I am a proud mama who co-sleeps and if our daughter needs to be in bed with us inside of snuggling in her bed then she is welcome

Mandi
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Bed and Nighttime Parenting
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Parenting › Bed and Nighttime Parenting › must-read article for everyone who visits this forum