With all respect, the issue is more than why the authors were not published, it is why a topic that so many people here are interested in is repeatedly passed over. I understand that articles etc are scheduled far in advance, but why is this topic not scheduled in after that. Or even better, bumped up due to the readerships' interest!
Please, Please have Peggy look at the interest that these boards have generated. Please listen to the numerous people who attest to the wonderful, AP-style of parenting that EC promotes. Finally, please listen to those parents who wish that a magazine such as Mothering would step forward and show mothers that there is another parenting tool that can help them tune into there child and respond to ALL their needs. As far as I am concerned this is not controversal topic, it is just misunderstood. A letter to the editor printed in 1989 does not serve the readership of Mothering magazine.
I will forward this to the email provided.
Please, Please have Peggy look at the interest that these boards have generated. Please listen to the numerous people who attest to the wonderful, AP-style of parenting that EC promotes. Finally, please listen to those parents who wish that a magazine such as Mothering would step forward and show mothers that there is another parenting tool that can help them tune into there child and respond to ALL their needs. As far as I am concerned this is not controversal topic, it is just misunderstood. A letter to the editor printed in 1989 does not serve the readership of Mothering magazine.
I will forward this to the email provided.











Let's hope they get enough requests and will do an article...




Didn't know baby boys could do that.)

: dd does not keep her top part under the covers at night and when we"ve tried no diaper, she gets whatever she's wearing soaked. hmmm