Mothering › Forums › Parenting › What do you think about baby modeling?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What do you think about baby modeling?  

post #1 of 21
Thread Starter 
Okay, so this might be a weird question, but my inner voice is conflicted and I need some opinions.

I've been told about a thousand times that I should have DD do some baby modeling. My initial reaction was thanks but no thanks. I felt like doing something like that was unfair to her, since she would have no say in if she was doing it or not. BUT... the more I think about it, the more conflicted I am.

My main concern is that DD can't decide for herself if she wants to do it. Now here's the conflict: isn't that true for everything we do with our babes. They are sort at our mercy most of the time, right? So if she wasn't crying in protest (I would never force a crying/unhappy baby to pose for the camera!) would it be so bad to have some photos taken of her?

On the practical side, it sure would be awesome to make a little money for her from modeling and put away for her college/future. Am I missing the way that this would be a bad thing?

My neighbor had her kids do some modeling with a small agency that does local catalogs and ads - pretty small scale and low-key. She said it was a good experience all around. The babies enjoyed it, they made some college money, and as they grew up, they loved seeing themselves in print (mom saved the prints, of course ) Any one out there had or know of some NOT so good experiences? Am I being naive about this?

Let me also say, I would NEVER in a zillion years put her in a pageant of ANY kind, nor would I push the modeling if she seems at all unhappy with it. She's a pretty mellow and content baby for the most part, so it would become very clear to me very quickly if she were not happy with the situation, and I would never chalk her crying up to "oh, that's just her fussing".

Care to share your thoughts with a conflicted mama?
post #2 of 21
I have no problem with it.
what's some photos ? what if a Dept. store wanted to use your babe in a shoot? I would do it.

many will say it's bad. You're right about us making decisions all the time for our kids.
Sometimes we might have our kids try an activity to give it a shot to see if they like it.
Some kids need a little tap to try something & then they love it.
My DD did a little '"runway" a few times & then told me she did not want to do it anymore - OK fine!
One photo studio wanted to use 1 of her baby shots as a demo & i thought that was so cool.
Some of my Hi school Grad pics were used as display for the studio & photographer.

I will be in a minority here on MDC but in the end..... it's your babe & you know whats ok for your family

HTH
post #3 of 21
I thought about doing this when dd was a baby for all the reasons you mentioned. We live close to NYC so the oppurtunities were there (one person I know has her dd on one of the soaps).

I eventually decided against it - I decided to be a SAHM to spend time with my dd & didn't want to be on a schedule. It seemed like you had to be 'on-call' a lot of the time & the agency would use people that were consistently available.

I also looked at what they were advertising, specifically diapers & formula, and could not in good conscience let her be a 'spokesperson' for the things I didn't like or use. I'm against a lot of the commercialism & mass marketing that goes on & didn't want her to be a cog in that wheel. It would make me feel like a hypocrite.

Just my $.02.
post #4 of 21
I'm interested in the answers to this questiion. I have a friend who just signed up her 7 month old to do this, and am wondering what other moms think.

I don't have kids yet. but my first reaction is NO... I wouldn't do it.
post #5 of 21
I know a girl who paid for her entire college education with child modeling/ commercial money. If your DD has the right attitude for it (likes having her picture taken, her hair and clothes being fussed with, likes strangers, doesn't cry much) why not try it?

My kids are all wackos, it would never work with them.

editing to add that I just remembered DS went to an Anne Geddies (sp) "audition" when he was a newborn. My midwife told me they wanted interracial babies. I didn't want to do it but DH was totally into it. So we went. I hated it! There were all these bitchy, pushy moms there with babies being filled up with formula. Even though DS is interracial he came out looking white. They took one look at him, politely took his picture, and said they'd be in touch. They wanted darker babies.

I came out of the whole experience feeling smarmy and weird, but DH loved it.
post #6 of 21
I’ve considered it to finance a trip to Japan (the pay is good there and work for kids is easy to find). I don’t know how far I would take the fantasy but I’m not radically against it, obviously!
post #7 of 21
My son did some modeling last year; we'd have done more, they really loved him, but it was too much work in my third trimester, and then we were making all these trips to doctors with BooBah.

At this point, we're going to wait until he's a little older, and then if he wants to do more we will. He still loves having his picture taken, posing, smiling, people fussing over his hair and clothing... he's just a total sponge for the attention. :LOL He thinks it's great fun, and he's very photogenic and sociable. People love working with him.

The most important thing to know about baby modeling is that the temperament of the child is *much* more important than their looks. My son is absolutely beautiful (IMNSHO ) but if he didn't like people fussing over him, and got overstimulated or nervous around strangers it never would have worked out. Funny looking babies who take direction and stay relaxed will always work more than beautiful babies who are tense and unhappy if they're not in their mother's arms.

Anyway, I'm not against it at all, as long as you're paying attention to your child's needs and wishes. If the kid likes posing and smiling for pictures anyway, what's the harm in letting them get paid for it?
post #8 of 21
Why not wait until your baby is older and then ask if she wants to do it? Not all child models have to start when they are babies.

If there is any money going to the parents, I'd call it unethical. If the money is all for the child, and it's the child's idea/desire to do it, then no problem, assuming the child can change her mind at any time.
post #9 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greaseball
If there is any money going to the parents, I'd call it unethical. If the money is all for the child, and it's the child's idea/desire to do it, then no problem, assuming the child can change her mind at any time.
There's actually a law that the kids have to have a savings account before they can even go on auditions; all the money goes to them.
post #10 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by eilonwy
There's actually a law that the kids have to have a savings account before they can even go on auditions; all the money goes to them.

There's no such law in PA, New York, or NJ... so I'm a little confused, since you're a PA mama, right?

My older DD did some modeling as a babe. She did a little print work and we did a few movies together as extras. It was fun, but she started getting cranky. She has never really enjoys having her picture taken.

Did I put all the money aside for her?
Pah!
It really doesn't pay much, per gig, and most of what we got went back into transportation. Did I spend the rest on her? No doubt I did. I spend almost all my money on my kids, afterall.
post #11 of 21
eilonwy, were you doing TV stuff?
The laws are different for print work.
post #12 of 21
I think the time to do it is in infancy. At least their self-esteem is not attached to it so much then. Few children have real memories before the age of three. Any extra money earned; earmark it for the college fund.
post #13 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongLiveLife
There's no such law in PA, New York, or NJ... so I'm a little confused, since you're a PA mama, right?
It's a fairly new law, and it's federal; the kids have to have a certain kind of account to do national work, print or screen. Local things are still independant. At least, this was my understanding of the situation. It could just be the company that BeanBean was with.

And yes, we are in PA.
post #14 of 21
Not too much new to add, except that we had a slightly different perspective as DH works in the photog business and HE was the one saying no way for our DD. Not completely, but as far as I am concerned, if someone sees a pic of her and wants her for a shoot, and she is into it, that is one thing, but he has been around for plenty of roll call days, where the moms and kids line up out the door to test, so to speak, to see if they will be called back for the shoot. We are in NYC, so it might be a bit different than elsewhere. I am so very not into that.

As an aside, he has told me horrible stories about kids on set that obviously didn't want to be there or were just having a bad day and their parents were simply awful to them. I also had the thought in my head that DD would be self-conscious about her looks and think too much of it if we did do modeling.

That said, if you think that it would work for you and your baby, why not try it out? You can always stop if it isn't working.
post #15 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonshine
I also had the thought in my head that DD would be self-conscious about her looks and think too much of it if we did do modeling.


That's exactly why I wanted to do this when she was a babe. So, we have a few shots in her baby book for bragging...
She's 4, now, and she would never go in for it. She makes either the foulest mean faces, for the camera, or the most painfully forced smiles (see my siggy! :LOL ). And that's fine, b/c like you said, I wouldn't want her to think that her value lies in her pretty little face.



Sort of besides the point, but I hafta mention it: just the other day, a bus drove by with one of her ads on the side of it. I live in Lancaster county, and this ad was only used in York, one county over. I don't go there often, so it was the first time I've seen the ad (the pic was done when she was an infant, so it's 4 years old!) I had all but forgotten about it, but there she was: 7 feet tall, driving by, my little butter-ball!
It was precious. Shocking, but precious.
post #16 of 21
If doing this doesn't cause any problems for your baby - meaning she doesn't get fussy or upset or miss naps or spend all her time going to photo shoots instead of being a baby - I don't think there's anything wrong with it.

It's older kids' modeling that I have issues with - mostly with girls, because I think it reinforces the "looks are everything" message that they are bombarded with from an early age. It depends how it's done, though. A kid posing in a catalog on a bicycle is not the same as those horrible Guess Kids ads with little girls made to look sexy. Ugh. I figure a parent is able to judge for herself/himself if a situation is healthy for his/her child or not.
post #17 of 21
My issue w/baby modeling?

From what I have read (not extensively or for research, so please correct me if wrong) but formula fed children are generally preferred. (it is really about personality, but...). They are generally easier to hand off to others (can take a bottle with them) and more portable for strangers.

If you had offers, great. If you're going to be standing around in lines all the time it just wouldn't be worth it for me.
post #18 of 21
I've gotten the same comments since dd was born and I just keep saying "no thanks," even to dh. I see in myself the potential to become the worst kind of stage mother. I don't want the temptation. My parents were constantly putting down this one girl in my high school who was my only competition in the vocal music dept. Now there was no doubt at that stage (before I started operatic training) that she was actually better than I was, and my parents' attitude made me so nervous and jumpy all the time. This poor girl got a 700-something on her SATs, she needed to make her career in music!

I rambled, but my point is that I could become someone awful if I let dd do that.
post #19 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiredX2
My issue w/baby modeling?

From what I have read (not extensively or for research, so please correct me if wrong) but formula fed children are generally preferred. (it is really about personality, but...). They are generally easier to hand off to others (can take a bottle with them) and more portable for strangers.
I specifically asked about this when I took BeanBean in for the very first meeting, and mentioned that not only was he breastfed but that he'd never had a bottle and never would. They actually really like breastfed babies because they're quicker to feed and because their spit up doesn't stain, even if they spit all the time (and they're less likely to in the first place).

I suppose if it was a commercial for formula, it'd be a different story, but they tend to want babies who'll take something out of a bottle as well as a breast (don't even get me started on that! ) and you'd be asked well in advance how your baby was fed.

Quote:
I see in myself the potential to become the worst kind of stage mother. I don't want the temptation.
That's a very good thing to know about yourself.

I worried about it for a little while-- what makes someone become a stage mother? What's the driving force behind it, and can it happen to people with the best of intentions? I even had a good long talk with my husband about it, and we came to the conclusion that I just didn't have that in me, for several reasons, not the least of which being that I was willing to put BeanBean's "career" on an indefinite hiatus while I dealt with pregnancy and a newborn BooBah.
post #20 of 21
Some things I would want to know:
- Is there a contract? Will we be financially or legally punished if my baby refuses to do any more shoots?
- What is the product? Is it something that my baby may obejct to when she grows up?
- Is there anything about the shoot (naked butt, for example) that may embarrass my child when she grows up?
- In the photo, will my baby be encouraged to be herself and play like a normal baby, or will she be asked to sit still in some unnatural position? Will she be asked to do things she normally never does?
- Will she be paid for all time spent in the studio, even if she did not agree to any photos that day?
- If, as a child or adult, my baby objects to having her photo made public, how do I plan to make it up to her? Is there a way to make sure the photos are not used anymore?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Parenting
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Parenting › What do you think about baby modeling?