I hear this criticism a lot from pro-circ parents. They say that we are mean and that we say they are bad parents. They say this is why they do not try to debate circumcision, b/c we do not play fair. I was thinking about this last night, and this is what I came up with:
They do not debate b/c they have no argument that would hold up to scrutiny. If they had something to say that supported RIC, they would say it. Now they say, "We don't debate b/c you are mean." I think this is a cover. If they had anything that would support RIC, I think they would LOVE to deploy it in debate, IF ONLY to shut up the mean intactivists.
I tried to make this point elsewhere and it was ignored. I'd like to say "crickets chirping," but maybe I am being smug. What do you all think?
They do not debate b/c they have no argument that would hold up to scrutiny. If they had something to say that supported RIC, they would say it. Now they say, "We don't debate b/c you are mean." I think this is a cover. If they had anything that would support RIC, I think they would LOVE to deploy it in debate, IF ONLY to shut up the mean intactivists.
I tried to make this point elsewhere and it was ignored. I'd like to say "crickets chirping," but maybe I am being smug. What do you all think?









:


Much nicer to change him with feces rubbing his raw, bloody penis, right?


