Sounds like your pretty basic run of the mill "failure to progress" c-section. I don't see anything about the cord or distress in this email so I'm guessing that wasn't a big factor. Maybe they just originally thought that or someone was confused along the route the info got to you. That email does make me want to hurl but at least a 9 hour trial of labor is somewhat better than the 3-4 hours you were originally told.
post #21 of 21
4/6/05 at 2:24pm