Hello. I recently read a quote and I can't remember where. Could have been here at MDC, Mothering Magazine, Brain, Child - I have no idea. It could have been on the Penn and Teller Bullshit show actually. But I read (or heard) a statement saying that once you see an infant that is intact, all circumcised penises look wrong. That is so true for me.
My nephews are circ'ed, and when I worked at a daycare, I think every boy in our class was circ'ed - it definitely seemed normal. The majority of men I have known were circ'ed as well, I never really thought about the procedure or reasons for it (other than it was expected for religious reasons if I had a son).
My son is intact and in my playgroup more than 50% of the boys are intact - such a pleasant surprise! Having seen my son's penis countless times during baths or diaper changes, it does look normal - that doesn't surprise me. What does surprise me is the shock I feel when I change the diaper of a friends baby who is circumcised, or my nephews diapers. It really surprises me every time.
I had so many comments from ignorant people about how ugly my son's penis would be if I left him intact and how 'icky' (nice clinical term) foreskins are. I wish all moms-to-be could see how normal an intact penis is, and how un-scary foreskins are.
That's another reason hospital circumcisions get done I'm sure - the babies are so new. If you had to wait a month or 6 weeks, I bet not nearly as many parents would bring their babies back into the hospital. It wouldn't seem necessary. The doctors are aware they have to mutilate them when they are brand new, or they'll more than likely lose their chance.
There's just so much ignorance and denial about this issue - it's so distressing. Seeing and hearing from more and more mamas who are leaving their babies intact is such a blessing!
Take care,
My nephews are circ'ed, and when I worked at a daycare, I think every boy in our class was circ'ed - it definitely seemed normal. The majority of men I have known were circ'ed as well, I never really thought about the procedure or reasons for it (other than it was expected for religious reasons if I had a son).
My son is intact and in my playgroup more than 50% of the boys are intact - such a pleasant surprise! Having seen my son's penis countless times during baths or diaper changes, it does look normal - that doesn't surprise me. What does surprise me is the shock I feel when I change the diaper of a friends baby who is circumcised, or my nephews diapers. It really surprises me every time.
I had so many comments from ignorant people about how ugly my son's penis would be if I left him intact and how 'icky' (nice clinical term) foreskins are. I wish all moms-to-be could see how normal an intact penis is, and how un-scary foreskins are.
That's another reason hospital circumcisions get done I'm sure - the babies are so new. If you had to wait a month or 6 weeks, I bet not nearly as many parents would bring their babies back into the hospital. It wouldn't seem necessary. The doctors are aware they have to mutilate them when they are brand new, or they'll more than likely lose their chance.
There's just so much ignorance and denial about this issue - it's so distressing. Seeing and hearing from more and more mamas who are leaving their babies intact is such a blessing!
Take care,








Andie, I couldn't agree more. My last resort circ argument is "at least wait until he's old enough for general anesthesia." I figure by that point (6 months?) it will be a non-issue because they'll be so used to the sight of their son's normal penis.
Also, we had not decided what we were going to do so I think I was afraid to look. My dh got the first diaper lesson (thanks to the nurses, I think they try hard to get dads to do that-
), my mom also whisked ds away whenever he needed a change, too.