Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › "Bottlefeeding Without Guilt"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Bottlefeeding Without Guilt" - Page 6  

post #101 of 111
Galatea, I'm not sure if you were responding to my post or just to the thread in general, but either way I thought maybe I would clarify my thoughts a little bit. I do think that guilt (and sadness, anger, etc.) can be a productive and healthy feeling. I think it can give impetus to change, and I think that's the purpose of guilt--to let us know when something's not quite right so we can make the necessary changes. I just think that guilt has to stem from within the person experiencing it. I think it's right to present facts or to teach truth, but it's a really fine line when we think we know enough about another person to know how they should feel about those facts/truth. One of the reasons I think "Bottlefeeding Without Guilt" is such an awful book is precisely because it tells women what they "shouldn't" feel. It messes with those normal and healthy feelings that our consciences give us--that inner feedback loop.

When I talk about the "should statements" being damaging, it's because the person is feeling something that they think they shouldn't be feeling, or because they aren't feeling something that they think they should be feeling. If a woman were feeling guilty for not bf'ing, whether the guilt was warranted or not, it is not helpful to keep focused on whether she should or shouldn't feel that way. It is helpful to acknowledge that she does feel that way and then determine how she can deal with those feelings and change things for the future. "Bottlefeeding Without Guilt" would take the position of telling her she "shouldn't" feel guilty in the first place, which would obviously negate a whole opportunity for change and growth through justifying a bad decision. On the other hand, if the woman is not feeling guilty in the first place, I'm not sure it does any good to try to make her feel that way. If anything, such attempts will drive her further away from making changes in the future. At the same time, I have heard a number of times in this thread and other threads that a woman who truly couldn't bf "shouldn't" feel guilty. But the fact is, she does. She has to start by accepting what she is feeling and then deciding how to work through it, and it often doesn't help to have people telling her that she shouldn't feel the way she does.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galatea
Guilt is an emotion that you feel on your own b/c you know deep inside you did something that you are not proud of.
Technically this is true. Even a woman who had legitimate reasons to stop bf'ing would most likely (especially if she values NFL/AP principles) not be proud of stopping, even if she knew it were the best decision for her situation. But I think it's important to note that guilt is not always so simple as "doing something bad/wrong=feeling guilty". Sometimes there are other complex issues going on below the surface that can bring on guilt, when even to outsiders it would appear that the guilt is not warranted--even when the person herself knows it is not warranted.

I don't think bf'ing advocates need to water down the facts in order to avoid people's guilt. Again, it just happens. It's really that person's issue to work through. And, I don't think advocates need to be vindictive either. Luckily, very few are.
post #102 of 111
This book looks to be atrocious, a real wallbanger. Is it well-written at least?

Wrt guilt: I agree with Galatea's sawhorse, but even as individual women give up guilt so to speak, we are still shamed for a lot of our choices, whatever they be.
post #103 of 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selu Gigage
This book looks to be atrocious, a real wallbanger. Is it well-written at least?
If you enjoy the ranting hyperbole Ezzo style of writing, it's great.
post #104 of 111
deleted because I was describing What to Expect!!!!

:LOL

oops
post #105 of 111
Hey, momtwice, having trouble keeping your threads straight? :LOL
post #106 of 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by annettemarie
If you enjoy the ranting hyperbole Ezzo style of writing, it's great.
Listen closely for the sound of book smacking wall. :Puke
post #107 of 111
I just had to bump up this thread again.

Today our basement flooded, and while dh and I were going through boxes of books and other junk, I happened upon my copy of "Bottlefeeding Without Guilt", which luckily was stuffed in a box that I hadn't opened for about five years. Of course, in light of this discussion, I couldn't resist spending the afternoon reading it. I haven't laughed that hard in a long time! I just had to share some of the choicest tidbits.

In one section, she's answering questions from bottle feeding moms. One mom wants to know how to get her older baby back on formula because she's introduced juice and now her child wants only juice. So, the author tells her to try mixing the formula with ice cream and then gradually cut down on the amount of ice cream until the baby is drinking only formula! She also says that the mom can try giving the baby potato chips or French Fries to make him thirsty so he will drink the formula! (I am not joking--the book actually gives this advice!)

The chapter on why the bf'ing movement is a cult is especially hysterical. She says that one of the characteristics of a cult is the presence of a charismatic leader that everyone looks up to--then she names "our leader" as Dr. Sears and our "bible" as "The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding". I just had to laugh, especially with all the discussion at mdc by people who actually don't think Dr. Sears best represents the AP movement (in this book's view, AP and "militant" bf'ing are the same). She says that another characteristic of cults is that the members must attend lots of meetings and can't have close associations with people who don't agree with them. So apparently we all have to go to LLL a few times a week and can't make any other friends. Then, she said that many "bf'ing militants" childlike-ness and lack of intellectual interest was evidenced in people choosing internet user-names that were things like "Billy's Mommy". I kid you not! First of all, I think the group of moms here at MDC and all those I know who practice attachment parenting are among some of the most questioning, searching, conscientious, intelligent, and intellectual moms I know. Second, the practice of having mommy-related usernames is certainly not restricted to bf'ers.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. I dare not post more because I don't want to get into copyright issues. Seriously, I think we should all read this just for the laughs. I just can't get over the fact that this book is attempting to be for real! It is so full of inflammatory language, labels ("cultist", "militant"), information taken out of context, etc. It is full of all the things she accuses bf'ing advocates of doing. It is simply unbelievable! Most of her quotations and citings from "real moms" are taken from internet discussions. You know how people get to venting here in Support and Advocacy, letting off steam over things that they would never actually say or do IRL? Well. she takes the most extreme comments of that type and uses them in her book to support her position that bf'ing advocates are so awful. Perfect example to me of taking quotes out of context.
post #108 of 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurel
You know how people get to venting here in Support and Advocacy, letting off steam over things that they would never actually say or do IRL? Well. she takes the most extreme comments of that type and uses them in her book to support her position that bf'ing advocates are so awful. Perfect example to me of taking quotes out of context.
Thanks for sharing Laurel! There's a huge part of me that just doesn't get how breastfeeding your child can be a controversial act, so it blows my mind to hear stuff like that. Glad you were able to get a chuckle out of it!

Okay, now I am getting OT, but I think your point is interesting about the author of the anti-bf book taking extreme comments made between what the speakers thought were like-minded people for something other than what they are. I think it is valuable for members of a group to have time/space to say things that they might not say to the general public in order to support one another. The challenge with doing it online is this really isn't a private space. Anyone can read what we say here.

Even among people in this forum who support bf I think misunderstandings happen sometimes when someone who is sick of seeing formula, fomula, formula everywhere says something like formula %&@#! And then someone who has to use it for medical reasons gets hurt feelings, when the person who made the original comment wasn't meaning to say anyone who ever uses formula is a horrible person.
post #109 of 111
Yeah, I agree that online posting is public posting. It's still infuriating to see an author take things and band them together to serve her own purpose when I can pretty much guarantee that in most of the cases it wasn't the way the poster intended it to be portrayed. There were a few quotes from mothers in awe over the beauty of their bond with their child and how sweet it was, and the author used these quotes to supposedly show how bf'ing "cultists" replace the spousal bond with the mother-child bond. In looking at the individual quotes objectively and critically, it was obvious that they were taken out of context. But it could look pretty convincing to a reader who wasn't paying careful attention.
post #110 of 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by tayndrewsmama
That is a very good point. Even if they can't change what they decided to do, they shouldn't be telling others false information.
But to these mothers, it may be THEIR truth. They may have been told by professionals they trusted that these things were true.

As a formula feeding culture, most people have never seen a baby nurse until they try to nurse their own. HOw could they know what was normal?

Also, these problems due happen, and happen more often than we advocates admit sometimes. Our society sets women up to fail, and then we rub salt in the wound instead of helping. I want to help women succed at nurising.

Remember, as a whole, we are taught that medical profession are all knowing. The avereage person has no idea how little bf info doctors and nurses have, and how standard birth practices affect the nursing relationship.

I refuse to call another mother who obviously loves her child and wants to do whats best something derogotory. If people were tellingyou that your baby was starving, you'd probably freak.

I foought hard to get my baby to nurse. I couldn't have succedded without the help of friends and family. I doubt that most mothers in my situation would have had the support to pump, nurse and finger feed around the clock. My best friend took 2 weeks off from work to help me. It took 3-4 adults to make it work.

I wouldn't have been able to do it if my partner hadnt been supportive, and if my friend hadn't been up all night with me every night so I would be quite so worn out.
post #111 of 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justice2
You know I think that the women that should feel guilty about bottlefeeding don't and the women that shouldn't do....My old downstairs neighbor said that she wouldn't nurse because she didn't want a kid hanging off her nipple all day long, and I really think that she should be ashamed of even having thoughts like that. Is that judgemental of me...yep. I (like so many other women here) WAS one of those moms on herbs and meds and pumping every hour and using an SNS and I felt ashamed and guilty cause (my case) it could have been prevented.
Exactly correct!!!


(good to see ya Justice and way to go ciggy-free!!!)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › "Bottlefeeding Without Guilt"