Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › to circumcise
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

to circumcise - Page 3  

post #41 of 43
Minky, I am sorry that you suffered abuse (I did also) it is very hard to get over.
I just wanted to say that an intact infant doesn't look the same as an adult. Maybe you can ease your way into looking at an intact infant, after you have discussed it with your therapist. Good luck on your healing journey.
post #42 of 43
I would strongly recommend against posting pictures of a child's genitals anywhere on the internet.

Back about a year ago, there was a circumcision fetish group that was searching out such pictures and were copying and posting them on their Yahoo site. Certainly, no parent would want that. Yahoo was notified and shut the site down instantly. Yahoo had that option and could take that action. That may not happen with a site that was not controlled by Yahoo or another similar provider.

You just never know how those photos may be used so just don't risk it!



Frank
post #43 of 43
Minky

I'm sorry you've had such a traumatic experience. I earnestly hope that you can overcome the abuse. I suffered a kind of sexually traumatic event myself as a child. I used to feel so much anger and despair over being violated. Then one day I just decided that it wasn't worth it. It's not worth my time anymore to be upset about it. What's done is done, it's long gone, and now I'm a powerful and mature adult with a lot to contribute to the world. I can think of a million things that are much more worthy of my time than stewing over a long-ago violation of my flesh.

When I got pregnant, DH and I (well, pretty much just me) researched circumcision and decided not to do it, even though DH is circ'ed. Our basic reasons were that it's not medically necessary, or even recommended, and that it would hurt our baby a lot. I never really thought about circumcision again until several months after DS was born. I started researching it more in depth, and came to the conclusion that unnecessary infant circumcision itself is downright sexually abusive. Here are my reasons for thinking this way.

The baby is strapped down to a board so he can't get away. That makes it restraint against the baby's will.

The baby's PENIS is cut on. That's one person forcing sexual touching on another person.

The baby's penis is CUT on. That makes it masochistic. The circumciser knows he/she is causing intense pain and damage to the penis, and willfully intends to cause intense pain and damage to the penis.

The baby's foreskin is permanently cut off. The foreskin has sexual feeling and sexual use. It is abusive to cut off sexual parts from a baby.

A baby trusts his parents to protect and nourish and teach him. Circumcising him is an abuse of his trust.

Pain relief is not often used during circumcision. If it is used, it is not often adequate to really relieve the pain. Sugar water is not a pain reliever, and you should run screaming away from anyone who says it is!

It is abusive to circumcise a baby on the grounds of the parents' sexual preferences. Parents' do not have the right to violate their children's genitals to make them look like 'more beautiful genitals' in their own opinion. Children are born with the bodies that they are meant to have.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › to circumcise