Did anyone read it?
They suggest on page 27 in the sidebar caring for your baby:
"If your son is not circumcised....
...the foreskin usually does not fully retract until abot age 5. Until then, retract the foreskin gently durig baths, only as far as it will go without forcing it.
most of the rest of the sidebar is OK... but some mom who reads that is going to retract it, I just know it UGH... why can't they say... JUST LEAVE IT ALONE!!!!!! rinse with clear water
The article in general was pro leaving your baby in tact, but had to mention a 2002 study finding circumcision linked to a reduced risk of penile HPV and a link of lower risk of crevical cancer in the current female partners of men with a history of multiple sexual partners.
Thankfully it also explains the procedure but not graphically enough to scare parents off.
When are we (as a society) going to learn to leave our bodies the way they were intended to be?
They suggest on page 27 in the sidebar caring for your baby:
"If your son is not circumcised....
...the foreskin usually does not fully retract until abot age 5. Until then, retract the foreskin gently durig baths, only as far as it will go without forcing it.

most of the rest of the sidebar is OK... but some mom who reads that is going to retract it, I just know it UGH... why can't they say... JUST LEAVE IT ALONE!!!!!! rinse with clear water
The article in general was pro leaving your baby in tact, but had to mention a 2002 study finding circumcision linked to a reduced risk of penile HPV and a link of lower risk of crevical cancer in the current female partners of men with a history of multiple sexual partners.
Thankfully it also explains the procedure but not graphically enough to scare parents off.
When are we (as a society) going to learn to leave our bodies the way they were intended to be?












