Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Restoration question.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Restoration question.  

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
My husband and I were watching a documentary on the 'perfect penis' and there was a guy who showed off his restoration - it looked fantastic, just like he'd never been circumcised. But he didn't pull his foreskin back, so I've been left wondering. Uncut guys have a much glossier, softer head - cut guys seem to look 'dry' and rough ... but after a restoration, what does the head look like? Does it stay the same as it was before restoration, since he was keratinised for so long, or does it revert back, since it's being protected?

Thanks for any insight
post #2 of 9
It mostly reverts back. Some of the wrinkles in the glans go away and the skin texture becomes more glossy about the same as intact. A lot of the keritinized skin is sloughed off so that the color becomes much pinker and the grayish cast goes away.

Restoration goes a long way toward putting the penis back to a normal appearance but it comes up a good bit short of the original functionality.



Frank
post #3 of 9
Where did you see this documentary? I would be interested.
post #4 of 9
I had been wondering about that myself.

sounds like a fascinating documentary
post #5 of 9
Thread Starter 
.
post #6 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by caloli
Anyway, it was a Canadian doco called 'In search of the perfect penis'.
They didn't call me! Was this for Canadians only???? : : :



Frank
post #7 of 9
If anyone finds it on a US channel, please post. I'd be interested to see it too.
post #8 of 9
Thread Starter 
.
post #9 of 9
I'd be interested in finding a copy of this. Sounds fascinating!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Restoration question.