Originally Posted by Minky
What I meant about the picutures was they could fall into a real sicko's hands esp. if they get on the internet.
Theres nothing wrong with nudity. I don't think people should be sicked out by seeing a little boy or little girl running in the yard naked, playing in the sprinkler. I think that sort of thing would raise awareness about there being many uncut little guys out there.
I have "naked baby in the bath" and naked delivery room pics. I even have a few of dd where she has stripped her clothes off and is running round the house with her blanky on like a cape. I would never put those on the net but yes when family and friends come over dd will point out the "bare bottom" pic if we are sharing baby photos.
I am a bit paranoid about all the real sickos out there who get off on looking at little kids' parts which is why I would think a pic focusing on a child's genetalia would be rejected by the photo store and authorities notified. Nothing I've ever taken of my dd focuses on her private parts even if they happen to be in the picture.
Anyhow, just my two cents.
~Nay “The Intactavist Doula” : my little booby bandito, Antonin
I love my super supportive DH Our kitties!