re: ultrasounds
Well, you asked, so here's my take on u/s!
I found out the ultrasound info by doing a search on the web. It was so long ago, I don't have the links, but you should be able to find the info fairly easily. Just take a careful look at your sources. I try to avoid the scare tactic propaganda.
The major deciding factor for me is that ACOG does not recommend a routine ultrasound. A major study showed that routine us in low risk pregnancies does not improve birth outcomes. In fact, they tended to correspond with higher induction rates, c-sections, and premature births due to doctors' actions when they think they see something wrong on the u/s. ACOG based its decision mainly on cost factors, though. They didn't see routine u/s as being worth the cost, since it didn't improve outcomes. I've heard that in some parts of the country, insurance companies won't pay for routine u/s because of this.
Another factor was something I read saying that the u/s sound waves are about the decibel level of a freight train to the fetus. I wouldn't want that next to my ear.
As for finding out that "everything is okay," I tried to think of the flip side of that. U/s technology is tricky. A lot of it depends on the expertise of the tech, which is a big variable. I've read the u/s board on a mainstream bb and it's full of worried women wondering what some little shadow on an u/s meant. I think the worry and stress caused by a false negative can seriously impact a birth experience, even beyond the unnecessary/early inductions and c-sections. Since I knew I wouldn't abort if there was a problem; and, that problems caught at birth have about the same outcome as problems caught
during pg I decided to forgo the routine u/s.
As for "dangers" of u/s, there isn't any hard evidence, mostly because the studies haven't been done. It's one more technology that has been introduced... and then "improved"... without really being proven safe and effective. My dr. said it was safe just because it had been used for 20 years without any obvious negative outcomes. But, there are theories that it may contribute to more subtle problems (like ADD, but then everything under the sun has been blamed for ADD!). Some of these theories sound a little far-fetched to me, frankly, and the science seems weak.
But, some women have them so often... without suspicion of something being wrong! Some drs use them at every prenatal appointment! I think newer and more powerful technology is being used way too much, at earlier and earlier dates when the fetus is still developing, and who knows how that affects things? U/s may have been in use for 20 years, but is it still being used the same way? Is it really even still the same technology? I think we won't truly know if there are any problems with overuse until much further down the road.
I did have a 41.5 week u/s to check amniotic fluid with ds. I figured anything that helped avoid an induction discussion was good! I think they're a useful technology, but way overused. I will be willing to have one if there is some indication during the pg that it might be needed, but only on a case-specific scenario.
Wow, I didn't realize I was going to write a whole book! This is one of my "pet" topics, lol!
Honeybee