My son was born in 2003 and vaxed on schedule. After I learned more and wished I hadn't done that to him, I went over his vax records. According to what the drug companies report (like on Table 1 in this page:
http://www.fda.gov/cber/vaccine/thimerosal.htm )
, I didn't think he got any thimerosal except for what was in the flu shot.
This morning another mom told me that her physician (a non-vaxing Dr.) said that since thimerosal in vaccines was never banned, and eliminating it from routine ped vaxs was voluntary, and that the govt has supposedly "proven" that it "never caused any harm", that some drug companies have put it back in, and are not reporting this to the FDA or on the inserts, because they really don't have to. So it's possible to get a vax thinking that it is free of thimerosal, with a package insert that says it is thimerosal free, when it's not. She said they would not be caught unless someone tested the vaccines for it, and that even if they were penalized for having the wrong information on the insert, it wouldn't be much of a penalty because it is a preservative that is considered "safe".
Has anyone heard of this - is it true that they can claim a vaccine has little to no thimerosal when they know it does ? I know they don't have to make vaccines without it, but I didn't think they could put false info on the package inserts for the lots...
Now I am feeling so paranoid !
Thanks,
Linda B
http://www.fda.gov/cber/vaccine/thimerosal.htm )
, I didn't think he got any thimerosal except for what was in the flu shot.
This morning another mom told me that her physician (a non-vaxing Dr.) said that since thimerosal in vaccines was never banned, and eliminating it from routine ped vaxs was voluntary, and that the govt has supposedly "proven" that it "never caused any harm", that some drug companies have put it back in, and are not reporting this to the FDA or on the inserts, because they really don't have to. So it's possible to get a vax thinking that it is free of thimerosal, with a package insert that says it is thimerosal free, when it's not. She said they would not be caught unless someone tested the vaccines for it, and that even if they were penalized for having the wrong information on the insert, it wouldn't be much of a penalty because it is a preservative that is considered "safe".
Has anyone heard of this - is it true that they can claim a vaccine has little to no thimerosal when they know it does ? I know they don't have to make vaccines without it, but I didn't think they could put false info on the package inserts for the lots...
Now I am feeling so paranoid !
Thanks,
Linda B







Follow Mothering