Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Frankly Speaking
The problem is that the average circumcised guy hears "extra sensitivity" but what registers in his brain is "premature ejaculation" and his response is predictably "I'm already almost too sensitive, I don't want it to be any more sensitive."
They don't have the parts to provide the other type of sensitivity so they can't imagine it. Imagine a man who has perfect 20/20 vision or better except that he's totally color blind. If you tell him that there is a process that will give him more visual sensitivity, he's not going to really understand what you're saying. He has no more concept of what red, blue or green is than a circumcised man has a concept of what a complete sexual experience is. Neither has the receptors to understand it.
|
My vote is for denial rather than an inability to grasp the concept. I luckily have got better than 20/20 vision, but while not totally color blind, I do have some color-blindedness. If I was told that someone went out of
MY way and, to keep it simple, circumcised just my eyes (let alone my penis), I'd be pissed!!
And since it's so convenient, I'll bring my idiot brother in the mix again. Frank, maybe our brothers are the same person since mine gave me the exact same argument that yours did. Mine agreed when I asked if more of a good thing is better. He agreed when I said that premature ejaculation can affect anyone - circumcised or not. Not to get too tawdry, but he also agreed when I said that it takes time to develop one's control and stamina. Yet, too much sensation - BAD. Ugh! I like to consider him the black sheep of the family, but since there's only the two of us, maybe I'm the black sheep.
)
