Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › For those of you who asked
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

For those of you who asked - Page 2  

post #21 of 27

Re: Bears

Well regarding the spray, if I were in an area where there was likely to be bears, I would have glasses on, sun or clear and some on any dc to prevent the spray from going in the eyes. And as for dogs, I'd be shelling out the money to buy 2 professionally trained Karelian Bear Dogs and I'd have them go with me all over.
post #22 of 27
Quote:
To be at the mercy of a government or FEMA wouldn't be my place of choice.
MT you are dead right, look at this list of FEMA Blocking efforts. You are on your own:

FEMA won't accept Amtrak's help in evacuations
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/84aa35cc-1da8-11da-b40b-00000e..

FEMA turns away experienced firefighters
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/5/105538/7048

FEMA turns back Wal-Mart supply trucks
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/national/nationalspec..

FEMA prevents Coast Guard from delivering diesel fuel
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/national/nationalspec..

FEMA won't let Red Cross deliver food
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05246/565143.stm

FEMA bars morticians from entering New Orleans
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15147862&BRD=...

FEMA blocks 500-boat citizen flotilla from delivering aid
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/3/171718/0826

FEMA fails to utilize Navy ship with 600-bed hospital on board
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0509..

FEMA to Chicago: Send just one truck
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-050902dale..

FEMA turns away generators
http://www.wwltv.com/local/stories/WWLBLOG.ac3fcea.html

FEMA: "First Responders Urged Not To Respond"
http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=18470

That last one is real -- not satire but straight from FEMA's website.
post #23 of 27
Here's another doozy:

Frustrated: Fire crews to hand out fliers for FEMA
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

Quote:
Many of the firefighters, assembled from Utah and throughout the United States by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, thought they were going to be deployed as emergency workers. Instead, they have learned they are going to be community-relations officers for FEMA, shuffled throughout the Gulf Coast region to disseminate fliers and a phone number: 1-800-621-FEMA.
and:

Quote:
"They've got people here who are search-and-rescue certified, paramedics, haz-mat certified," said a Texas firefighter. "We're sitting in here having a sexual-harassment class while there are still [victims] in Louisiana who haven't been contacted yet."
post #24 of 27
Yesterday's paper had this quote from Sen. Lieberman (Conn.)

"We need to rebuild the confidence of the American people...in our government's ability to protect them from attack, whether it comes from nature or from terrorists."

When the government itself encourages its people to have a blind faith that agencies will take care of them, it makes threads like the deleted one all the more important to have out there.
post #25 of 27
Thread Starter 
Joan, I know you're not dissing me for removing the thread, and, I agree that the thread I requested be permanently removed, was important.

Given the effort and information it takes to do one of these thread, I'll only do the next one when I "know" I feel safe here. And that's up to the board to let me know that.

I'm preparing a biothread already, not neceesarily to use here anyway... but because I like to regularly go through these issues myself, and it forms the basis for a family manual. But I'm not going to attempt to put it up yet because.... because I KNOW there are going to be people who will feel personally threatened by the thread. I know I did, the first time I took part in one elsewhere, and the reason I felt threatened was because my own previous lack of vision and thought was being exposed.

If the other thread provocated that level of rejoinder, talking about even more important and threatening issues, requires a level of control and calm that is much greater than "think on this" did. Responses must not be instant, and must be thought through carefully. I'm at an advantage, if I'm the only one here that's done this before. I may not be. I don't know. But I do know that biothreads can get people very emotional.

Your not talking about two hours of "apocalypse now" and then going home to normality.

You're talking about taking yourself and people right out of a comfort zone.

We're not talking about Jeff, and "survivor" where at any moment a helicopter can whisk you out of there.

You're talking about live and death at a much closer and more dangerous level. So people who read it, will have to be prepared to suck up emotions and think through their responses before they hit submit. People have to realise that to put these things out there makes the "putter" in as fragile a position as the "reader".

In a biothread, where inevitably there isn't much a government can do to help on a really meaningful level, and sometimtes what they do do, can threaten your existence, suggestions will include a lot of sensitive ideas, not just some of what was said before, but also medical supplies, nursing methods, reality of isolation, thinking laterally, information for which "scientific" proof is lacking. It might include detailed descriptions of methods to do things, key things to think about, remedy recipes, nursing methods, supplies you need to consider; the very stuff some people would consider medical advice, which it isn't.

and it will challenge you to the ends of your hair.

The question is, are you prepared to take on that challenge and meet it with calm and maturity and not shoot the messenger in the process?



It's what you do when your back is to the wall, and no-one else either has answers or gives a damn, because they're running scared.

the question is, is this board ready, and does it have the maturity to discuss these issues without losing the plot along the way?

You have to keep a balance between realising that this could be for real, but also treating it as a technical exercise.

Remember that CDC does do this, as is FEMA supposed to. But I have no faith in centralised solutions especially where the people thinking through the solutions may go outside their brief for the very reason that they themselves will be personally threatened by the very thing they are supposed to be fighting.

Therefore in bio issues, even more than other issues, the individual needs to do the hard yards, and get on board with a close knit group of equally committed people, realising that you never know what each other is really made of, until the H really hits the fan, and you're facing the issue front on...

In these situations, total confidence in Government to SY butt, is misplaced, for the simple reason that there is 269? million of you, and how many of them? Further more, in a really dangerous situation which may be far more widespread than a hurricane, much of the population elsewhere can also develop a siege mentality.
post #26 of 27
I would love to have a biothread. Living in metro DC, I believe we are much more at risk of a terrorist threat (bio, dirty nuke, attack on chemical plant, etc.) than we are at risk of natural hazards. (Well, unless that island in the Azores drops into the sea and sends the biggest tsunami ever washing over us, but I don't think there's much point in preparing for that!)

Anyway, I really, really, really want a biothread. Please?
post #27 of 27
Thread Starter 
Let me start another thread, and ask another question first, okay?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › For those of you who asked