**Xposted to Vax forum**
Ok, I did a little search and found a great thread on here which linked Vit K to childhood lukemia/cancer. I have decided that I don't want the Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it. However, at my MW appointment today (using a BC) I got a lot of pressure from the MW and the RN about getting the Vit K. I was also told that they would not clip the babies tongue (if the baby is tongue tied) if I didn't do the shot. They also said they couldn't use the oral Vit K. I read in an article that the oral hasn't been approved by the FDA so maybe that is why they won't use it?
They are really cool about no eye drops, waiting on the PKU and no Hep B, but they are putting a lot of pressure on the Vit K. The MW mentioned that a few years ago they didn't give the Vit K to a baby and it ended up with a brain bleed, that is why they are so insistant. To me that is a pour excuse and I really wanted to roll my eyes. This is also the first time I had met this particular MW and she rubbed me the wrong way, but I think how insistant she was on the Vit K is what bothered me. However, at my first appointment that MW was also pretty persistant about the Vit K, though it was so early in the pregnancy that we didn't really get into it.
Anyways, I am a little torn as to what to do. I still won't give the baby Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it (ie a tramatic birth, bruising, etc.) but if I want the babies tongue clipped (which I do if it is tongue tied) then I would have to agree to the Vit K because the baby could hemorage.
SO I guess I am wondering how others here feel about the Vit K and what situation THEY feel would warrant the shot. Would you get it to get the babies tongue clipped so that nursing can be successful from the get go? Would you get it if you had a 48 hour labor, with 3 hours of hard labor? Would you get it if the MW felt is was necissary?Ok, I did a little search and found a great thread on here which linked Vit K to childhood lukemia/cancer. I have decided that I don't want the Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it. However, at my MW appointment today (using a BC) I got a lot of pressure from the MW and the RN about getting the Vit K. I was also told that they would not clip the babies tongue (if the baby is tongue tied) if I didn't do the shot. They also said they couldn't use the oral Vit K. I read in an article that the oral hasn't been approved by the FDA so maybe that is why they won't use it?
They are really cool about no eye drops, waiting on the PKU and no Hep B, but they are putting a lot of pressure on the Vit K. The MW mentioned that a few years ago they didn't give the Vit K to a baby and it ended up with a brain bleed, that is why they are so insistant. To me that is a pour excuse and I really wanted to roll my eyes. This is also the first time I had met this particular MW and she rubbed me the wrong way, but I think how insistant she was on the Vit K is what bothered me. However, at my first appointment that MW was also pretty persistant about the Vit K, though it was so early in the pregnancy that we didn't really get into it.
Anyways, I am a little torn as to what to do. I still won't give the baby Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it (ie a tramatic birth, bruising, etc.) but if I want the babies tongue clipped (which I do if it is tongue tied) then I would have to agree to the Vit K because the baby could hemorage.
SO I guess I am wondering how others here feel about the Vit K and what situation THEY feel would warrant the shot. Would you get it to get the babies tongue clipped so that nursing can be successful from the get go? Would you get it if you had a 48 hour labor, with 3 hours of hard labor? Would you get it if the MW felt is was necissary?
Ok, I did a little search and found a great thread on here which linked Vit K to childhood lukemia/cancer. I have decided that I don't want the Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it. However, at my MW appointment today (using a BC) I got a lot of pressure from the MW and the RN about getting the Vit K. I was also told that they would not clip the babies tongue (if the baby is tongue tied) if I didn't do the shot. They also said they couldn't use the oral Vit K. I read in an article that the oral hasn't been approved by the FDA so maybe that is why they won't use it?
They are really cool about no eye drops, waiting on the PKU and no Hep B, but they are putting a lot of pressure on the Vit K. The MW mentioned that a few years ago they didn't give the Vit K to a baby and it ended up with a brain bleed, that is why they are so insistant. To me that is a pour excuse and I really wanted to roll my eyes. This is also the first time I had met this particular MW and she rubbed me the wrong way, but I think how insistant she was on the Vit K is what bothered me. However, at my first appointment that MW was also pretty persistant about the Vit K, though it was so early in the pregnancy that we didn't really get into it.
Anyways, I am a little torn as to what to do. I still won't give the baby Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it (ie a tramatic birth, bruising, etc.) but if I want the babies tongue clipped (which I do if it is tongue tied) then I would have to agree to the Vit K because the baby could hemorage.

SO I guess I am wondering how others here feel about the Vit K and what situation THEY feel would warrant the shot. Would you get it to get the babies tongue clipped so that nursing can be successful from the get go? Would you get it if you had a 48 hour labor, with 3 hours of hard labor? Would you get it if the MW felt is was necissary?Ok, I did a little search and found a great thread on here which linked Vit K to childhood lukemia/cancer. I have decided that I don't want the Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it. However, at my MW appointment today (using a BC) I got a lot of pressure from the MW and the RN about getting the Vit K. I was also told that they would not clip the babies tongue (if the baby is tongue tied) if I didn't do the shot. They also said they couldn't use the oral Vit K. I read in an article that the oral hasn't been approved by the FDA so maybe that is why they won't use it?
They are really cool about no eye drops, waiting on the PKU and no Hep B, but they are putting a lot of pressure on the Vit K. The MW mentioned that a few years ago they didn't give the Vit K to a baby and it ended up with a brain bleed, that is why they are so insistant. To me that is a pour excuse and I really wanted to roll my eyes. This is also the first time I had met this particular MW and she rubbed me the wrong way, but I think how insistant she was on the Vit K is what bothered me. However, at my first appointment that MW was also pretty persistant about the Vit K, though it was so early in the pregnancy that we didn't really get into it.
Anyways, I am a little torn as to what to do. I still won't give the baby Vit K unless there is an actual medical reason for it (ie a tramatic birth, bruising, etc.) but if I want the babies tongue clipped (which I do if it is tongue tied) then I would have to agree to the Vit K because the baby could hemorage.

SO I guess I am wondering how others here feel about the Vit K and what situation THEY feel would warrant the shot. Would you get it to get the babies tongue clipped so that nursing can be successful from the get go? Would you get it if you had a 48 hour labor, with 3 hours of hard labor? Would you get it if the MW felt is was necissary?










