I have decided that I want to wait until the cord stops pulsating before it is clamped. I am delivering at a hospital with a traditional OB (well, one of four that is on call). When I brought it up to one of the OB's, she said that she doesn't believe all the benefits of it but it definitely doesn't hurt (that's fine, as long as she does it) but asked if I wanted to baby put on my abdomen after it was born or for the greatest benefit it should be held down, below the placenta. I guess I had never thought of it. I really want the baby on my belly right away. Then I talked to one of the other OB's and she said that she would be concerned (this is my least favourite OB in the practice) about not clamping the cord right away with the baby on my belly because of gravity and it could pull some of the blood and nutrients away from the baby. Is there any validity in this? For those of you who waited to clamp the cord, did you have the baby put on your chest right away or did they hold the baby below the placenta and which would you suggest? Assuming I have a full-term healthy baby, I'm not so big on the benefits of delayed cord clamping, I really want the baby on me right away, and figure that even a little benefit is better than none, even if having it above the placenta takes away some of the benefit.
Anyway, any input would be appreciated.
Anyway, any input would be appreciated.







Follow Mothering