New Posts  All Forums:
 

Bratz Dolls? - Page 5

post #81 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnschoolnMa
What bothers me far more than what a doll might or might not be wearing is teaching kids to call people names/assume bad things based on their attire.
Good point, Unschool.
post #82 of 149
The good news is that the OP got her answer. This is a controversial issue toy that shouldn't just be generically given as a present to someone else's child.
post #83 of 149
[QUOTE\]BTW, I CANNOT believe they have thong panties at the Limited Too. What in the hell is the matter with a little girl having panty lines? And what little girl wants to wear a thong panty? Disgusting![/QUOTE]


i have a friend who's daughter has them, apparently the DOLLS have thongs!!
post #84 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsMoe
Apparently you didn't see these Bratz dolls, so I will repost the link:
Two of the four are showing their midriffs and the third is wearing a skirt so short that if she were a real person, you'd see her underwear.

Namaste!
post #85 of 149
My daughter, who has a TV, computer, Game Cube and Ipod in her room has Bratz. Did you think it was possible to go that wrong in one sentence ? She never did Barbie and in fact rarely played with dolls at all. She has always been more of a build and crash it down girl. Two years ago, she got curious about them when her friends got into them. I let her get some because she asked and was at the time 10. For reference, they do not dress like the hookers in our hood. Yes, we really have them and drug dealers and gang bangers to boot. Hookers, where we live, tend to dress pretty normal. DD thinks they are very weird and not something she would aspire to be. And yes, I told her she woouldn't get past the front, back or side door dressed like that. We talked fairly openly about the message that sends to people when they see you looking like that. When her friends were over and did all played with the Bratz, it was pretty harmless. Let's go shopping, to the park, movies type stuff. Now, they sit in a box, unused. She does not hang out with those friends either, which is partly sad since they were all such good friends. They spend too much time talking about hair, nails, boys and gossip- according to dd. I think that had I made it a big issue and not let her have the stupid things in the house, it would have made her very resentful. And no I am not afraid of making my kid angry over issues that matter. This was just not a battle I felt needed to happen. I had to trust her enough to see the doll for what it was. She did. I guess the bottom line is, as parents we make judgement calls for our kids and what we are confortable letting them have. We are the ones that have to live them and so it should be ok if the parent says so (barring cases of abuse, neglect, ect). I know I would hate if someone said I was a bad mom for letting dd or ds do ???, even though I carefully thought it through. We are all, for the most part, trying to do the best we can doing the hardest job in the world- raising healthy, balanced children.


~Peace
post #86 of 149
I have been thinking about this some more and thinking about my daughter, who is almost 4. She currently loves the Magic Treehouse books about Jack and Annie. She has seen in the books that Annie wears pigtails, so she has told me many times to do her hair in pigtails so that she can "look like Annie." Why is it so much of a leap to think that my daughter would also want to dress like Annie? (In reality, she does, because Annie most often wears jeans and t-shirts.) In fact, when Annie travels through time, she wears clothes characteristic of the time period she is in, and my daughter gets out her play silks and and dress-up clothes and dresses up like Annie in China, Annie in the Arctic, Annie in Shakespeare's England. Why isn't it reasonable to think that a little girl who plays with Bratz would want to look like a Brat?

If I lived in a society where we all ran around in public naked, I'd be cool with my kid running around in public naked. But we live in a society that has sexualized breasts, midriffs, panties, short skirts, etc. While I don't particularly mind those styles (and indeed, my kids often play with their friends wearing just underwear), when I am out in public and around people I don't know and trust, I am not going to give them ANY chance to sexualize my daughter FOR ANY REASON.

When my daughter is old enough to make the decisions on how she dresses based on ALL the information, well, I'll step aside. But until then, I am not going to let my daughter be a tool of societal forces beyond her control and understanding.

Namaste!
post #87 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by dharmamama
I have been thinking about this some more and thinking about my daughter, who is almost 4. She currently loves the Magic Treehouse books about Jack and Annie. She has seen in the books that Annie wears pigtails, so she has told me many times to do her hair in pigtails so that she can "look like Annie." Why is it so much of a leap to think that my daughter would also want to dress like Annie? (In reality, she does, because Annie most often wears jeans and t-shirts.) In fact, when Annie travels through time, she wears clothes characteristic of the time period she is in, and my daughter gets out her play silks and and dress-up clothes and dresses up like Annie in China, Annie in the Arctic, Annie in Shakespeare's England. Why isn't it reasonable to think that a little girl who plays with Bratz would want to look like a Brat?
I agree wholeheartedly.
post #88 of 149
I think all of those dolls in the links look over sexualizd. It is about more than how much skin is showing. it is about how tight the clothes are how they are cut what kind of makeup they are wearing, what expressions are in thier eys and on thier lips. It all sends a very clear messege. And I have no doubt that kids are equating those clothes with cool and wanting thowse clothes. It is about more than sex too. It is a whole unattractive attitude and the lifestyle thier accessories promote also go against our values. And there are lots of toys etc we won't give our children acess to. I doubt they even think twice about havnig one more toy. I prefer to protect thier innocence. nurture creative play. promote sweetness, respectful speech and kindness over bratty behavior. we value modesty in dress, movement and in our attitudes (flashy and boastful and possesion driven isn't our thing). we also value meaningful work over things like shopping and lazing about in lodges or cruising in fancy cars. So nothing about these dolls work with out family. \

. . . not to mention how long do you think it would be before we lost thier feet . . . .

If anyone is looking for a good alternative to this sort of thing that is both curte and affordable. I highly recomment the 8 inch Madeline dolls. The old ones are beter but the new ones are still better than anything else offered. They are comprable to brats in price and head size . and have fun accessories that aren't centered around high fashion, shopping or lazing about and there is nothing sexual about them
post #89 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyka
It is about more than sex too. It is a whole unattractive attitude and the lifestyle thier accessories promote also go against our values.
:

Namaste!
post #90 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by dharmamama
I have been thinking about this some more and thinking about my daughter, who is almost 4. She currently loves the Magic Treehouse books about Jack and Annie. She has seen in the books that Annie wears pigtails, so she has told me many times to do her hair in pigtails so that she can "look like Annie." Why is it so much of a leap to think that my daughter would also want to dress like Annie? (In reality, she does, because Annie most often wears jeans and t-shirts.) In fact, when Annie travels through time, she wears clothes characteristic of the time period she is in, and my daughter gets out her play silks and and dress-up clothes and dresses up like Annie in China, Annie in the Arctic, Annie in Shakespeare's England. Why isn't it reasonable to think that a little girl who plays with Bratz would want to look like a Brat?
I wanted to stay out of this, but needed to reply to this.

It's not unreasonable, but you have to take it on a child by child basis. My child does not, in fact, like to copy anyone, she doesn't ask or even want to dress the way anyone else does, or have her hair done how someone else's is. She's not easily impressionable at all by things like that.

One child can take a 'doll' much differently than another. I don't think it's fair at all to push your own stereotypes and thoughts (this is directed to the general 'you', not anyone in particular), on ANY other family or ANYONE else's child. You don't know them, you DON'T know the child and you CANNOT compare how your child would act/react to how another's child would/will.

Do what you want in your own home for your own family, but don't go pushing others to be just like you.
post #91 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by MomBirthmomStepmom
Do what you want in your own home for your own family, but don't go pushing others to be just like you.
I think that's the point of this thread, that these sorts of things shouldn't be pushed onto kids as a gift if you don't know if they're okay with the parents.
post #92 of 149
Quote:
Nothing is ever *just* a doll.
ITA.

I dislike Bratz very strongly and do not want them to ever have a place in my home.

I have bought a (relatively modestly dressed one) one on clearance to strip and steal the clothing from (so I can give it to my Blythe) , and FWIW, their waists are smaller than Barbie's. Way smaller.

For a fairly easily obtainable, good alternative, look into the Only Hearts Club dolls
post #93 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by MomBirthmomStepmom
One child can take a 'doll' much differently than another. I don't think it's fair at all to push your own stereotypes and thoughts (this is directed to the general 'you', not anyone in particular), on ANY other family or ANYONE else's child. You don't know them, you DON'T know the child and you CANNOT compare how your child would act/react to how another's child would/will.
I wasn't using my daughter as the final arbiter on what all little girls will or won't do, but I also don't believe that my daughter is the ONLY little girl in the world who would be influenced by a doll.

Why do these types of threads always turn into as "If your opinion is different than mine, then you are trying to make decisions for me and my family"?

I think Bratz dolls look like sluts, but frankly, I don't really care whether anyone else buys them for their kids. It's fun to talk about online but is another example of a subject that isn't all that important in real life.

Why can't we just recognize that we can all state our opinion and it's just our opinion, not our intent to try to rule what others do?

Namaste!
post #94 of 149
I just wanted to say that while i would not at the time buy one for my 2 year old dd, and wouldnt plan on introducing something like this to my dd on purpose at any time during her childhood, my friends dd who is 10 has them. Apparently she just loves them and this little girl is a really great kid. She does not dress like that or wear makeup, she is good in school, studies ballet and is a well rounded, good, happy kid. My friend knows her daughter and that it was something that wouldnt be taken out of context. I do think that for some kids, it is just a doll. I dont think they are great, and I wouldnt buy one as a gift or for my own dd, and Im really disgusted that the dolls wear thongs................

but I just dont think I need to judge my friend or her daughter because she allows her to play with them.
post #95 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by dharmamama

Even the "cute" Bratz dolls someone listed are showing their midriffs.
Well, the difference for some people is that they don't think there is a single thing wrong with showing your belly, and so a doll who is showing her's isn't a problem. My family doesn't think that the stomach must be hidden around other people any more than the elbows or ears must be. My daughter wears cropped shirts often. As far as I know she is not a "ho". lol
post #96 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnschoolnMa
Well, the difference for some people is that they don't think there is a single thing wrong with showing your belly, and so a doll who is showing her's isn't a problem.
Ummm, yes, I know that. But it's a problem for me. The midriff thing is part of the reason I wouldn't buy a Bratz for my kid.

Like I said in my last post, why can't we state our opinions with the understanding that they are merely our opinions, not a mandate on what the rest of the world must do?

When you say, "I have no problem with the dolls, and my daughter owns several," I don't take that as "You should buy them for your daughter too," so why does "I wouldn't buy them because they are dressed inappropriately" mean, "You shouldn't buy them for your daughter?"

Namaste!
post #97 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by dharmamama
Why do these types of threads always turn into as "If your opinion is different than mine, then you are trying to make decisions for me and my family"?
Cause that's what it sounds like some people want to do, or are trying to do.

I can't believe people are using the terms 'sluts' and 'whores' and 'hookers' and 'streetwalkers' here... THAT is more disgusting than any doll, IMO. Seriously, we're adults, but some people on this thread are saying things that sound alot like they're coming out of the mouth of a brainless doll instead...
post #98 of 149
dharmamama : :
post #99 of 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by MomBirthmomStepmom
Cause that's what it sounds like some people want to do, or are trying to do.
You honestly believe that people who post on this thread are actually trying to make decisions for your family?

Namaste!
post #100 of 149
I'm not afraid of my Dd learning about women's sexuality. It's a process beginning from birth, but I do find the Bratz doll to be the wrong first impression of sexuality, and a rather strong one at that. The Bratz dolls are so extremely made up, so extremely dressed up, so extreme in their features and their figures that I think it creates a strong impression.

It's like if I - a 38 year old - go to the library and read Cosmo, People, Vogue, etc., it can be rather deflating, particularly if I then go to a movie see similar images there. As an adult, there's this inner dialogue that goes on telling me that I'm fine the way I am, that leg hair is actually normal and sexy on a woman.

Well, children are learning and navigating these issues, too, and I just hope that they are able to have a broader idea of sexuality than the mainstream American view portrayed by these dolls.

When I was loading up Bratzpack.com, I received a message "Please, wait. It takes a long time to look this good." Yeah, I used to believe that and maybe part of me still does. I hope all of your kids really are more mature and balanced on this issue than I am, but when I taught Psychology of Women and Women's Studies 101, I certainly got the idea that the younger generation struggles with this issue just as much as mine.