Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Struggling to understand more re:disc~autism and terms
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Struggling to understand more re:disc~autism and terms  

post #1 of 25
Thread Starter 
http://www.mothering.com/discussions...=1#post4337455

The above thread brought up a lot of questions for me and I thought while I learned it would be nice to share. I'd like to try to keep this somewhat organized, but I doubt it will work that way. What I'll do if others are interested is try to compile all the links and definitions in some reply posts once everyone has chimed in. Then I'll try to keep each reply limited to one area with the title as a pointer so it can be used as a refrence in the future. Of course I'm probably and this will go nowhere but it will be fun trying! If it is ok, I'll try to quote other posters under whatever reply the relevant topic has information compliled so people can just find it all in one spot(? If that makes sense)

or...I think I'll cut and paste one article at a time and try to break it down. I am finding all the pieces slowly, but when I go to put them together I forget what the picture on the front of the box looked like!


***edited to add: I just spent a few hours trying to understand most of the stuff in the first article. Things are not boding well for me. I did get the basic gist of it when MT posted it...I should have left it at that instead of trying to really get it
post #2 of 25
Thread Starter 

epigenetics

This term is used a lot in discussions, but I don't quite understand the definition in wikepedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetic

It gives two main definitions:
Quote:
he study of heritable changes in gene function that occur without a change in the sequence of nuclear DNA. This includes the study of how environmental factors affecting a parent can result in changes in the way genes are expressed in the offspring (see Waterland citation).
and
Quote:
* The study of the processes involved in the unfolding development of an organism. This includes phenomena such as X chromosome inactivation in mammalian females, and gene silencing within an organism.
To me in My Version Of English the first one is saying: Epigenetics is studying changes in gene functions that don't happen by changing the DNA. I guess this means the gene is the same but performs differently?

and the second: Epigenetics is studying how an organism develops and changes. It seems really broad to me, I must be missing something.

or http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/genome/.../hg02b002.html
Quote:
DNA does not exist as naked molecules in the cell: it is associated with proteins called histones to form a complex substance known as chromatin.

Chemical modifications to the DNA or the histones alter the structure of the chromatin without changing the nucleotide sequence of the DNA. Such modifications are described as epigenetic.
So, it would be why autism is not genetically handed down because it affects the structure but the dna is the same. So because chromatin basically packages the dna, affecting it affects the way the genes behave but does not alter the gene structure itself? When the vaccines are given they affect the immune system all the way to the chromatin giving the semblance of being gene related but actually not?



Epigenetics links:
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/genome/.../hg02b002.html
post #3 of 25
Thread Starter 

Histones

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histone

Quote:
Histones act as spools around which DNA winds. This enables the compaction necessary to fit the large genomes of eukaryotes inside cell nuclei: the compacted molecule is 50,000 times shorter than an unpacked molecule.
Histone modfications in chromatin regulation

Histones undergo posttranslational modifications which alter their interaction with DNA and nuclear proteins. The H3 and H4 histones have long tails protruding from the nucleosome which can be modified at several places. Modifications of the tail include methylation, acetylation and phosphorylation (addition of a phosphate group). The core of the histones (H2A and H3) can also be modified. Combinations of modifications are thought to constitute a code, the so-called "histone code". Histone modifications act in diverse biological processes such as gene regulation, DNA repair and chromosome condensation (mitosis).

(See also Histone methyltransferase, Histone acetyltransferase)

For a detailed example of histone regulation see RNA polymerase control by chromatin structure.
http://www.web-books.com/MoBio/Free/Ch3D1.htm
Quote:
A chromosome contains five types of histones: H1 (or H5), H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. H1 and its homologous protein H5 are involved in higher-order structures. The other four types of histones associate with DNA to form nucleosomes. H1 (or H5) has about 220 residues. Other types of histones are smaller, each consisting of 100-150 residues.
post #4 of 25
Thread Starter 

Chromatin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatin

Quote:
Chromatin is found inside the nucleus of a cell. Chromatin is the structural building block of a chromosome and consists of a complex of DNA and protein in eukaryotic cells. It can be made visible by staining, hence its name, which literally means coloured material. The nucleic acids are generally in the form of double-stranded DNA - i.e. the famous DNA-double helix. The major proteins involved in chromatin are histone proteins but other non-histone chromosomal proteins are prominent too. DNA is packaged into chromatin thereby constraining the size of the molecule and allowing the cell to control expression of the chromatin packaged genes. Changes in chromatin structure are affected mainly by methylation (DNA and proteins) and acetylation (proteins). Chromatin structure is also of importance to DNA replication and DNA repair.
http://www.chromatin.net/
Quote:
Chromatin is that portion of the cell nucleus which contains all of the DNA of the nucleus in animal or plant cells. (A small amount of special DNA is also found in the mitochondria of the cell cytoplasm outside of the cell nucleus.)

I found the following from the same site interesting.

Quote:
Foreign substances such as antibiotics (actinomycin D), dyes (acridine orange), enzymes (DNase I), and complex carbohydrates (phytohemagglutinin) also penetrate the cell nucleus to the chromatin, where they also may have stimulatory or inhibitory effects on RNA or DNA synthesis.
post #5 of 25
Thread Starter 
http://www.mothering.com/discussions...=387223&page=1
Posted by Momtezuma Tuatara in the above thread.
Quote:
Discussion ~ autism.
Intellectual discussion.

If:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...t_uids=16360218
Quote:
Elevated cytokine levels in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Molloy CA, Morrow AL, Meinzen-Derr J, Schleifer K, Dienger K, Manning-Courtney P, Altaye M, Wills-Karp M.

Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5041, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, United States; Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 4002, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, United States.

This study compared production of IL-2, IFN-gamma, IL-4, IL-13, IL-5 and IL-10 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 20 children with autism spectrum disorder to those from matched controls. Levels of all Th2 cytokines were significantly higher in cases after incubation in media alone, but the IFN-gamma/IL-13 ratio was not significantly different between cases and controls. Cases had significantly higher IL-13/IL-10 and IFN-gamma/IL-10 than controls. Conclusion: Children with ASD had increased activation of both Th2 and Th1 arms of the adaptive immune response, with a Th2 predominance, and without the compensatory increase in the regulatory cytokine IL-10.

PMID: 16360218 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
so plainly, as I've said umpteen times, I've never met an autistic child with a "normal" immune system. Something has "happened"...

And if there is no genetic/immunological link in terms of parents, then the cause must be demethylation; and the source epigenetic.

So......

Why are they so stubborn about looking at vaccines in general (rather than just mercury in particular)?

Just thinking out loud...
Ok, so the Th's are what I would call T-cells. The same things you see on medical tv drama bits, ie. "her t-cell count was..." They are helpers to the T-cells. They are important because
Quote:
TH cells are involved in activating and directing other immune cells, and are particularly important during the establishment of the acquired immune system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th2_cell


So when the study said:
Quote:
Levels of all Th2 cytokines were significantly higher in cases after incubation in media alone,
it is saying that the autism cases have a high th2 count, which means that they have an abnormal immune system?(see my public school education at work here )

http://www.utmb.edu/otoref/Grnds/All...-tx-050216.htm
Quote:
Cytokines derived from Th2 cells mediate allergic inflammation through activating eosinophils, promoting mast cell development, regulating immunoglobulin isotype switching to IgE, and modulating adhesion molecule expression.
When the study said:
Quote:
Cases had significantly higher IL-13/IL-10 and IFN-gamma/IL-10 than controls.
That again is another sign that they have highly unusual immune systems.

http://www.medterms.com/script/main/...ticlekey=25650
Quote:
nterleukin-10: Abbreviated IL-10. An antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive substance produced within the body. IL-10 plays a role in the regulation of immune responses. It is secreted by antigen-presenting cells, promotes the development of immunologic tolerance, and suppresses the production of inflammatory cytokines. The gene for IL-10 is in chromosome region 1q31-q32.
I left out IL-13 but here is some on IFN-gamma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferon-gamma
Quote:
IFN-g has antiviral, immunoregulatory and anti-tumour properties. It alters transcription in up to 30 genes producing a variety of physiological and cellular responses. Activation by IFN-g is achieved via a heterodimer receptor consisting of IFNGR1 & IFNGR2 (interferon gamma receptor). IFN-g binding to the receptor activates the JAK-STAT pathway
again affecting the immune system.

So that is why MT said:
Quote:
so plainly, as I've said umpteen times, I've never met an autistic child with a "normal" immune system. Something has "happened"....

And if there is no genetic/immunological link in terms of parents, then the cause must be demethylation; and the source epigenetic.
So if methylation is
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/...ticlekey=26387
Definition of Methylation
Quote:
On a DNA level, the addition of a methyl group to a cytosine residue to convert it to 5-methylcytosine. Methylation of DNA occurs at CpG sites, where cytosine (C) lies next to guanine (G). The CpG sites are in regions near the promoters of a genes. These regions are known as CpG islands. The state of methylation of CpG islands is critical to both gene activity and gene expression.
all I really need to know is demethylation will really screw with the genes/gene expression (or is that wishful thinking?)

as expressed in the following link
(disregard the idiotic comments at the top if you click the link)
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/ma...ticlekey=26741
Quote:
Though some speculation exists regarding this link, Deth and his colleagues found that exposure to toxins, such as ethanol and heavy metals (including lead, aluminum and the ethylmercury-containing preservative thimerosal) potently interrupt growth factor signaling, causing adverse effects on methylation reactions (i.e. the transfer of carbon atoms). Methylation, in turn, plays a significant role in regulating normal DNA function and gene expression, and is critical to proper neurological development in infants and children. Scientists and practitioners have identified an increase in diagnoses of autism and ADHD in particular, though the reasons why are largely unknown.
All of the info in the first study pointed to immune system abnormalities and
since vaccines main job is to screw with the immune system it makes sense to me that it would be looked at. (after a few hours of frying my brain, I now have small shreds of knowledge to back up what I instinctively knew and MT pointed out for us)
post #6 of 25
Thread Starter 

on to the next article

http://www.mothering.com/discussions...55#post4337455
posted by Momtezuma Tuatara
Article: What are the limits of adjuvanticity?
Authors: Gisueppe Del Giudice et al.
Journal Vaccine 20 (2002) S38-S41

Quote:
Quote:
It is know that in many instances, antigen-specific titers do not correlate with protection. In addition very little is know on parameters of cell-mediated immunity which could be considered as surrogates or protection....

For example, it is well documented that aluminium salts failed to behave an appropriate vaccine adjuvants for influenza vaccines, and for various recombinant antigens and synthetic peptides...

For the elimination of intravellular micro-organiss it is crucial to activate preferentially Th1-type (inflammatory) responses, whereas Th2-type (antibody) responses play a pivotal role in the induction of neutralising antibodies against extracellular microbes. The only adjuvants used so far in himans such as aluminium salts are powerful inducers of the Th2-type responses. Indeed they poorly commit cells to produce PFN-y, TNF-a and other cytokines and very poorly activate CD8+(cytolytic) cells. A large part of the research on vaccine adjuvants has been focused on ways for preferential induction of Th1-type effector functions...This research has been slowed by the lack of knowledge of the mechanisms of action of most adjuvants, and this of the predictability of the quality of immune response(s) a given adjuvant will induce....
Thus MF59 (squalene) like aluminium salts, preferentially polarises the T-cell responses towards a Th2-type functional phenotype....

It has been hypothesised that adjuvants work through a depot effect by inducing persistence of antigens and through an inflammatory effect with induction of cytokines crucial for priming of the immune response. It is thus, likely that the mechanism underlying the adjuvanticity are, at least partly, also responsible for the reactogenicity observed. In other terms, reactigenicity could represent a "fee" to be paid to adjuvanticity and finally, to efficacy... for example, MP59 (squalene) induces a higher degree of mild side effects (such as local pain, erythema etc) as compared to the conventional non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine... however, the use of MF59 did not increase the rate of serious side effects with were observed also with the vaccine without adjuvant
I already know a little about titers (correct me please if I am wrong)
they rise and fall according to the bodies immunity, and can be tested against specific diseases.

But before I really started reading the article, my eye was caught by the mention of aluminum (or aluminumumum, as I like to say it )
Before I start looking at what the "insert expletive here" is meant by ajuvanted I just wanted to ask a little about aluminum.

From the first time I started questioning whether my son "needed" vaccinations and if they were safe the presence of metals in the vaccines has bothered me. I found conflicting info on the web, some articles state that aluminum leaves the body through urine and feces, but the ones that explain how aluminum affects the brain etc. don't mention this.
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/...ticlekey=39609
Quote:
Aluminum in the bloodstream may lead to neurological symptoms and may be fatal.Aluminum toxicity occurs in people with renal insufficiency who are treated by dialysis with aluminum-contaminated solutions or oral agents that contain aluminum. The clinical manifestations of aluminum toxicity include anemia, bone disease, and progressive dementia with increased concentrations of aluminum in the brain. Prolonged intravenous feeding of preterm infants with solutions containing aluminum is associated with impaired neurologic development.

Aluminum metal is silver-white and flexible. It is often used in cooking utensils, containers, appliances, and building materials. It is also used in paints and fireworks; to produce glass, rubber, and ceramics; and in consumer products such as antacids, astringents, buffered aspirin, food additives, and antiperspirants.
I am having problems finding information about aluminum salts and what the difference is between the two, if it is as toxic ....

In work... I thought I was done for the night, but DS woke up. Now I am wide awake.


Quote:
antigen-specific titers do not correlate with protection.
http://www.cehs.siu.edu/fix/medmicro/genimm.htm
Quote:
Antigen (Ag): A molecule which elicits a specific immune response when introduced into an animal. More specifically, antigenic (immunogenic) substances are:

1. Generally large molecules (>10,000 daltons in molecular weight),
2. Structurally complex (proteins are usually very antigenic),
3. Accessible (the immune system must be able to contact the molecule), and
4. Foreign (not recognizable as "self").
Quote:
titer = measure of the amount of antibody in the animal's serum per unit volume
I took this to mean that the amount of immunity ( as shown by the titers) to a specific disease was not the actual degree of immunity. Kind of like a false positive, but in varying degrees?


Quote:
parameters of cell-mediated immunity
was the next phrase to make my head spin. Pretty cool stuff...

Quote:
The human body can respond to antigen in many different ways. These fall into two major categories:

* antibody-mediated immunity. Antibodies, dissolved in blood, lymph, and other body fluids bind the antigen and trigger a response to it. (This form of immunity is also called humoral immunity.)
Discussion of antibodies
* cell-mediated immunity (CMI). T cells (lymphocytes) bind to the surface of other cells that display the antigen and trigger a response. The response may involve
o other lymphocytes and
o any of the other white blood cells (leukocytes)
back to the t-cells again

more on the cell mediated immunity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_mediated_immunity
Quote:
Cell-mediated immunity is an immune response that does not involve antibodies but rather involves the activation of macrophages and natural killer cells, the production of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, and the release of various cytokines in response to an antigen. Cellular immunity protects the body by:

1. activating antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes that are able to lyse body cells displaying epitopes of foreign antigen on their surface, such as virus-infected cells, cells with intracellular bacteria, and cancer cells displaying tumor antigens;
2. activating macrophages and natural killer cells, enabling them to destroy intracellular pathogens; and
3. stimulating cells to secrete a variety of cytokines that influence the function of other cells involved in adaptive immune responses and innate immune responses.

Cell-mediated immunity is directed primarily at microbes that survive in phagocytes and microbes that infect non-phagocytic cells. It is most effective in removing virus-infected cells, but also participates in defending against fungi, protozoans, cancers, and intracellular bacteria. It also plays a major role in transplant rejection.



So antibodies are...pretty darn nifty.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibody
Quote:
An antibody is a protein used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign objects like bacteria and viruses. Each antibody recognizes a specific antigen unique to its target.
Quote:
Antibodies that recognize viruses can block these directly by their sheer size. The virus will be unable to dock to a cell and infect it, hindered by the antibody. They can also agglutinate them so the phagocytes can capture them. Antibodies that recognize bacteria mark them for ingestion by macrophages. Together with the plasma component complement, antibodies can kill bacteria directly. They neutralize toxins by binding with them.

It is important to note that antibodies cannot attack pathogens within cells, and certain viruses "hide" inside cells (as part of the lysogenic cycle) for long periods of time to avoid them. This is the reason for the chronic nature of many minor skin diseases (such as cold sores); any given outbreak is quickly suppressed by the immune system, but the infection is never truly eradicated because some cells retain viruses that will resume it later.
But I guess the difference is that antibodies are just proteins that float around like mall security gaurds until they see the bad guys, tag them for destruction or bind to them directly and take them down, while cell-mediated immunity is more specialized?

Quote:
elimination of intravellular micro-organiss
I am having difficulty with this... I can't find a def for intravellular, althouth it is mentioned on several web articles. I also couldn't find anything for micro-organiss. I'll go on the assumption that it equates to "elimination of intracellular micro-organisims"
Quote:
For the elimination of intravellular micro-organiss it is crucial to activate preferentially Th1-type (inflammatory) responses, whereas Th2-type (antibody) responses play a pivotal role in the induction of neutralising antibodies against extracellular microbes.
So is this saying that to eliminate intercellular micro-organisms (bacteria/virus and possibly fungus although I don't think that is applicable>?) you need to activate the th-1 (see above replies for more info on these). To eliminate microbes that don't actually invade the cells themselves it is more important to activate the th-2's. ?

I found these articles, but they would require a whole week for me to get through, might be interesting for those of you who are already medical godlets though:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Citation
Quote:
indicating that the persistence of IL-12 may be the essential determinant in maintaining durable cell-mediated immune responses for an intracellular parasitic infection.
http://www.hms.harvard.edu/news/rele...096antrax.html
Apparently they are using the Anthrax toxin as a delivery boy for intracellular vaccines now.

http://www.natx.com/DNAVACS.html
and this, which on brief review is just scary.

So... moving on
Quote:
The only adjuvants used so far in himans such as aluminium salts are powerful inducers of the Th2-type responses. Indeed they poorly commit cells to produce PFN-y, TNF-a and other cytokines and very poorly activate CD8+(cytolytic) cells.
adjuvants:[QUOTE] increases the ability of an antigen to stimulate the immune system.[QUOTE]
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/...rticlekey=2150

http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/antibody/overview.htm

Quote:
It has been hypothesised that adjuvants work through a depot effect by inducing persistence of antigens and through an inflammatory effect with induction of cytokines crucial for priming of the immune response. It is thus, likely that the mechanism underlying the adjuvanticity are, at least partly, also responsible for the reactogenicity observed. In other terms, reactigenicity could represent a "fee" to be paid to adjuvanticity and finally, to efficacy... for example, MP59 (squalene) induces a higher degree of mild side effects (such as local pain, erythema etc) as compared to the conventional non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine... however, the use of MF59 did not increase the rate of serious side effects with were observed also with the vaccine without adjuvant
Holy breakthrough batman! without looking up anything else, I think I've got it. (It was pretty plain before I started all this, but even more so now) To me that is just saying that whatever it is that lets the adjuvant (ex. aluminum salts) "induce persistence of antigens" and "induction of cytokines crucial for priming of the immune response" is not yet understood. And whatever that "mechanism" is could be what causes reactions to vaccines. The more "pep" the adjuvant gives the vacc, the higher the chance of reactions. I wish it said that the rate of serious side effects were about equal, but that is how I'm taking "the use of MF59 ... vaccine without adjuvant".

From the original post by MT:


Quote:
stop here to say two things.

They didn't look at Lupus, and those who have read my previous posts on aluminium switching on dendritic cells, and them not turning off, and that being a mechanism of lupus, will see what's happening here....
I'm going to skip this for the time being, because I really don't feel like looking up dedritic dells!


Quote:
to continue
Quote:
In addition it is crucial to extend studies in the attempt to define correlates of protection for the most important vaccine targets both at the level of antibody [b]and celullar responses and at the systemic and mucosal levels


So we know that they often don't knowwhat the correlates of protection are.

They dont' know how to define cellular responses either at systemic and mucosal levels, except on a broad assumptive theoretical base.

We know that they don't know much about how aluminium or any adjuvant works. He just said that above.

We know actually, they don't know much about how vaccines work.
this really bothers me! Actually it makes me (insert expletive here) off.

Quote:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...hal-2305100.php
Quote:
Vaccines work simply by producing antibodies, right? Well, probably not. And this misconception coupled with basic ignorance of how they do work is stalling the urgent quest for an AIDS vaccine, claim leading HIV researchers. They say no one has bothered to find out how... vaccines like polio, measles and hepatitis B actually protect people from disease.
Course, that "protection" is a huge sweeping assumption, but lets put that to one side right now.. (don't mention 7 polio vaccines prior to getting polio, to my husband...)

So if they don't know any of this stuff, how can they assess the significance of otherwise of cytokine increases in children with autism?

With regard to epigenetics, they are going to have to take it seriously, because the genetic inheritance argument just doesn't hold water in the majority of cases.
I'm going to continue this on a new "reply" as I want to look harder at methylation. It comes up in almost every article/definition/slideshow I've found.
post #7 of 25
Epigenetics; This link explains the histone factor better for me:

http://www.dukemednews.org/news/article.php?id=9322
Quote:
the environmental exposure triggers a chemical change in the body or brain that mobilizes a group of molecules – called a methyl group. The methyl group attaches to the control segment of a gene and either silences – or alternately activates – the gene. Either way, the gene veers off its intended course of activity.
Duke scientists describe methylation as putting gum on a light switch. The switch isn't broken, but the gum blocks its function.

Such stealth changes often occur in embryonic or fetal development, but they set the stage for an adult's susceptibility to a host of diseases and behavioral responses, the data suggest. Moreover, epigenetic changes – so named because they sit on top of the gene and leave its sequence unchanged – can also be passed down from one generation to the next, said Jirtle.
You quote
Quote:
Foreign substances such as antibiotics (actinomycin D), dyes (acridine orange), enzymes (DNase I), and complex carbohydrates (phytohemagglutinin) also penetrate the cell nucleus to the chromatin, where they also may have stimulatory or inhibitory effects on RNA or DNA synthesis.
can also be seen as the basis for allergic responses to vaccines. Antibiotics affect a lot of things, and when the body decided that it doesn't like antibiotics, it causes changes in how the body functions, hence allergies and anaphylaxis. When they hypothesise about a potentially genetic susceptibility to allergy to antibiotics, I wouldn't consider that valid. The body doesn't like antibiotics and has a hissy fit. In the absense of antibiotics, it works just fine.... sort of like an epigenetic "chewing gum" causing a different response.

IMO the function of epigenetics is the same in antibiotic reactions as in autism, but obviously a different pathway... both involve immune responses as a response to epigenetic changes...

Quote:
Originally quoted by pumpkinsmama:

All of the info in the first study pointed to immune system abnormalities and
since vaccines main job is to screw with the immune system it makes sense to me that it would be looked at.
Not necessarily. The answer could be that mercury causes epigenetic changes on various "conductors" of the immune system thereby changing their function from 'normal' to abnormal. The abnormalities in the immune system may not originate so much with the immune system itself, but with a deranged conducting system now running amok.

Quote:
I already know a little about titers (correct me please if I am wrong) they rise and fall according to the bodies immunity, and can be tested against specific diseases.
True, but their absense doesn't mean you are not immune, since immunity can be cellular and not humoral, and their presence doesn't guarantee immunity because many antibodies aren't "just" one pathogen specific. For instance, Neisseria Lactima (sp?) appears to confer cross immunity in some people to other Neisseria bacteria...

Quote:
I took this to mean that the amount of immunity ( as shown by the titers) to a specific disease was not the actual degree of immunity. Kind of like a false positive, but in varying degrees?
I think this is one area where they are flailing in the dark actually. When I first started reading the extensive MRC (Medical Research council) trials for diphtheria vaccine in England, where they compared vaccinated and unvaccinated and how they "reacted" to disease, they struck many "anomalies" along the lines of situations like this:

People would come into hospital with the disease, have antibodies through the roof, and they would make no difference.

Staff members who treated these people sometimes had absolutely no antibodies, but never got diphtheria.

When you read the article you sort of get the impression they just gave up and shrugged.

I read an article about a fully vaccinated man who presented with tetanus and values way higher than the supposed "protection" level. Why? NO explanation. Another case the same, the person was on chemo, and they explained that his antibodies were biologically intact, but immunologically inactive. In other words, they didn't work. Why? : It was assumed to be the chemo. So what about the other guy not on chem? :

Aluminium:

this provides another part of the puzzle to the epigenetic bit too....

While they assume most of the effects of aluminum are unknown, 99% of the known effects are very, very bad. You can find a gazillion papers that show all the things that aluminum does once it's in the body:
-it goes directly to the brain
-where it kills brain cells (hey- those can't be replaced)
-and demyelinates neurons
-it causes macrophagic myofasciitis
-1/3 of MMF cases develop into MS or other serious neurological illnesses
-it interrupts or interferes with several brain functions
-it persists at the injection site for many years
-it induces monocytes to differentiate into dendritic cells
-it induces dendritic cells to constitutively express antigen
-it induces overexpression of antigen
-antigen overexpression abnormally stimulates T-cell proliferation
-which causes T-cell autoimmune dysfunction
-it stimulates autoantibodies involved in autoimmune disorders
-it damages the blood brain barrier
-it is has higher brain toxicity in infants

-it induces dendritic cells to constitutively express antigen Explanation:

Aluminium is put into vaccines, because without it, the body will not react to weak strains of antigens. Aluminium is highly reactive, and is a Th2 "skewer". This is the whole reason why aluminum is added to vaccines.

Aluminum causes monocytes to preferentially become dendritic cells. These cells are the antigen presenting cells. They won't react to just, say, "pertussis" on its own. The Aluminium, wakes up, and locks these antigen presenting cells in the 'on' postition. It also creates more APC's (antigen presenting cells), which is the whole point.

But that can also be a problem. Take SLE for example (Systemic lupus erythematosus)

Researchers know that for some reason dendritic cells present antigen for too long and this allows abnormal antibodies to be produced: autoantibodies. Most SLE researchers think it is because of some genetic reason but it could also be aluminum. Antigen presenting cells from vaccines exist solely to promote an immune response: aluminum ensures that it is an abnormal response.

You need to understand what aluminium can and does do in the body to see how it might act. That is very dependant on the individual immune system, and the nutrition of the person.

J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2003 Dec;49(6):409-13.
Alum augments the experimental allergenicity of Kunitz-type soybean trypsin inhibitor independent of the antigen-adsorption.

Quote:
In order to inspect the significance of the adsorbing property in the adjuvant activity to enhance IgE production, we immunized BALB/c mice against Kunitz-type soybean trypsin inhibitor (KSTI), the most potent experimental allergen among soybean proteins, associated with Aluminum hydroxide (alum) or DEAE-Sephadex particles. The production of immunoglobulin isotypes was analyzed at the various amounts, 3-3,000 microg per mouse, of the antigen dosages. In our experiments, although alum did not adsorb KSTI significantly, it augmented the total and the antigen-specific IgE without affecting the optimal range of the antigen dosage. On the other hand, alum did not effectively enhance the production of the other immunoglobulin isotypes. The production of immunoglobulin isotypes other than IgE increased dose-dependently on the antigen. These results ensured our previous finding that another protein, ovalbumin, was used as the antigen. We also demonstrated that the adsorption of KSTI by DEAE-Sephadex in the immunizing vehicle resulted in the requirement of more KSTI for accomplishing the equal immunity in BALB/c mice compared to the control. Moreover, we demonstrated that, regardless of the inability to adsorb KSTI, alum exerted its adjuvant activity only when it was co-injected with the antigen. These results showed that some biochemical effect, other than adsorptive activity, to enhance the production of the antigen-specific IgE resides in alum.
So this then impacts on allergies as well, because Aluminium primarily makes IgE antibodies, which are the ones that the allergy tests look for:

Immunology and Cell Biology (2004) 82: 497–505
Aluminium compounds for use in vaccines

Quote:
...the literature provides examples of publications where injection of adjuvant and unadsorbed antigen at distant sites leads to immunostimulation towards the antigen.
In otherwords, if a baby has eaten something at the same time as the vaccine with aluminium is given, there is every chance that the aluminium in the vaccine can produce antibodies which, if produced at the same time as that antigen is in the body can produce an allergy to that, whether it is a component of the vaccine, such as gelatine, or a food that the baby has eaten, or more remotely something a breastfeeding mother has eaten, and is now being "eaten" through breastmilk. The same could also apply to inhaled antigens, such as pollen etc, whereby if a child gets a lung full of mite dust, or cat hair, or something environmental at the same time as a vaccine then, given that aluminium stimulates and produces allergy antibodies, wouldn't we expect to see allergies following vaccines with Aluminium in them?

Lets look at other aspects of aluminium as well:

Interestingly macrophages are affected by aluminum as well. They become loaded with aluminum particles which disrupts their function. When macrophages cross the blood brain barrier they take the aluminum with them.

Aluminum can integrate into molecular functions but it is first and foremost a neurotoxin. Which is why the affinity for the brain and when it gets there it demyelinates neurons. When that happens you get all the symptoms of multiple sclerosis.

Aluminum also alters the permeability of the blood-brain barrier making the brain more accessible to other toxins that you don't want in there. If you have flouride in your water, the combined toxicity is much higher again...

So. Aluminum invades certain cell types, especially monocytes and macrophages. It critically alters their function in a way that is extremely harmful to the person affected.

Aluminum hydroxide in vaccines is highly reactive and separates spontaneously. And since it is injected through the skin right into your tissue it is instantly absorbed and enters the brain. It’s not just a potential risk with vaccines – every AlOH injection puts aluminum right into your brain – every single one. The only known cause of MMF (Macrophagic myofasciitis) is aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. And fully one third of MMF cases develop into multiple sclerosis.

So we are looking at auto-immunity as well.

Gherardi et al. 2001 Macrophagic myofasciitis lesions assess long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide in muscle. Brain, 124:1821-1831
[If you read only one paper about aluminum this should be it.]

Redhead et al. 1992. Aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines transiently increase aluminum levels in murine brain tissue. Pharmacology and Toxicology, 70:278-280
[Aluminum from vaccines enters the brain almost immediately after it is injected. Also, measurable amounts of aluminum are present at the injection site for up to 8 years after vaccination.]

After you understand that aluminum from vaccines will always enter the brain, these make for good reading:

Yokel. 2000. The toxicology of aluminum in the brain: a review. Neurotoxicology Oct;21(5):813-828
[This paper reviews all the ways that Al affects the brain. It is not about vaccines. Also you could just do a medline search on aluminum and brain and you will find literally a ton of papers describing the adverse effects of Al on the brain. Al is a very potent neurotoxin if it can gain access to the brain.]

Verstraeten et al. 1997. Myelin is a preferential target of aluminum-mediated oxidative damage. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 344(2):289-294
[Myelin is the protective protein that coats neurons and covers the spinal cord. Damage to this protein is referred to as demyelination. Multiple sclerosis and autism are prime examples of demyelinating diseases where damage to myelin causes neurological dysfunction.]

Campbell et al. 2000. Aluminum-induced oxidative events and its relation to inflammation: a role for the metal in Alzheimer’s disease. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 46:721-730
[Alzheimer’s is not a genetic disease. It is an age-dependent response to accumulated heavy metal poisoning.]

URL's:

http://www.e2med.com/index.cfm?fusea...DChapIdx=64174

Quote:
Aluminium hydroxide is known to potently stimulate the immune system and to shift responses towards a Th-2 profile. It is possible that persistent systemic immune activation that fails to switch off constitutes the pathophysiological basis of the chronic fatigue syndrome associated with macrophagic myofasciitis and possibly in patients with post-infectious chronic fatigue and idiopathic chronic fatigue syndrome. Therefore, the WHO have recommended an epidemiological survey, currently conducted by the French agency AFSSAPS, aimed at substantiating a possible link between focal macrophagic myofasciitis (or previous immunization with aluminium-containing vaccines) and systemic symptoms.

Interestingly, a special emphasis has been put on Th-2 biased immune responses as a possible explanation of chronic fatigue and associated manifestations known as the Gulf War syndrome. Results from studies of MF may well open new avenues for the aetiological investigation of this syndrome. Indeed, both the type and structure of symptoms are strikingly similar between Gulf War veterans and patients with MF. Multiple vaccinations performed over a short period of time in the Persian Gulf area have been recognized as the main risk factor for the Gulf War syndrome. Moreover, the war vaccine against anthrax, given by a 6-shot regimen, seems to be critically involved and contains aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant. Squalene is also present and may be another Th2 adjuvant. If safety concerns about the long-term effects of aluminium hydroxide are confirmed, it will be essential to develop novel, alternative adjuvants to re-establish confidence in vaccination and the huge benefits for public health that it provides worldwide.


Other URLs:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Second, though you say its not an aluminium issue it related to the original post in that the fact that thiomersal is toxic has been known a long time

Why is it, that only Russia actually studied the issue of thomersal in vaccines, and some time ago, at that? Why did it take USA so long to stop avoiding the issue? If they avoided that issue, what else are they avoiding?

Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 1983 Mar;(3):87-92 Related Articles, Links

[Evaluation of the toxic action of prophylactic and therapeutic preparations on cell cultures. III. The detection of toxic properties in medical biological preparations by the degree of cell damage in the L132 continuous cell line]

[Article in Russian]

Kravchenko AT, Dzagurov SG, Chervonskaia GP.

The methods of the quality control of medical biological preparations, including tests on animals, do not ensure the complete absence of toxicity in a final product. The use of the method of "subcultures with the introduced preparation" makes it possible to determine the toxicity of both specific and nonspecific components of vaccines and sera from the number of dead and damaged cells. The toxic action of preparations kills and damages the cells at the site of injection, thus inducing the formation of autoantigens whose effect on the body cannot be predicted. Thus thimerosal, commonly used as preservative, has been found not only to render its primary toxic effect, but also capable of changing the properties of cells. This fact suggests that the use of thimerosal for the preservation of medical biological preparations, especially those intended for children, is inadmissible.

PMID: 6845931 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Third:

http://news.bmn.com/news/story?day=030807&story=1

Vaccine ingredients could trigger autoimmune disease
6 August 2003 15:00 GMTby Helen Dell

Mineral oils that are common components of vaccines induce the production of pathogenic autoantibodies and an inflammatory immune response when injected into mice, report US researchers. They suggest that these oils could be inducing autoimmunity in susceptible people. The oils are used as adjuvants in vaccines - substances that enhance the immunogenicity of an antigen. It has been known for some time that some mineral oils can induce autoimmunity in the form of arthritis, indeed they are injected into mice to produce animal models for arthritis.

Carry on Pumpkinsmama... you should be enjoying this by now...
post #8 of 25
Holy Cow, Pumpkinsmama!
You just jumped in head first, huh?
This thread should definitely be archived. Congratulations!

So many people are just terrified of medical info. But really, all it takes is dedication to get a feel for it.
Good for you for not buying into that whole "Really, this is far, far too complex for you to ever understand...so just do as we say and go with the program" crud.
post #9 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamakay
Holy Cow, Pumpkinsmama!
You just jumped in head first, huh?
This thread should definitely be archived. Congratulations!

So many people are just terrified of medical info. But really, all it takes is dedication to get a feel for it.
Good for you for not buying into that whole "Really, this is far, far too complex for you to ever understand...so just do as we say and go with the program" crud.
This is something I've always wondered about. Why are we as mothers so scared to go and have a look in the books that doctors use?

24 years ago, when I started, my doctor said "Oh, you won't understand it." But you know what? Once I got my head around the terminology, and read a few texts it was reasonably easy to understand the theory behind what little they know.

the next field you need to look at, pumpinsmama, is haematology and exactly what your blood test results mean.

When I go to the doctor, I tell him what tests I want done, not the other way around....
post #10 of 25
Thread Starter 
Quote:
You just jumped in head first, huh?
I wish someone would send me a lifejacket! I feel like I'm drowning in information. Thank you for the support s


Momtezuma Tuatara, thank you for taking the time to resolve some of those questions. I really am becoming more and fascinated as I reach a better understanding of the terms and phrases. I would like to copy your reply to a new thread, because I don't believe that knowledge about aluminum is as widespread as thimerisol/mercury. Even in this forum I have seen posts from people looking for mercury free shots with no mention of worry about the other ingredients.

I'm going to post this while I see you are still here, but I have not gotten all the way through the information you provided yet. Thanks again!
post #11 of 25
Thread Starter 
Ok...so epigenetic changes can be passed to the next generation. I am totally digging the light switch analogy.

I thought titers were black and white, no questions unanswered, iron backed science. I'm glad you pointed out those studies. I guess it is too much to ask for garuntees with anything medical!

Quote:
When you read the article you sort of get the impression they just gave up and shrugged.
: but really kind of at the same time. I can picture them sitting around looking at the numbers and scratching their heads. At work we call results like that PFM...pure ..f.. magic. Happens a lot, we just shrug and carry on. But we aren't working on human beings.

As for how Russian research documents risks to thimerisol in vaccines decades before the USA attempts to limit it... do you think it has anything to do with the vaccine factories in Russia being gov. sponsered and the ones in the states more commercialized? (I don't have much info to go on, the web was not my friend with this issue) But my gut instinct said that Russian vacc manufactures (if they were not global exporters bringing in billions in revenue) were concerned with the health of their nation whereas US companies were simply trying to turn a profit. They had a product that sold, why bother refining it. (just shooting from the hip)

Are there any ingredients in vaccines that don't cause harm?


To be honest I am really in a state of shock about my own naivety(sp?) with regard to the medical profession as a whole right now. My husband and I just got done discussing some of the new things I've learned (thank you, again) and how they could affect our child. He still thinks we should delay vacc , but is slowly coming around as I get more info here and other places.

I am going to take a break, look up macrophages and play with DS, but I'll be back on later tonight.
post #12 of 25
Why copy the info on aluminium to another thread? I've put that information on the board a gazillion times.

:exageration... I don't have 2,694 posts for nothing..
post #13 of 25
Quote:
Are there any ingredients in vaccines that don't cause harm?
Anything that goes into your body by an abnormal route, is treated by the body as an invading antigen, regardless of its toxicity rating or lack thereof. Therefore the answer to that question again, is that it depends on the person's body.

I'm allergic to every antibiotic under the sun. But you might not be. THAT is the basis of epigenetics. If doctors understood that so much is a lottery based on what the body has experienced, and the stresses it is under, then perhaps they would stop automatically reaching for the prescription pad and start thinking.

If you are totally in shock about your naivity about the medical profession, wait until you start really studying the food industry and modern agriculture.

And... the education system.
post #14 of 25
Quote:
If you are totally in shock about your naivity about the medical profession, wait until you start really studying the food industry and modern agriculture.

And... the education system.
I second this, and I feel that I know very little about all of it but I know enough to know that there are huge problems!
post #15 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuppyFluffer
I second this, and I feel that I know very little about all of it but I know enough to know that there are huge problems!
And major corruption!
post #16 of 25
Thread Starter 
I have learned a lot in the past couple of days! You are really challenging me MT, the modern agriculture studies will have to be postponed until I have this one in check...

I love this forum, there is so much to learn from the people who come here. It makes me hopeful for my children that there are at least some people who are actively thinking about the effects of how they live, and how to try to reduce some of the damage that is being done to the world and the people living in it.



http://www.people.virginia.edu/~rjh9u/macro.html
really cool picture of macrophage attacking bacteria


Quote:
Interestingly macrophages are affected by aluminum as well. They become loaded with aluminum particles and this disrupts their function. When macrophages cross the blood brain barrier they take the aluminum with them.
Dedritic cells
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendritic_cell

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/constitutive
Quote:
3. Of or relating to the synthesis of a protein or an enzyme at a constant rate regardless of physiological demand or the concentration of a substrate.
Quote:
The only known cause of MMF (Macrophagic myofasciitis) is aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. And fully one third of MMF cases develop into multiple sclerosis.
OMG. And of course the CDC has nothing on it about MMF. How very typical.
post #17 of 25
Thread Starter 
post #18 of 25
this thread should be archived.
post #19 of 25
bump
post #20 of 25
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Struggling to understand more re:disc~autism and terms