I'm curious as to what others would do if they thought their child had a reaction...(please note I'm not trying to start a debate, I'm just curious if this is a "normal" reaction by a parent). Although I won't vaccinate my 7 week old, I can understand why others choose to...but it seems like there would be a point at which you would have to take a second look at vaccines...
I post on a December 2005 birth board on a different bulletin board, and a few days ago someone posted that her 2 month old had a reaction to her shots--102 degree fever (after Tylenol), vomiting, severe congestion, and swelling at injection site. Several people posted recommendations that she research adverse reactions, etc. Today she posted that her child was better and she hoped the 4 month shots went better...she gave absolutely no indication that she was going to do any research at all or consider the possibility that the shots might not be good for her child.
When I read stories of people whose children have had reactions and suffered permanent damage, and they tell how the child reacted to one set of shots and yet they continued to give them, I never understood it...but apparently it still happens!
Maybe it's just because I'm a research freak, but if I hear that something might not be good for me/my child or something causes negative side effects, I'm going to look into it and not trust that the status quo is accurate. I can remember at about age 10 learning that a family in my church didn't vaccinate (I was fully vaccinated)...I thought it was weird but decided to research it before I had kids...which I did 15 years later.
Anyway, I'm wondering if it is just me or if others (especially those who do vax) find it unbelievable that someone would blow off a reaction like this.
I post on a December 2005 birth board on a different bulletin board, and a few days ago someone posted that her 2 month old had a reaction to her shots--102 degree fever (after Tylenol), vomiting, severe congestion, and swelling at injection site. Several people posted recommendations that she research adverse reactions, etc. Today she posted that her child was better and she hoped the 4 month shots went better...she gave absolutely no indication that she was going to do any research at all or consider the possibility that the shots might not be good for her child.
When I read stories of people whose children have had reactions and suffered permanent damage, and they tell how the child reacted to one set of shots and yet they continued to give them, I never understood it...but apparently it still happens!
Maybe it's just because I'm a research freak, but if I hear that something might not be good for me/my child or something causes negative side effects, I'm going to look into it and not trust that the status quo is accurate. I can remember at about age 10 learning that a family in my church didn't vaccinate (I was fully vaccinated)...I thought it was weird but decided to research it before I had kids...which I did 15 years later.
Anyway, I'm wondering if it is just me or if others (especially those who do vax) find it unbelievable that someone would blow off a reaction like this.









). With the exemption form came a sheet of paper called the risks and benefits of vaccinations. It extolled the wonders of vaccines and demonized simple childhood illnesses. Then it glossed over almost all reactions. If you read that paper and actually believed it, then you wouldn't think twice about vaccinating your child. I personally will never vax again, but I do understand why so many people do.



Shannon, I'm so so so sorry to hear your son's story. Thank you for sharing it. Wishing you peace and health.
I toatally didn't understand that one at all. It has got to be a cultural thing, drs are always reight and its just what you got to do.