Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › Nasty little commentary on breastfeeding
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Nasty little commentary on breastfeeding  

post #1 of 50
Thread Starter 
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...ck=1&cset=true

Quote:
To this day, the La Leche League, a leading breast-feeding organization, and other groups blame the formula makers for the 1.5 million non-breast-fed babies who die each year, ignoring the medical, cultural and economic circumstances that often doom infants. Big corporations make — horrors — profits on formula sales, so they must be duly demonized.

At the prodding of the militants, the WHO now recommends that women nurse at least until the child is 2, which would be quite a cultural sea change unless you live in a hippie commune. Other proposals call for counseling, presumably at taxpayer expense, and new laws requiring employers to provide on-site nursing and breast-pumping facilities. A statement by La Leche League in May declared that breast-feeding "challenges the view of breasts as only sex objects." That's a long way from infants' health.

Breast-feeding is a good thing. What is not good is to use government to terrorize women into abandoning a safe and nutritious substitute that millions of them have chosen for health or economic reasons. In sub-Saharan Africa, where per capita income is under $500 a year in many countries, where jobs, food and cash are matters of life and death for both sexes, and where HIV infection is rampant, it is quasi-criminal to ignore these problems in the name of ideology. Better to spend the money giving these countries the decent water supply that, more than anything else, would help the infant death rate fall.
post #2 of 50
Good grief.
post #3 of 50
what's with that last paragraph? is that some sort of attempt to show that the pittance spent on gov programs to promote bfing could instead be used to provide clean safe water to subsaharan peoples? what on earth are they implying? LLL is against clean water? i am flummoxed. what maroon wrote this stuff? the ubiquitous 'staff'?
post #4 of 50
Holy crap! the link required me to log in, can you tell me was this from a reader's letter to the editor or was some jerk paid to write a story for the LA Times spewing this junk?
post #5 of 50
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by artgoddess
Holy crap! the link required me to log in, can you tell em was this from a reader's letter to the editor or was some jerk paid to write a story for the LKA times spewing this junk?
Zoinks, I'm sorry. I got to it via a gmail alert. I believe it was commentary, not a letter to the editor.
post #6 of 50
Further proof that some people (those that write for major newspapers included) are lucky that breathing is an autonomic function.
post #7 of 50
Try bugmenot to read it.

:
post #8 of 50
Someone sounds defensive!
post #9 of 50
"Safe and nutritious substitute" my arse
post #10 of 50


That is such crap . . . my goodness.

It's cheaper to breastfeed . . . why would anyone encourage poor women to formula feed? Encourage them to breastfeed while improving their environs. Breastfeeding is better in every single way, economically and otherwise.
post #11 of 50
Wow the lengths some people will go to, to justify formulas rampant use.

I don't know what else to say about this article
post #12 of 50
drop

how repulsive! It could only have been written by a very angry ff woman.

Quote:
Other proposals call for counseling, presumably at taxpayer expense
Well, since ear infections cost $8 billion a year in America (and that's before you get to the other health issues) I'm thinking a few LCs on WIC might be a cheap alternative.

And since the formula is used at taxpayers expense ANYWAY. ARGH.
post #13 of 50
post #14 of 50
Hippie commune
post #15 of 50
Looks around the house, sees no hippies (not having a mirror handy after all) let alone a commune.....

LLL bullied the WHO into those recommendations???? That's just too pathetic.
post #16 of 50
I'd love to read the article & respond to whomever wrote it. anyone have a loggin they're willing to share? Or quote the whole article.

thanks!
Sus
post #17 of 50
""abandoning a safe and nutritious substitute""

There are no words............the whole thing is awful...but this....I simply can not process this obscene statement.......the person writing this must have suffered some extreme brain damage at some point.....i can think of no other explanation.......
post #18 of 50
Where's that barf smilie?
post #19 of 50
It was commentary, written by Charlotte Allen.
Gossamer
post #20 of 50
2nd to everything that everyone said who replied to this thread.

Thank you.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › Nasty little commentary on breastfeeding