I disagree. She said "Even if I were to sacrifice the vegetartan part (which I would never do in a million years, as I feel even more strongly about that issue..." (vegetarianism) "than I do circumcision)"
which tells me that there is something really wrong here if a mother feels more strongly about protecting animals from torture, then protecting her son from torture. This statement screams issues to me. Like perhaps this mother doesn't realize the actual TRUTH behind circumcision and the harm that it causes. She said that her first son is intact, so, OP, I'm going to give you a taste of what I saw the first few days of my oldest sons life.
I had a screaming child, who wouldn't latch on (it took much effort) was always in deep sleep due to severe traumatization, and when I changed his diaper for the first time, after the mutilation, I peeled off the guaze gingerly and saw nothing but a SWOLLEN BLOODY STUMP. what was left of his perfect penis was destroyed. Sure, weeks later the glans hardened and became "normal" for a circ'ed penis. Have you seen the videos of circumcision? what about the pics? If you are having a hospital birth, did you know that circumcising your infant in the first few days at the hospital make them around 30% MORE likely to catch the strep that is antibiotic resistant flesh eating bacterium that can cost your child his LIFE? (see www.doctorsopposingcircumcision
for their latest press release on this issue) Really, I think you need to start advocating for your CHILDREN as strongly or MORE SO then you do for some animals.
However, personally, if it were me, and my husband was insisting on mutilation (for ANY reason, including religious) I would divorce him and get a court order forbidding him from having one done. I see no reason to stay with a man who would willfully abuse my child in his first few days (again, coming from someone who did cut her first son because I didn't know better)