I've been very choosy about who I let watch my kids, for example I have a good friend who I will watch her kids but I prefer to not let her watch mine because she spanks rather liberally.
However, we recently joined the Y so I could get some time to myself to work out (which I desperately need to try and help combat my constant struggle with depression). In the child care they use time outs as a form of discipline. I say that I use "time outs" with Grace, but they are not isolated, and they are as only developmentally appropriate and a short amount of time. While the childcare workers stick to the minute per age rule, the child is just stuck in a playpen by themselves and left to cry during that time w/o understanding why they are being punished. I don't agree w/ that aspect of it, but I know Grace is in general a very easy going girl and not likely to be put in time out.... so I thought. When I picked up Grace the other day, I knew she was getting kinda wound up because I went later in the day than normal, close to her naptime which is my fault, but I was told that she had been put in time out for.... not sharing. I realize Grace looks older than she is because she is so tall (she wears 4T pants for length) and that she speaks pretty well for her age (better than some 3 year olds I know), but she's only 2. It's not developmentally appropriate IMO to expect her to share w/o modeling it for her. It really bothers me that they punished her for something that shouldn't be expected of a 2 year old. I realize these are not people w/ early childhood education to know that (you only need a high school diploma to teach preschool in Ohio which I think is weird), but it still bothers me. Gregg says I would be "wasting my breath" to tell the Y childcare workers how I want Grace to be disciplined in that manner. He doesn't think they would listen and I shouldn't bother... I disagree and think that they should listen because it is MY children.
What's your take on the situation?
However, we recently joined the Y so I could get some time to myself to work out (which I desperately need to try and help combat my constant struggle with depression). In the child care they use time outs as a form of discipline. I say that I use "time outs" with Grace, but they are not isolated, and they are as only developmentally appropriate and a short amount of time. While the childcare workers stick to the minute per age rule, the child is just stuck in a playpen by themselves and left to cry during that time w/o understanding why they are being punished. I don't agree w/ that aspect of it, but I know Grace is in general a very easy going girl and not likely to be put in time out.... so I thought. When I picked up Grace the other day, I knew she was getting kinda wound up because I went later in the day than normal, close to her naptime which is my fault, but I was told that she had been put in time out for.... not sharing. I realize Grace looks older than she is because she is so tall (she wears 4T pants for length) and that she speaks pretty well for her age (better than some 3 year olds I know), but she's only 2. It's not developmentally appropriate IMO to expect her to share w/o modeling it for her. It really bothers me that they punished her for something that shouldn't be expected of a 2 year old. I realize these are not people w/ early childhood education to know that (you only need a high school diploma to teach preschool in Ohio which I think is weird), but it still bothers me. Gregg says I would be "wasting my breath" to tell the Y childcare workers how I want Grace to be disciplined in that manner. He doesn't think they would listen and I shouldn't bother... I disagree and think that they should listen because it is MY children.
What's your take on the situation?







Developmental stages. It's not right for her to be punished. Finding another toy just as cool is the right approach. It sounds like it's easier for the childcare worker to just stick her in the playpen.
:
