Yes. ITA with mamajama's post. As ever.
post #81 of 115
3/21/06 at 5:31am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Leatherette
It just sounds like people think a gang of five year old thugs with knives is waiting to jump on their kid if they come to public school. It is melodramatic, totally inaccurate, and a little creepy (everyone else's kid is a problem child). L.
|
|
Originally Posted by Leatherette
That said, I don't know where a Kindergarten classroom would have 41 students. That doesn't sound legal. My son's class has 24, with assistants for students with special needs, extra teachers coming in to make groups smaller for reading, and lots of volunteering parents.
If my son were having lots of problems fitting into the environment, I would certainly have no qualms about making a different choice for him. I wouldn't leave him in an environment that was harming him to uphold my principles or something. I also wouldn't tell all parents to hate all public schools because I or my child had a bad experience in one of them. L. |
|
Originally Posted by cmd
I am in complete agreement with you there, Leatherette. My son is in a public school in Seattle, too, and so far has been a very positive experience.
|
| Well maybe not necessarily with knives. But I was gang beaten by five year olds. Imagine yourself with a hearing impairment and a slight speech delay being backed into a corner of a chainlink fence on the playground by a group of five year old girls, your hair grabbed, clothes torn and slapped and kicked. You go to the principal's office tell your story in tears, the guilty kids are brought in, told to apologize, but they do so while they glare at you with a look of venom. Next day you are teased in the class as a 'tattletale' and then the rest of the kids (especially the boys) join in the tirade...and the teacher does nothing...absolutely nothing. And those were on good days... Am I being melodramatic? |

| Yes, a family does have to come up with at least $4000 or more, but some families are doing without a second car, working 3 jobs, no vacations, etc. to do it. |
|
Originally Posted by sanguine_speed
I would not want my child in a private school where reality is hidden from her in that she will only meet children of a certain socioeconomic status.
|
|
Originally Posted by Leatherette
I taught at a Seattle Public School as well, and will be going back next year. I did not find it to be any more difficult than other districts I have taught in. They are all hurting for funds. To me, the hardest part of working in the public schools I have been in has been lack of funding - and that comes from the community.
|
|
Originally Posted by Leatherette
I hear that, but there are many families that wouldn't have food if they had to come up with 4000 dollars (0r more - the cheapest private school I have seen is 6500), and wouldn't be able to volunteer to make the homey little private school work, because they already needed to work three jobs anyway, with no car and not even a hope of a vacation or a day off.
L. |
|
Originally Posted by mamajama
For those opposed to public schools. What would your solution be for low-income, and single-parent families?
|