Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Attached Mama
i think that in some situations they are a good thing - like maybe in an epidemic. but i dont' think they should ever be forced! i think they have been effective in getting rid of certain diseases like polio.
|
I also was under the impression that any cases of polio in the past 50 years was from the vaccine itself.
Are the side effects and damage to the immune system worth introducing this vaccine into a normally healthy immune system, especially when less than 1% of people(unvaccinated people,and otherwise healthy people) who contract polio actually get paralytic polio, and fewer even remain paralytic. Not to mention that many people who may even contract it may not be able to tell the difference between being sick with polio or being sick with the flu!
Oh yes and vaccines can't even offer or garantee 100% safety or effectiveness.I would still have to consider the vaccination, even in an epidemic, moreso do to the dangerous additives in vaccines that either destroy nerve cells or surpress and damage(sometimes permenantly) the immune system, etc etc











: ITA. I am leaning more and more to the side that is anti-vax and am thinking I should be promoting the eradication of vaccines, rather than the eradication of disease.
How many times have I, myself, posted that there will never be an end to disease or a disease-free population?
Sorry, I just get so surprised that my brain would hold onto such false notions, so strongly, kwim?