Originally Posted by mara
I've slept with both and hands down the intact ones felt better. Wven though the guys weren't particularly good lovers, the penis itself made a huge difference. I hate sex with circed penises (sorry DH
) It feels like being slammed with a pole.
I seriously mentally cringe when I read that stuff. Thinking of the men here who might read that and feel like they've been stabbed in the gut. And, it just sucks as it isn't their fault
I have talked to a lot of women on this subject. Nearly all women who've been with both tell me that they prefer the intact penis...for some of them they say it is a subtle but good difference. There have been a few who have told me that for them the sex was only slightly different, but the foreplay/stimulation is virtually non-existant on the cut man (no skin to play with). The main difference I have heard from women is the lack of irritation after sex/different thrust (less slamming more grinding sort of thing).
Call me in the minority here, but I actually enjoy sex with my cut DH
: , though I have to say he has started restoring and I think things can only improve
. He has a looser circ so I think the huge difference is going to be from him gaining sensation and not needing the rougher stimulation. Though, I can use some of the skin he has left during foreplay for stimulation.
On one other note, I heard from a guy once who is intact (still is too), though had his two son's circ'd. He said he did it because of one bad experience he had with a woman, he woke up with her the next morning, saw it in it's flaccid state and freaked out. He had sort of gotten a complex his whole life about cleanliness and being different (he grew up in the midwest, definitely not foreskin friendly 35 years ago). Anyhow he ended up having his son done. He says now (that he knows) if someone had only told him what is lost to circumcision and everything that he knows now about cleanliness being a crock, that he wouldn't have done it to his sons. Apparently that one incident was enough to "send him over the edge" thinking he was preventing his sons mental anguish of being different. Of course, though, like you've all said, he is still intact. My dad let them do my brother, and he was intact (since passed on). What makes me the most upset about it is how difficult it is going to be for them to let their sons say whole. My own brother went on to circumcise his sons
. My mom says she never even knew what circumcision was (definitely didn't know that they amputated most of the skin of the penis...she only ever say my dad and so that was her normal), and when she saw my brother she was "horrified." That was the actual term she used. She said it was even worse that it was infected and they sent her home with this damaged little boy and antibiotics. I so wish my mom had shared that with my brother. That he might have thought twice before victimizing his own sons