Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › The Mindful Home › Frugality & Finances › Interest only loan-would you do one?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Interest only loan-would you do one?  

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
Well, would ya?
If you were in an expensive area that will continue to get more expensive, and a nice house is just out of reach financially and your income will increase in the next five years but you want to buy the house you will live in forever, would you do one/
post #2 of 26
I think interest only loans are generally the best if you are planning to only own the home for a couple of years. I am not sure it is such a good idea when it is a home that you will live in forever. I guess an option would be to refinance after the interest only ARM is up.

I am not an expert by any means, but that has been my understanding with ARM.
post #3 of 26
No, not a chance. A lot of people are doing that here (DC area), and an awful lot of people are defaulting too. I would only buy a house I knew I could afford on my current salary. I am not an expert either though.
post #4 of 26
We got one because it was the only way we could get a loan at that time. I get mad every month when I pay the mortgage.

Everybody (our financial guy and our lawyer at the closing) told us to get out of it asap. We plan to refinance soon.
post #5 of 26
Never. I'd look for a loan I could afford on 1/2 our salary. Life rarely goes as expected.
post #6 of 26
No but we are considering refinancing with an interest only loan, so I would be very interested to hear of others with experience.
post #7 of 26
My initial reaction is "No."

BUT, that said, we did get a loan that is much more than we can logically afford. We live in the Seattle area and purchased our home 4.5 years ago (right before DS was born). Well, while DP has not gotten the raises we hoped for we are still REALLY glad we bought when we did. It *is* a stretch, but looking around there is no way we could buy here now. Just NO way. None.

So, I guess I would really, really have to look at it. Are you still looking in Seattle? Because they are supposed to have a pretty good housing market (in that it is not expected to "pop" or anything).
post #8 of 26
Yes, I would... only if you were planning on living in it for the rest of your life and your income is going to go up. Yes, it's a gamble buying a home...especially an Interest Only Loan... but my brother is a financial advisor and he isn't really fond of them but thinks as long as you are planning on keeping it for the long haul.. it's not a bad idea... just don't buy too big... that's where people come into trouble. It's good if you buy monderate. JMO... I'm not an expert either.
post #9 of 26
This is from my favorite Personal Finance website, Motley Fool

Quote:
Not in Your Best Interest
By Chris Mallon
October 18, 2004

In an article earlier this year, I discussed some pros and cons (mostly cons) of interest-only mortgages. In an effort to prolong the U.S. housing boom, finance companies are peddling these mortgages to the average homebuyer, setting everyone involved up for trouble down the road.

Traditionally the province of wealthy individuals looking for tax advantages, interest-only mortgages have become a panacea for homebuyers looking to buy, frankly, more house than they can afford. It's estimated that 10% to 15% of all new mortgages in 2004 were of the interest-only variety, compared with an historical average of less than 2%. With big lenders such as Countrywide Financial (NYSE: CFC), Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), and Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) (to name just a few) promoting these mortgages to average buyers, taking on an interest-only loan has become acceptable, and even somewhat chic. Even smaller banks, such as Provident Bank of Maryland -- a unit of Provident Bankshares (Nasdaq: PBKS) -- are in on this action.

The dangers of an interest-only mortgage are clear. Initial payments are artificially low (no principal), so when the principal amortization begins, monthly payments will skyrocket. The majority of people taking interest-only mortgages are stretching their monthly payments to the limit, betting that either their income or the house's value will rise, or both. Adding fuel to the fire, many interest-only mortgages are also ARMs, introducing the double whammy of higher interest rates to principal payments down the road. When payments start jumping, don't be surprised to see many of these houses hit the market, as overextended borrowers rush to get out from under the crushing debt. That's when you'll see the housing market decline, at least in some areas.

Here's an example. Let's assume that Johnny Homebuyer is approved for a mortgage payment up to $1,500 per month but needs a $350,000 loan. With an interest-only mortgage at an interest rate of 5%, Johnny can just barely afford it. When principal amortization begins five years down the road, if rates have moved just to 6%, he's looking at a new monthly payment of about $2,255. Better hope he gets a big raise.

In general, however, I wouldn't panic. Most people with interest-only mortgages today will simply be forced to refinance over a new 30-year period and cut back on the Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX). Not a great scenario, but not the end of the world either.
And this from Business Week
[QUOTE]Why is the surge in interest-only mortgages so frightening? Because many people are using them to buy houses that they couldn't otherwise afford. The monthly payment on an interest-only loan is lower because there's no amortization of principal. So people can qualify for bigger loans and buy bigger houses. The availability of such loans has probably contributed to the upward spiral in home prices, as shoppers armed with cheap financing try to outbid each other for choice properties.

The trouble comes when the interest-only feature expires, which is often after 10 years. If it's a 30-year loan, then the entire principal has to be paid off in the final 20 years. So the monthly payment could abruptly jump by 50% -- even assuming no increase in the interest rate (nearly all interest-only loans have adjustable rates, so the borrower can get whacked if they rise as well).

WRONG USERS. Interest-only mortgages were designed for wealthy families who used the loans as cash-flow management tools and could, if necessary, pay off the entire sum by liquidating some stocks and bonds. They can also be a good choice for people who have irregular incomes and strong self-discipline.

Such families can pay interest only in the lean months, then voluntarily make big principal payments in months when they have lots of income. Other natural candidates: People who are quite sure that their incomes will be rising sharply, like young doctors just out of medical school.

Trouble is, the sheer numbers indicate that the loans are also being taken out by a much bigger sector of the public -- people who are struggling to get into a rising housing market and feel that they couldn't get the properties they want any other way.

"BUYERS HAVE NO IDEA." Often, interest-only borrowers argue that they will refinance or sell their homes before the principal payments start coming due. But the risks are high. If they refinance, the new payment could be higher than the old one. And if they sell, they need to hope that prices have kept rising. Otherwise, they won't even recoup all of their downpayment.

Lenders that make interest-only loans argue that there's little risk of a wave of defaults as long as the economy remains reasonably strong and housing prices don't crash. But even some parties that benefit from the rage for interest-only mortgages, like homebuilders, are wondering if the trend may have gone too far. "In most of those cases, buyers have no idea how they're going to pay" the higher payments that will be owed once principal payments begin, says William J. Pulte, founder and chairman of Pulte Homes (PHM ).

Buyer, beware, indeed.
[QUOTE]
post #10 of 26
I would not do one. There are a lot of mortgage options out there that can help almost anyone get into a house. I'd talk to a good mortgage broker about your options. Some of the potential porblems with interest-only are:

1. There is no guarantee that the home value will increase. When the interest-only term is up you could owe more on the house than it is worth. This could make it difficult/impossible to find a traditional loan, and you could lose your down-payment and the house.
2. You do not build equity. Although equity builds very slowly at the start of traditional loan, there is always some equity that gets built on each month. This gives you a cushion if you need to sell the house (for some reason), want to take a home-equity loan, or whatever.
3. It is unlikley that mortgage rates will be lower at the end of the interest-only term. You may find yourself in too much home - that is, one that you can no longer afford because the mortage payment is now too high. Since you have no equity in the house you may also not be able to sell without a loss.
4. There is no guarantee that your income will increase. Unexpected things do happen - and if they happened at the time that your interest-only period was up you could lose the home.

My feeling is that an interest-only loan is basically a gamble on the house value increasing, your ability to make larger payments (more income) increasing, and mortage rates not changing significantly. The gamble is made with your largest and most important investment/posession.

Personally, I like the predictability of a 30 year fixed rate loan. If/when our income goes up we can make additional payments on principal to build equity and reduce the term of our loan. If times are tight we can make the regular payment.
post #11 of 26
NO! I am far from being an expert. I believe that you were given some very good reasons not to by pp's. It is way too much gambling for me. Life has a way of not working out the way you want it to. What happens when the Big raise never materializes? I truely think it is too much overextending. I was just watching TV the other day and the Professional said that there will be alot of defaults on loans because of the people that got ARM's. Their payments will shoot up and they will not be able to keep up.
post #12 of 26
Well we do have one and I think it can work in some cases.

We have what is called a Smart 30, the first 10 years are interest only, then years 11-30 are P&I. The payment will only go up $20.00 once it hits the P&I phase and we have a fixed rate for the entire 30 years.

That said, we bought my g-mas house WELL below what its worth, so we got a good deal and instant equity of about $100k if we ever needed it.

So sometimes they can work, you just have to do your homework!

Good luck!
post #13 of 26
We have one.

We bought based on my dh's salary only, so we're not in more house that we can afford. Our payments are the same as rent was, and that is paying about $100 extra on principal.

It IS a gamble that housing prices will go up, but we got a decent deal on our house, and chances are, our housing costs WILL go up. (We live in Atlanta)

Also, we are planning on being in our house less than 5 years. My dh sat down with his MBA brain and figured out what you pay in a traditional loan the first 5 years. VERY similar interest amounts. VERY similar. So, yes, we build very little equity by just our payments, but so would a traditional 30 year fixed loan in the first 5 years. Circumstances do change, true, but I certainly hope and pray that our circumstances do not force us to stay in this house for greater than 5 years. We don't want to be in this town that long.

So, I think it CAN work for some people in some situations. Just depends.
post #14 of 26
We have one. For many reasons listed in those articles. My husband's income will rise sharply in the next five years and I will go back to work in that time. We plan to be in this house until they carry us out, so we're not looking to flip it before the principal is due...
post #15 of 26
I wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole in this market. There's often not much advantage to renting when you're using in IO loan.

FTR: I'm a business journalist who edits real estate stories for a big newspaper, so I follow this stuff pretty closely. None of my colleagues who cover real estate here use those products, if that tells you anything.
post #16 of 26
I wouldn't, but I'm pretty financially conservative -- if I couldn't afford a house with a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, I'd either buy a smaller house, keep renting until I'd saved more money, or relocate somewhere with less expensive real estate prices.

I think an interest-only loan is a particularly bad idea in the current housing market, because the potential for stagnant or decreasing home prices in the next 5 or so years means that if you did need to sell, you might have negative equity, and if you wanted to refinance, you might not be able to.
post #17 of 26
post #18 of 26
Another "no" vote. IO loans turn the fairly safe investment of a house into a negative equity nightmare.
post #19 of 26
Yes, and we have one, but for very specific reasons.

DH is in graduate school for his PhD. We moved from a signficantly more expensive housing market to a less expensive housing market. We had a substantial savings before the move in addition to the profit on our previous house.

We could have paid off our mortgage for the most part, but opted to do an interest only loan because for us, it frees up cash in case of emergency, etc. since DH just receives a stipend (not a ton of money). I am a SAHM.

So we are okay with it, but only because we didn't use it to buy a house that was beyond our means IMO. We could have easily afforded our current home by using our savings, but we like having that cash available to us should we need it for some reason while our income is limited. We're also not sure we'll stay here beyond the 4-5 years he'll be in school, and our loan is interest only for 5 years.

We are also not in an overpriced housing market at all, so IMO it would be unlikely for homes in our area to take a significant dip in value. It makes the gamble feel a little better for us.

We crunched numbers and weren't sure what to do intially, but we're glad we made this choice.

I would NOT feel comfortable going interest-only in a "hot" housing market where there may be a dip in prices down the road if the bubble bursts. I would not feel comfortable getting one simply to get into a bigger/better house that I otherwise wouldn't be able to afford, unless I had no other options (and even then I'd be weighing that choice very carefully).

Good luck to you!
post #20 of 26
Thread Starter 
probably we wont do one.
Tired, we are actually going to stay and buy in Olympia. Our situation looks like this:
With our down payment and income, we could afford a 2/1 house with a yard in a great neighborhood. we are hoping to find one that we can add onto eventually, hopefully with dormers, changing any attic space into a second story. We never want to have too move again. My oldest son is 9, he has lived in 6 states, 7 houses and a tent twice. We want stability now. So, the reason the io is interesting is because for about $20,000-$30,000 more, we could get a 3/2 in that same neighborhood. I am in school now and when I am done, my income will go from $7,000 a year in grants to actual money. Also, dh's income varies, and most months we are fine, but some months it gets really tight.
But,i dont want to buy with risk, so we will probably just focus on a 2 br. The 3 is appealing because there are five of us.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Frugality & Finances
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › The Mindful Home › Frugality & Finances › Interest only loan-would you do one?