Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Scientists Create Artificial Penis
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Scientists Create Artificial Penis  

post #1 of 14
Thread Starter 
I'm off for a trip to Arkansas.... thought I'd leave with this gem I just noticed on yahoo news


Things proceeded just as nature intended, the researchers said...



Scientists Create Artificial Penis
May 23, 2006 08:47:14 PM PST
By E.J. Mundell
HealthDay Reporter

Yahoo! Health: Men's Health News

TUESDAY, May 23 (HealthDay News) -- Success with randy, replicating rabbits suggests that an "artificial penis" made from a patient's own penile cells might someday help men challenged by tough-to-treat impotence.

In the study, adult male rabbits with severely damaged penises received a graft of specially engineered penile tissue. The animals then re-grew full penises that functioned normally -- even to the point of successfully impregnating females.

"This is very exciting -- the researchers have been working on this for a long time in a variety of different organs. It's not yet clinically available, but if it works and proves safe and effective, it would be a tremendous advance," said Dr. Ira Sharlip, a spokesman for the American Urological Association and a clinical professor of urology at the University of California, San Francisco.

Sharlip was not involved in the study, which was led by Dr. Anthony Atala, director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C. His team reported its findings Tuesday at the American Urological Association annual meeting, in Atlanta.

Drugs like Cialis, Levitra and Viagra have revolutionized the treatment of impotence for millions of men over the past decade. However, some forms of erectile dysfunction remain very difficult to treat.

A condition called "corporal fibrosis" -- where the tubes of penile "spongy tissue" that maintain erection are gradually replaced by inactive, fibrous scar tissue -- remains largely untreatable. The disorder occurs when the penis' sensitive spongy-tissue cells don't get the oxygen they need to survive, usually because of a chronic reduction in blood flow.

"It's relatively common in men with diabetes and various forms of vascular disease, or men who've previously had infections -- usually infections of a penile prosthesis," Sharlip said. "There are men who have such severe fibrosis that nothing can be done to restore their natural erection function, other than to implant a surgical prosthesis," he added.

However, advances in biotechnology have spurred research into replacing dead tissues with new, living tissues grown in a laboratory using the patient's own cells. According to Sharlip, Atala has long been a pioneer in this field, working not just with penile tissues but with tissues from other organs.

In their latest study, the Wake Forest researchers first used standard biopsy techniques to harvest smooth-muscle and blood-vessel cells from the penises of healthy adult male rabbits. In the lab, the researchers used these cells to "seed" a special nutrient-rich collagen matrix. Over time, the cells multiplied within this framework to grow into new penile tissue.

Next, the team surgically removed all of the natural spongy tissue from the penises of the donor rabbits. They then grafted in the engineered tissue.

Atala's group tracked the rabbits' penile growth and function over the next one, three and six months.

The researchers found that the new penises were similar in structure to natural rabbit penises. The "artificial penis" also achieved and maintained erectile pressures equal to those of normal rabbit penises.

Next came the real test, as the rabbits that had received the new penises were presented with sexually mature females.

Things proceeded just as nature intended, the researchers said.

"Mating activity in the animals with the engineered [penis] resumed by 1 month after implantation," they reported. "Presence of sperm was confirmed in the vaginal vault of the female partners, and all females conceived and delivered healthy pups."

Sharlip cautioned this is a preliminary study involving animals. But he said that "rabbit tissue is fairly similar to human tissue. If it can be done in rabbits, it probably can be done in humans."

Doctors who treated men with corporal fibrosis in this way would still face another hurdle, however: Treating the underlying cause of the fibrosis itself.

"There's the question of how you restore that needed blood supply," Sharlip said. "You may be able to restore the natural spongy tissue of these erection chambers, but in a patient with severe corporal fibrosis you also have to get the blood supply to come back into the new, restored tissue." Without that steady source of oxygen, any implant might meet the same fate as the tissue it had replaced, he said.

Still, the advance does mark one of the few breakthroughs against the disorder in years, Sharlip said. And he added that success in tissue engineering has implications "not only for the treatment of erectile dysfunction but in the world of medicine in general."

"If we could re-grow and replace worn-out tissue [in other body parts], that would have tremendous implications," Sharlip said.

More information

For more on erectile dysfunction, visit the American Urological Association.
post #2 of 14
LOL, it is certainly funny and a great article.

Does it have something to do with circumcision? Perhaps some potential for high-tech regrowth? Or is this just general good news?

Either way, thanks for sharing!
post #3 of 14

Does that mean I could grow a foreskin??

Now wouldn't that be cool!

Eric
post #4 of 14
Just give it a few decades and we shall see...

Certainly seems promosing.
post #5 of 14
Pkay, I'm not a huge animal activist or anything, but it seems really mean to me to be severely damaging these poor rabbits penises to see if they can regrow them...

But of course I guess they cut little human baby's penises every day, what does a rabbit or two matter. sigh.
post #6 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightymoo
But of course I guess they cut little human baby's penises every day, what does a rabbit or two matter. sigh.
I believe I am correct in saying that opposition to tail docking and declawing is actually larger that anti-circumcision in the US...

Odd. I mean, I get the whole animal-loving thing but you would have thought they care more about slicing parts of their sons.
post #7 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revamp
I believe I am correct in saying that opposition to tail docking and declawing is actually larger that anti-circumcision in the US...

Odd. I mean, I get the whole animal-loving thing but you would have thought they care more about slicing parts of their sons.
Another difference there is the the vets are all against docking and declawing - whereas for circ it seems like doctors for the most part don't care much. It's strange to me, because vets get paid to do declaw too, so its not like there isn't a monetary incentive.
post #8 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightymoo
Another difference there is the the vets are all against docking and declawing - whereas for circ it seems like doctors for the most part don't care much. It's strange to me, because vets get paid to do declaw too, so its not like there isn't a monetary incentive.
Bizarre...

In some ways I reckon it is because animals are valued less than human beings: if you are a vet who has done dockings and you realise that it is pointless then stopping seems easy, there are a few docked dogs in the world that were your doing but morally, you are sorta in the clean because you believed it to be right.

A doctor though, well (s)he has to accept that they have destroyed the protective erogenous zones of hundreds, if not thousands of innocent and unconsenting boys in a procedure that will only damage their health. They advised it, organised and performed the entire thing over and over and over again for years, maybe decades.

Can you see why that would be a little difficult to accept?
post #9 of 14
Yeah. Sigh.

I suppose its similar to any other sort of injustic and prejudice. It needs to die out, as the young replace the old, the old attitudes and beliefs go by the wayside before it can be completely eradicated.

I wonder how long it took to convince the medical profession as a whole that bloodletting was a bad idea?
post #10 of 14
Well, they still draw blood to test for everything. I guess that's the up to date "blood letting"

I think that it will be about 10-15 years before it dies out, if not become illegal by then, in America.
post #11 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treece
Well, they still draw blood to test for everything. I guess that's the up to date "blood letting"


Quote:
I think that it will be about 10-15 years before it dies out, if not become illegal by then, in America.
I would say a few decades more than that, if only because of all of those deceitful HIV studies. But it is an anachronism, it will only last as long as it takes people to figure that out.
post #12 of 14
if they can make rabbits regrow fully formed functioning rabbit penisses, maybe in the cases of circumcised men who wishes they weren't, they will devise a way for them to grow the foreskin back?
post #13 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabysmom617
if they can make rabbits regrow fully formed functioning rabbit penisses, maybe in the cases of circumcised men who wishes they weren't, they will devise a way for them to grow the foreskin back?
We can only hope so!

I am not sure that is the variety of research that would attract sponsers though, at least not in the US.
post #14 of 14
(a bit of salt) If you've followed science, you know that what works for one species doesn't necessarily work for another. This is even more true with applying animal studies to humans. A good example of this is that gasoline causes cancer in rats but for humans to have this same effect requires huge mega-doses (no, this hasn't been done) for the same effect but other effects of gasoline would kick in way before any cancer causing ones. This is why there are warning stickers all over gas stations as well as every other man-made product. Ah, the joys of the American medico-legal world.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Scientists Create Artificial Penis