I've had this thought, and reading through the UTI thread I noticed that several others of you have had the same thought. When there are studies that show a miniscule increase in UTI risk in intact boys, are those particular boys being prematurely retracted?
I bet, that if a large scale study was done comparing healthy full-term circumcised infant boys to healthy full-term intact infant boys who were never retracted under any circumstance, then the rates would either be the same or the intact boys would actually have lower rates.
~Nay
I bet, that if a large scale study was done comparing healthy full-term circumcised infant boys to healthy full-term intact infant boys who were never retracted under any circumstance, then the rates would either be the same or the intact boys would actually have lower rates.
~Nay






